Subject :
O R D E R
After going by the Schedule attached to the plaint, the suit property contained 70 items out of which the dispute is only with respect to Item Nos. 09 and 12. The submission made by Mr. V. Prabhakar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants as also the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would reveal the desire of the parties to try to settle the matter among themselves. In that view of the matter, the parties are permitted to try to settle the dispute among themselves.
List on 06.03.2024.
(VIJAY KUMAR) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.13 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Nos.11393-11394/2011 P. VELAYUTHAM AND ORS. & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS P. GANESAN AND ORS. & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 2865/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 2864/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 08-02-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL For Appellant(s) Mr. V. Prabhakar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, Adv.
Ms. Jyoti Parashar, Adv. Mr. M. Chinnadurai, Adv. Mr. N.J. Rachandar, Adv.
Mrs. Revathy Raghavan, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Shoba Ramamurthy, Adv.
Mr. G. Ananda Selvam, Adv.
Mr. Mayilsamy K., Adv.
Mr. Sanchit Maheshwari, Adv.
Mr. Shilp Vinor, Adv.
Mr. Vincy George, Adv.
Mr. Gokulakrishnan S.R., Adv.
Mr. Ajay Subhash B., Adv.
Ms. Lakshmi Ramamurthy, AOR Mr. R. Sathish, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
After going by the Schedule attached to the plaint, the suit property contained 70 items out of which the dispute is only with respect to Item Nos. 09 and 12. The submission made by Mr. V. Prabhakar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants as also the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would reveal the desire of the parties to try to settle the matter among themselves. In that view of the matter, the parties are permitted to try to settle the dispute among themselves.
List on 06.02.2024.
(VIJAY KUMAR) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.13 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Nos.11393-11394/2011 P. VELAYUTHAM AND ORS. & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS P. GANESAN AND ORS. & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 2865/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 2864/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 08-02-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL For Appellant(s) Mr. V. Prabhakar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, Adv.
Ms. Jyoti Parashar, Adv. Mr. M. Chinnadurai, Adv. Mr. N.J. Rachandar, Adv.
Mrs. Revathy Raghavan, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Shoba Ramamurthy, Adv.
Mr. G. Ananda Selvam, Adv.
Mr. Mayilsamy K., Adv.
Mr. Sanchit Maheshwari, Adv.
Mr. Shilp Vinor, Adv.
Mr. Vincy George, Adv.
Mr. Gokulakrishnan S.R., Adv.
Mr. Ajay Subhash B., Adv.
Ms. Lakshmi Ramamurthy, AOR Mr. R. Sathish, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
After going by the Schedule attached to the plaint, the suit property contained 70 items out of which the dispute is only with respect to Item Nos. 09 and 12. The submission made by Mr. V. Prabhakar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants as also the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would reveal the desire of the parties to try to settle the matter among themselves. In that view of the matter, the parties are permitted to try to settle the dispute among themselves.
List on 06.02.2024.
(VIJAY KUMAR) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.