Petitions Based on News Reports Should First Be Addressed to Govt Secretary, Not Court: Kerala High Court - 2025-07-03

Kerala High Court Directs Petitioner to Approach Government First, Disposes of PIL Based on News Report

ERNAKULAM: The Kerala High Court, in a brief yet significant order, has clarified the appropriate procedural path for grievances raised through public interest litigation based on newspaper reports. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji disposed of a writ petition, directing the petitioner to first approach the concerned State Government Secretary for resolution.

Case Overview

The writ petition, WP(C) 25674/2024 , was filed by Mr. TGN Kumar against the State of Kerala. The petition was initiated based on a letter written by the petitioner himself, which was supplemented by a newspaper report concerning the same issue. Mr. Kumar , represented by Advocate Shaji Chirayath , sought the High Court's intervention to address the matter highlighted in the report.

Court's Reasoning: Deference to Administrative Channels

The State was represented by Government Pleader K. R. Ranjith. After hearing the counsel, the High Court determined that direct judicial intervention was premature. The bench emphasized that the primary responsibility for examining such issues lies with the executive branch of the government.

The court articulated a clear procedural directive, highlighting the principle of exhausting administrative remedies before seeking judicial review.

Pivotal Judgment Excerpt

In its order, the bench stated the core of its reasoning succinctly:

"The appropriate course of action would be to place the petition before the concerned Secretary of the State Government as it is for the concerned Secretary to look into the matter and take necessary steps as deemed appropriate."

This statement underscores the court's stance that administrative bodies must be given the first opportunity to investigate and act upon public grievances before the judiciary steps in.

Final Decision and Implications

The High Court accordingly disposed of the writ petition. The decision does not comment on the merits of the petitioner's grievance but firmly establishes the procedural protocol. By directing the petitioner to the relevant government secretary, the court reinforces the separation of powers and ensures that administrative mechanisms are utilized effectively. This ruling serves as a reminder to potential litigants that grievances, particularly those highlighted in media reports, should first be formally presented to the appropriate government authorities for redressal before approaching the courts.