Case Law
Subject : Right to Information - Public Authority Compliance
New Delhi – The Central Information Commission (CIC) has disposed of an appeal filed by Sunita Jangid against the North Western Railway, ruling that the information provided by the railway authorities was appropriate and in accordance with the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. The Commission found no grounds for intervention in the matter.
The decision, delivered by Information Commissioner Vinod Kumar Tiwari, brings to a close a second appeal concerning information sought by Jangid regarding action taken on her complaint dated January 7, 2022.
The case originated from an RTI application filed by Sunita Jangid on September 27, 2023. She sought specific documents related to a representation she had submitted to the General Manager of North Western Railway. Her primary requests included:
The Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the North Western Railway provided a response, supplying a copy of her complaint but stating that specific file notings were not available as the matter was sub-judice. They added that her representation was considered, which contributed to her eventual promotion.
Dissatisfied with what she termed "irrelevant and misleading information," Jangid filed a first appeal. The First Appellate Authority (FAA) upheld the CPIO's response and provided additional documents. Still feeling aggrieved, Jangid escalated the matter to the CIC with a second appeal.
During the hearing, the appellant's representative argued that the core information—specifically the file notings and comments from senior officials—was never provided. They contended that the railway's response was evasive.
The appellant also raised a significant procedural issue, alleging that a previous offer by the CPIO to inspect documents was misleading. The invitation letter for an inspection on February 13, 2023, was posted on February 15 and received on February 16, making it impossible to comply.
In its defense, the North Western Railway submitted that a point-wise reply with all available information had been provided to the appellant. They clarified that while the DRM had not made any comments directly on the representation itself, details of all subsequent actions, which included the DRM's inputs, were shared. The respondent reiterated their offer for the appellant to inspect any available records. The appellant's representative confirmed that an inspection had since taken place but expressed continued dissatisfaction.
After reviewing the records and hearing both parties, Information Commissioner Vinod Kumar Tiwari observed that the respondent had furnished an appropriate reply. The judgment noted that responses were provided via letters dated November 7, 2023, December 26, 2023, and a final written submission on August 22, 2025.
The Commission concluded that the responses were in line with the provisions of the RTI Act and upheld them. "The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing both the parties and perusal of the records observes that as far as RTI application is concerned appropriate reply has been furnished by the Respondents," the order stated.
Finding no reason to intervene further, the Commission disposed of the appeal, effectively closing the case in favor of the North Western Railway.
#RTIAct #CICDecision #InformationCommission
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.