Case Law
Subject : Constitutional Law - Fundamental Rights
ERNAKULAM: The Kerala High Court has issued a significant judgment affirming the rights of persons with disabilities to worship in temples, directing the Devaswom Boards to formulate guidelines for ensuring "reasonable accommodation" and "priority in access" for disabled devotees. The Division Bench, comprising Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V and Justice K.V. Jayakumar, emphasized that such measures are not a matter of charity but a "statutory and constitutional mandate."
The court's decision came in a suo motu case (DBP NO. 25 OF 2024) initiated after receiving a complaint from T. Suganthi, a Chartered Accountant who uses a wheelchair due to poliomyelitis.
The proceedings were triggered by a complaint from Ms. T. Suganthi, who detailed the difficulties she faced at the Sree Vadakkumnathan Temple in Thrissur on February 1, 2024. Temple authorities insisted she leave her personal wheelchair at the outer entrance, informing her that wheelchairs were not permitted inside the Nalambalam (the inner sanctum area), thereby preventing her from having a proper darshan (viewing of the deity). Her plea was for a policy that would allow wheelchair access within temples for differently-abled devotees.
The various Devaswom Boards, responsible for temple administration, presented arguments highlighting practical and religious challenges:
The High Court meticulously balanced the religious freedoms guaranteed under Article 25 of the Constitution with the statutory rights enshrined in the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016 .
The bench observed that the RPwD Act, enacted to fulfill India's commitment to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, aims to ensure full and effective participation, non-discrimination, and accessibility for disabled individuals. The judgment highlighted that "public buildings," as defined in the Act, explicitly include places of religious activity.
The court stated:
"Upon a careful reading of the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, we are of the considered view that, to give full effect to the guarantees of equality, dignity, and non-discrimination embodied therein, persons with disabilities must be afforded appropriate and reasonable accommodations and be accorded priority in access to facilities and services. Such measures are not a matter of charity but a statutory and constitutional mandate designed to secure substantive equality."
The judgment underscored that Section 3 of the RPwD Act prohibits discrimination on the grounds of disability and mandates the government to ensure "reasonable accommodation."
Finding that the Devaswom Boards are duty-bound to facilitate darshan for persons with disabilities, the High Court disposed of the case with a set of comprehensive directions. The court ordered the boards to formulate broad guidelines within four months, taking the following actions:
This landmark ruling reinforces the principle that religious traditions must evolve to accommodate the constitutional guarantees of equality and dignity, ensuring that sacred spaces are accessible to all devotees, irrespective of their physical abilities.
#DisabilityRights #TempleAccess #KeralaHighCourt
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.