Case Law
Subject : Public Interest Litigation - Administrative Law
Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court has issued a series of stringent directives to both the state and central governments to ensure the complete and effective implementation of the Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act, 2019. Hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the court underscored the need for a more concerted effort to curb the sale and availability of e-cigarettes.
The division bench, comprising Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjeet Purohit , passed the order in the case of Priyansha Gupta vs Union Of India after acknowledging that despite some initial steps, "much is required to be done" to enforce the nationwide ban.
The writ petition, filed as a PIL, sought the court's intervention for the strict enforcement of the Prohibition Of Electronic Cigarettes (Production, Manufacture, Import, Export, Transport, Sale, Distribution, Storage and Advertisement) Act, 2019 . During the hearing on September 18, 2025, an Additional Superintendent of Police present in court conceded that while some e-cigarettes had been seized and the Central Government had initiated the blocking of certain websites, these measures were insufficient to achieve the objectives of the Act.
Observing the gaps in enforcement, the High Court directed the state machinery to formulate and execute a comprehensive action plan. The key directives issued to the Government of Rajasthan include:
The court has mandated the state to file a detailed compliance report outlining the specific steps taken in each district before the next hearing.
The bench also turned its attention to the role of the central government in curbing the online sale and promotion of e-cigarettes. The counsel for the Union of India has been instructed to file a report detailing:
This interim order signifies a major push from the judiciary to ensure that the legislative ban on e-cigarettes translates into a ground-level reality. By mandating a multi-tiered enforcement mechanism involving the DGP and District Collectors, the court aims to create a robust framework for compliance. The call for detailed reports from both state and central authorities establishes clear accountability.
The matter has been listed for the next hearing on November 12, 2025 , by which date the compliance reports are expected to be on record. The outcome of this PIL could set a precedent for how other states address the challenge of enforcing the e-cigarette ban.
#ECigaretteBan #RajasthanHighCourt #PublicHealthLaw
Bail Cannot Be Denied Under UAPA on Uncorroborated Approver Testimony & Telephonic Links Sans Recovery: J&K&L High Court
09 Apr 2026
Pune Court: Swatantryaveer Title Not Government-Conferred in Gandhi Case
10 Apr 2026
Supreme Court: Temple Exclusions Harm Hinduism
10 Apr 2026
Stranger Directly Affected by Interim Order Entitled to Impleadment in Writ Proceedings: Supreme Court
10 Apr 2026
Dismissal from BSF Valid Without Security Force Court Trial if Inexpedient Due to Civilians Involved: Calcutta HC
10 Apr 2026
Limitation Under Section 468 CrPC Runs From FIR Filing Date, Not Cognizance: Supreme Court
10 Apr 2026
CJI Surya Kant Warns Against Arbitration Interference
11 Apr 2026
Karnataka HC Orders Lamborghini Owner to Sweep Streets
11 Apr 2026
Higher DA Enhancement for Serving Employees Than DR for Pensioners Violates Article 14: Supreme Court
11 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.