Case Law
Subject : Service Law - Pay and Allowances
Guwahati: In a significant interim relief for Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel, the Gauhati High Court has ordered a stay on the recovery of Risk & Hardship Allowance (RHA) that had been previously paid to them. The single-judge bench of Justice Susmita PhukanKhaund directed that no recovery shall be made without the express leave of the Court.
The decision came in response to a writ petition, Pronob Jyoti Gogoi & Ors. vs The Union of India & Ors. , filed by 203 personnel of the 142nd Battalion, CRPF, stationed in Golaghat, Assam.
The petitioners challenged a recent Office Memorandum (OM) dated April 28, 2025, which not only unilaterally withdrew the RHA but also mandated the recovery of amounts already disbursed to them. This allowance was originally granted under a 2017 OM from the Ministry of Home Affairs, which established specific criteria for its payment to CRPF personnel serving in high-risk and difficult areas. The sudden reversal of this policy prompted the personnel to seek judicial intervention.
Mr. K. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioners, argued that the move to withdraw the allowance and recover the paid sums was arbitrary and unjust. He drew the Court's attention to a precedent within the same court, highlighting that a coordinate bench had already granted interim protection in a similar matter, W.P.(C) No.168/2025 .
Representing the Union of India and other respondents, Ms. K. Phukan, learned Central Government Counsel (CGC), acknowledged the existence of similar pending petitions with interim orders. While requesting time to obtain detailed instructions, she confirmed the factual position regarding the related cases.
After hearing the preliminary arguments, Justice
"Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in its entirety, as an interim measure, it is hereby provided that there shall be no recovery of RHA amount paid to the petitioners in terms of the impugned OM dated 28.04.2025, without the leave of the Court."
The Court's order provides immediate respite to the 203 CRPF jawans and officers, preventing any deductions from their salaries to recover the disputed allowance until the matter is heard further.
The Court has issued a notice of motion, and since the CGC has accepted the notice on behalf of all respondents, no formal notices will be sent. The matter is now slated to be listed for a comprehensive hearing alongside other connected writ petitions, including W.P.(C) No.168/2025 and WP(C)/2866/2025 , ensuring a consolidated approach to the legal question at hand.
#ServiceLaw #CRPF #GauhatiHighCourt
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.