Right to Counsel
2024-06-01
Subject: Criminal Law - Constitutional Rights
PORTLAND, Ore. — A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a ruling that Oregon defendants must be released from jail after seven days if they don't have a defense attorney.
In its decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals called Oregon's public defense system a "Sixth Amendment nightmare," OPB reported, referring to the part of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees people accused of crimes the right to a lawyer. The opinion said Oregon is responsible for upholding legal protections for criminal defendants.
Oregon has struggled for years to address its public defender crisis. As of Friday, more than 3,200 defendants did not have a public defender, a dashboard from the Oregon Judicial Department showed. Of those, about 146 people were in custody, but fewer people were expected to be impacted by Friday's ruling, according to OPB.
An Office of Public Defense Services draft report from March found that Oregon needs 500 additional attorneys to meet its obligations, OPB reported. State officials have sought to address the issue, including by taking such steps as providing additional funding, but structural issues remain.
Next year, the Oregon Public Defense Commission will move from the judiciary to the executive branch under the governor. State lawmakers hope the move will provide more support to the agency.
The 9th Circuit's decision upheld a preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael McShane last year. The case came from
Oregon's federal public defender, Fidel Cassino-DuCloux, said Friday's decision "breathes life into the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, which have been an empty promise for too many presumptively innocent Oregonians charged with crimes."
"We hope that the state authorities heed the
When asked by OPB whether the state would appeal, a spokesperson for the Oregon Department of Justice said they're reviewing the decision.
public defender crisis - Sixth Amendment right to counsel - criminal defendants - habeas corpus petition - judicial oversight - executive branch support - structural issues - legal protections - presumptively innocent
#OregonPublicDefense #SixthAmendment #CriminalJusticeReform
Thane Court Rejects Application to Dismiss Defamation Suit Against Digvijaya Singh Over RSS Remarks: Order VII Rule 11 CPC
06 Feb 2026
Ministry Revises Fees for Central Government Counsel Effective 2026
06 Feb 2026
Temporary Re-Employment Not Entitling Ex-Serviceman to Civil Pension: Punjab & Haryana HC
06 Feb 2026
High Courts Confirm Only 10% of Death Sentences Since 2016
06 Feb 2026
Finality in IPS Cadre Allocation Cannot Be Reopened After Decades: Supreme Court
06 Feb 2026
Patna HC Quashes Cognizance Against Minister Sans Assault Allegations
06 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Directs Trial Courts to Inform Accused of Legal Aid Rights Before Witness Examination
07 Feb 2026
Law Ministry Reveals 73% Upper Caste Judges Since 2021
07 Feb 2026
Dwivedi: British Geopolitics Created Pakistan, Not Jinnah
07 Feb 2026
The court emphasized the right to legal aid for under-trials and the necessity of timely legal representation in criminal proceedings.
Non-prosecution leads to dismissal of the petition when petitioners fail to represent.
The court emphasized the right to fair prosecution and set a timeline for considering the petitioner's representation regarding appointing a Special Public Prosecutor.
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.