Case Law
Subject : Public Interest Litigation - Administrative Law
Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court has issued a series of stringent directives to both the state and central governments to ensure the complete and effective implementation of the Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act, 2019. Hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the court underscored the need for a more concerted effort to curb the sale and availability of e-cigarettes.
The division bench, comprising Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjeet Purohit , passed the order in the case of Priyansha Gupta vs Union Of India after acknowledging that despite some initial steps, "much is required to be done" to enforce the nationwide ban.
The writ petition, filed as a PIL, sought the court's intervention for the strict enforcement of the Prohibition Of Electronic Cigarettes (Production, Manufacture, Import, Export, Transport, Sale, Distribution, Storage and Advertisement) Act, 2019 . During the hearing on September 18, 2025, an Additional Superintendent of Police present in court conceded that while some e-cigarettes had been seized and the Central Government had initiated the blocking of certain websites, these measures were insufficient to achieve the objectives of the Act.
Observing the gaps in enforcement, the High Court directed the state machinery to formulate and execute a comprehensive action plan. The key directives issued to the Government of Rajasthan include:
The court has mandated the state to file a detailed compliance report outlining the specific steps taken in each district before the next hearing.
The bench also turned its attention to the role of the central government in curbing the online sale and promotion of e-cigarettes. The counsel for the Union of India has been instructed to file a report detailing:
This interim order signifies a major push from the judiciary to ensure that the legislative ban on e-cigarettes translates into a ground-level reality. By mandating a multi-tiered enforcement mechanism involving the DGP and District Collectors, the court aims to create a robust framework for compliance. The call for detailed reports from both state and central authorities establishes clear accountability.
The matter has been listed for the next hearing on November 12, 2025 , by which date the compliance reports are expected to be on record. The outcome of this PIL could set a precedent for how other states address the challenge of enforcing the e-cigarette ban.
#ECigaretteBan #RajasthanHighCourt #PublicHealthLaw
Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Prevail Over Detention Period Claims: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
11 Mar 2026
Failure to Pay Compensation Vitiates Limitation Claims in Land Acquisition: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
04 Mar 2026
Discretionary Nature of Section 143-A NI Act: J&K&L High Court Upholds Interim Compensation Based on Accused's Conduct
12 Jun 2026
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.