Case Law
Subject : Public Interest Litigation - Administrative Law
Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court has issued a series of stringent directives to both the state and central governments to ensure the complete and effective implementation of the Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act, 2019. Hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the court underscored the need for a more concerted effort to curb the sale and availability of e-cigarettes.
The division bench, comprising Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjeet Purohit , passed the order in the case of Priyansha Gupta vs Union Of India after acknowledging that despite some initial steps, "much is required to be done" to enforce the nationwide ban.
The writ petition, filed as a PIL, sought the court's intervention for the strict enforcement of the Prohibition Of Electronic Cigarettes (Production, Manufacture, Import, Export, Transport, Sale, Distribution, Storage and Advertisement) Act, 2019 . During the hearing on September 18, 2025, an Additional Superintendent of Police present in court conceded that while some e-cigarettes had been seized and the Central Government had initiated the blocking of certain websites, these measures were insufficient to achieve the objectives of the Act.
Observing the gaps in enforcement, the High Court directed the state machinery to formulate and execute a comprehensive action plan. The key directives issued to the Government of Rajasthan include:
The court has mandated the state to file a detailed compliance report outlining the specific steps taken in each district before the next hearing.
The bench also turned its attention to the role of the central government in curbing the online sale and promotion of e-cigarettes. The counsel for the Union of India has been instructed to file a report detailing:
This interim order signifies a major push from the judiciary to ensure that the legislative ban on e-cigarettes translates into a ground-level reality. By mandating a multi-tiered enforcement mechanism involving the DGP and District Collectors, the court aims to create a robust framework for compliance. The call for detailed reports from both state and central authorities establishes clear accountability.
The matter has been listed for the next hearing on November 12, 2025 , by which date the compliance reports are expected to be on record. The outcome of this PIL could set a precedent for how other states address the challenge of enforcing the e-cigarette ban.
#ECigaretteBan #RajasthanHighCourt #PublicHealthLaw
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.