RTI Act: Spouses Entitled to 'Generic' Income Details of Partner in Maintenance Cases, Rules Central Information Commission - 2025-04-16

Laws, Courts & Judgments.

CIC Directs LIC to Disclose Husband's 'Generic Income' Details to Wife in Maintenance Case Under RTI Act

New Delhi – In a significant order concerning the Right to Information (RTI) Act and spousal information rights in maintenance cases, the Central Information Commission (CIC), presided by Information Commissioner Vinod Kumar Tiwari , has directed the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to provide "generic details" of a husband's income to his estranged wife. This decision came in response to a second appeal filed by Archana Singh against LIC, after she was denied information regarding her husband, Manoj Singh 's salary and income details.

Case Background: Seeking Husband's Income Details for Maintenance

Archana Singh had filed an RTI application with LIC seeking details of her husband, Manoj Singh 's gross salary, incentive bonuses, and vehicle allowance for multiple financial years. Manoj Singh is employed as a Development Officer with LIC. The Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of LIC denied the information, citing Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts disclosure of personal information of a third party. Dissatisfied , Ms. Singh approached the CIC in a second appeal after her first appeal also failed to yield results.

Arguments Presented

Appellant's ( Archana Singh ) Arguments:

Ms. Singh argued that the information was crucial for her ongoing maintenance case in court. She highlighted that previous orders from the CIC in similar cases (CIC/MP/A/2014/001218 and CIC/LICOI/A/2019/162743) had directed disclosure of salary information in comparable situations. She also pointed out a Madras High Court order (W.P.(MD) NO. 15513 OF 2020) which supported providing income details for maintenance purposes. Furthermore, she alleged bias on the part of the current CPIO, claiming prior association with her husband.

Respondent's (LIC) Arguments:

LIC maintained that a husband and wife are considered separate entities under the RTI Act, thus making the husband a 'third party.' They argued that the requested information was rightly denied under Sections 8(1)(e) and 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, concerning fiduciary relationships and personal information. LIC stated that consent was sought from Mr. Manoj Singh , who refused to provide it. They also mentioned that a maintenance amount was already being deducted from Mr. Singh 's salary. LIC contended that they had partially complied with previous CIC orders by providing some older salary information.

CIC's Observations and Decision

The Commission, after considering the facts and hearing both sides, acknowledged the appellant's need for income information to pursue her maintenance case. The CIC noted the ongoing matrimonial dispute and the necessity for financial details to determine appropriate maintenance.

The order stated: "The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case and in furtherance of hearing proceedings, directs the Respondent to ascertain Shri Manoj Kumar is legally wedded husband of the appellant and there is a maintenance case/matrimonial case pending before the judicial Court."

The CIC directed LIC to verify the marital status and the pendency of a maintenance case. Upon submission of relevant litigation documents by Ms. Singh within one week, LIC was instructed to provide "only the ‘generic details of the net taxable income/gross income’ of Appellant’s estranged husband for the period as mentioned in the RTI application, free of cost, within three weeks."

Implications of the Order

This order clarifies the scope of information disclosure under the RTI Act in cases involving maintenance disputes. It establishes that while detailed personal financial information may be exempt, "generic details of net taxable income/gross income" of a spouse can be provided when it is necessary for a legitimate purpose like seeking maintenance and upon verification of a pending maintenance case. This ruling balances the right to information with personal privacy, ensuring that the RTI Act can be effectively used to secure necessary information for legal proceedings, particularly in matrimonial and maintenance matters. The First Appellate Authority of LIC has been directed to ensure compliance with this order.