Case Law
Subject : Taxation Law - Direct Taxation
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to extend the due date for filing Income Tax Returns (ITRs) to November 30, 2025, for assessees who are required to furnish a tax audit report. The decision, delivered by a bench of Justice Lisa Gill and Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta, reinforces the statutory one-month gap between the deadline for filing the audit report and the ITR.
The Court expressed its disapproval of the CBDT's tendency to delay such decisions until the last moment, echoing a recent, similar ruling by the Gujarat High Court.
A batch of four writ petitions, led by Ashwini Kumar vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes , was filed seeking an extension of the deadline for filing tax audit reports and, consequently, the ITRs for the Assessment Year 2025-26. The petitioners argued that the e-filing utilities for the audit reports and returns were made available by the Income Tax Department only in August 2025, significantly reducing the time available for compliance and causing "genuine hardship" to taxpayers and professionals.
The original deadline for filing the tax audit report under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , was September 30, 2025.
The petitioners contended that the delay in releasing the necessary forms warranted a reasonable extension. They highlighted that the law itself, under Explanation (ii) to Section 44AB , defines the "specified date" for filing the audit report as one month prior to the "due date" for filing the ITR under Section 139(1).
During the proceedings, the CBDT did extend the deadline for filing the tax audit report from September 30 to October 31, 2025. However, it remained non-committal on the corresponding extension for filing the ITR, repeatedly informing the court that the proposal was "under consideration."
The High Court took significant note of a decision by the Gujarat High Court dated October 13, 2025, in a similar matter ( Income Tax Bar Association vs. Union of India ). In that case, the Gujarat High Court had already directed the CBDT to extend the ITR due date to November 30, 2025.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court quoted the Gujarat High Court's sharp criticism of the CBDT's practice of waiting until the deadline is imminent:
> “...respondent no. 2 -CBDT therefore would not be justified to wait till end of OCTOBER,2025 for issuing circular to extend the “due date”.”
The bench observed that the CBDT had not challenged the Gujarat High Court's order, yet had failed to issue the necessary circular, creating uncertainty for taxpayers nationwide.
Finding no justification for further adjournments, the Court concluded that the CBDT's inaction was untenable. The bench held that if the "specified date" for the audit report is extended to October 31, then the "due date" for the ITR must consequentially be extended to maintain the statutory one-month period.
Disposing of all four petitions, the Court issued a clear directive:
> "...directing respondent – CBDT to issue necessary circular in exercise of power under Section 119 of the Act to extend the due date for filing of returns by assessees required to file audit report... for Financial Year 2024-2025 (Assessment Year 2025-26) to 30.11.2025."
This ruling provides much-needed clarity and relief to companies, firms, and other assessees subject to tax audits, ensuring they have adequate time for compliance as envisioned by the statute.
#TaxLaw #DueDateExtension #CBDT
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.