Back
When Protectors Turn Predators: Rajasthan HC Cracks Down on Alleged Police-Gangster Nexus
In a scathing indictment of potential police-criminal collusion, the has directed immediate protection for a Bikaner family facing gangster threats to drop a case against a police officer. Justice Farjand Ali, in a order ( ), invoked to mandate state action, warning of a "systemic failure" if cops shield criminals.
Roots of Retribution: A Arrest Gone Wrong
The saga began in when family members of lead petitioner Altaf Bano were allegedly illegally arrested by then-police officer Sanjay Bothra (now DYSP in Ajmer) without . When Altaf sought answers at Kotgate police station, she and relatives faced brutal assault. She filed a complaint, leading to by the on . Bothra challenged this, but the High Court upheld proceedings in a order. As prosecution evidence loomed, threats escalated.
Gangster Calls and Police Silence: The Petitioners' Desperate Plea
Petitioners Altaf Bano, sons Javed Khan Panwar and Imran Khan, and Foroj Khan argued that Bothra, fearing trial, unleashed a notorious gangster, Rohit Godara. From , Godara bombarded Imran via WhatsApp (+35192464922) demanding case withdrawal, with threats of "dire consequences." Despite representations to the IG and DGP on , no protection or FIR followed. They invoked , citing Lata Singh v. State of U.P. (AIR 2006 SC 2522) for the state's duty to protect lives amid real threats, accusing authorities of apathy subverting justice.
State counsel, via , submitted a factual report admitting the threats but offered no counter on protection lapses. The court noted police acknowledgment made action "imperative, immediate, and enforceable."
Unpacking the Alarm: Court's Razor-Sharp Reasoning
Justice Ali dissected the rot: a police report confirming gangster threats triggered non-discretionary duties. He drew on Lata Singh to affirm 's positive obligation on the state against known dangers. The court refrained from prejudging Bothra—denying him a hearing—but flagged the "disturbing" claim of a cop deploying a gangster as an existential threat to . No other precedents were cited, but the logic echoed Supreme Court mandates on witness protection amid intimidation.
Allegations painted Bothra as orchestrating obstruction at trial's evidence stage, forcing constant fear on the family. The judgment integrated police admissions to underscore urgency, terming inaction an "abdication of statutory duty."
Echoes from the Bench: Unforgettable Lines
"Once such a serious fact stands acknowledged by the State machinery, the obligation cast upon the police authorities does not remain discretionary but becomes imperative, immediate, and enforceable in law."
"When the protector becomes the destructor, the confidence of the public in the system stands shattered, and the institutional framework meant to uphold law and order risks complete collapse."
"A democratic society governed by thecannot afford a situation where those entrusted with the duty to protect citizens are perceived as agents of intimidation and fear."
"State cannot remain a mute spectator when credible threats to life are brought to its notice."
Fortress of Justice: Directives and Ripples Ahead
The court disposed of the writ (S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 229/2026) with binding orders:
- SP Bikaner : Immediate, continuous protection for petitioners and kin.
- DGP Jaipur : Serious probe, no mechanical handling.
- Home Secretary & DGP : Impartial inquiry by senior officer; Bothra disengaged from petitioners, barred from contacts tainting the process.
This ensures trial integrity while signaling zero tolerance for badge-wielding bullies. Future cases may cite it for swift safeguards against admitted threats, bolstering witness security and deterring official overreach. For families like Altaf's, it's a lifeline; for the system, a wake-up call.
