Subject :
O R D E R
After going by the Schedule attached to the plaint, the suit property contained 70 items out of which the dispute is only with respect to Item Nos. 09 and 12. The submission made by Mr. V. Prabhakar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants as also the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would reveal the desire of the parties to try to settle the matter among themselves. In that view of the matter, the parties are permitted to try to settle the dispute among themselves.
List on 06.03.2024.
(VIJAY KUMAR) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.13 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Nos.11393-11394/2011 P. VELAYUTHAM AND ORS. & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS P. GANESAN AND ORS. & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 2865/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 2864/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 08-02-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL For Appellant(s) Mr. V. Prabhakar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, Adv.
Ms. Jyoti Parashar, Adv. Mr. M. Chinnadurai, Adv. Mr. N.J. Rachandar, Adv.
Mrs. Revathy Raghavan, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Shoba Ramamurthy, Adv.
Mr. G. Ananda Selvam, Adv.
Mr. Mayilsamy K., Adv.
Mr. Sanchit Maheshwari, Adv.
Mr. Shilp Vinor, Adv.
Mr. Vincy George, Adv.
Mr. Gokulakrishnan S.R., Adv.
Mr. Ajay Subhash B., Adv.
Ms. Lakshmi Ramamurthy, AOR Mr. R. Sathish, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
After going by the Schedule attached to the plaint, the suit property contained 70 items out of which the dispute is only with respect to Item Nos. 09 and 12. The submission made by Mr. V. Prabhakar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants as also the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would reveal the desire of the parties to try to settle the matter among themselves. In that view of the matter, the parties are permitted to try to settle the dispute among themselves.
List on 06.02.2024.
(VIJAY KUMAR) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.13 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Nos.11393-11394/2011 P. VELAYUTHAM AND ORS. & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS P. GANESAN AND ORS. & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 2865/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 2864/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 08-02-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL For Appellant(s) Mr. V. Prabhakar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, Adv.
Ms. Jyoti Parashar, Adv. Mr. M. Chinnadurai, Adv. Mr. N.J. Rachandar, Adv.
Mrs. Revathy Raghavan, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Shoba Ramamurthy, Adv.
Mr. G. Ananda Selvam, Adv.
Mr. Mayilsamy K., Adv.
Mr. Sanchit Maheshwari, Adv.
Mr. Shilp Vinor, Adv.
Mr. Vincy George, Adv.
Mr. Gokulakrishnan S.R., Adv.
Mr. Ajay Subhash B., Adv.
Ms. Lakshmi Ramamurthy, AOR Mr. R. Sathish, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
After going by the Schedule attached to the plaint, the suit property contained 70 items out of which the dispute is only with respect to Item Nos. 09 and 12. The submission made by Mr. V. Prabhakar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants as also the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would reveal the desire of the parties to try to settle the matter among themselves. In that view of the matter, the parties are permitted to try to settle the dispute among themselves.
List on 06.02.2024.
(VIJAY KUMAR) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
Supreme Court Rules Criminal Courts Must Not Act As Recovery Agents For Disputed Dues
27 Jul 2026
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.