Advocate Clerks Association Joins Strike Over Administrative Dispute
JODHPUR: The Advocate Clerks Association has officially joined the ongoing strike at the , following the decision of the local Bar bodies to abstain from judicial work until . In a notice dated , the association declared a , warning its members of strict for any violation.
The development escalates the ongoing protest by the legal fraternity against Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, whom the Bar has accused of misusing and manipulating . The notice, signed by Association President and Secretary , states that no member will participate in any during the strike period.
Solidarity in Protest
The advocate clerks’ decision mirrors the earlier resolutions passed by the Advocate Association and the Lawyers Association (Jodhpur). In a joint General House meeting, these associations had announced the stoppage of all judicial work at the . The clerks’ association has now extended its full support, ensuring that legal support staff also withdraw from court processes.
The notice explicitly warns that any member found engaging in court work during the strike will face and will be personally liable for any resulting losses or consequences.
Dispute Over Administrative Authority
The root of the protest lies in the Bar’s allegation that Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma has been improperly exercising his , particularly in the listing of cases. The lawyers and clerks have claimed that this manipulation undermines the independence and fairness of . The strike is intended to pressure the administration to address these grievances.
Implications for Court Operations
With both advocates and clerks abstaining from work, the functioning of the is expected to face significant disruption. Routine hearings, filings, and other judicial processes are likely to be stalled until . The association has made it clear that any member who violates the boycott will be subject to internal disciplinary proceedings, leaving no room for ambiguity regarding the association’s stance.
The situation remains fluid, with the potential for further escalation if the administrative concerns are not addressed. The legal community in Rajasthan is closely watching for any response from the High Court administration or the Acting Chief Justice.