207 Advocates Unlock Supreme Court Gateway: June 2025 AOR Exam Results Unveiled

In a significant boost for India's legal talent pool, the Supreme Court of India has announced the results of its prestigious Advocates-on-Record (AOR) Examination held in June 2025 . Out of numerous aspirants, 207 candidates have successfully cleared the rigorous test , positioning them to register as AORs—the elite advocates authorized to file cases, submit pleadings, and shoulder procedural responsibilities before the nation's highest court. The results, published by the Registrar (Judicial) & Secretary of the Board of Examiners , also outline opportunities for others to re-appear under specific regulations.

The Gold Standard of Supreme Court Practice

The AOR designation is no ordinary badge; it's a hallmark of expertise in Supreme Court litigation. Only AORs can institute proceedings, file vakalatnamas , and ensure compliance with the court's exacting procedural rules. The exam, one of the toughest in the legal domain, evaluates candidates on drafting skills, professional ethics , substantive law , and procedural nuances. Eligibility demands years of practice and supervised training under a senior AOR, underscoring the Supreme Court 's commitment to upholding the highest standards.

This year's results reflect that rigor: while 207 triumphed, dozens more earned second chances through merciful provisions in the Supreme Court Rules.

Spotlight on the Successful 207

Leading the pack is Mr. Vikram Aditya Narayan (Roll No. 27) , followed by Ms. C. Rubavathi (29) , Mr. Rishabh Choraria (2) , and others like Mr. Vipul Agrawal (145) and Ms. Ninni Susan Thomas (175) . The full list spans advocates from diverse backgrounds, culminating with Mr. Ajit Singh (207) . These newly qualified AORs can now advance to formal registration, transforming their careers and bolstering the apex court's roster of competent practitioners.

Second Chances: Navigating Regulations 11(i) and 11(ii)

Not all paths end at the first hurdle. The results highlight candidates eligible for re-examination under Regulation 11(i) —those who scored 60% aggregate in other papers but fell short of 50% in one. For instance, Mr. Sudhindra Tripathi (23) and Ms. Akansha Lal (30) top this group of 63. Success in the re-attempt, paired with prior scores, could secure passage if the overall aggregate hits 60%.

Under Regulation 11(ii) , candidates who passed all papers but missed the 60% aggregate can re-sit one paper. Names like Mr. Harsh Nitin Gokhale (181) and Ms. Aimen Reshi (238) feature here, offering a targeted shot at qualification. These provisions balance strictness with fairness, allowing capable advocates to refine their edge.

Paving the Way for Apex Court Litigation

Clearing the AOR exam isn't just a personal victory—it's a game-changer for Supreme Court practice. New AORs gain the prestige and authority to independently represent clients at the pinnacle of Indian justice, from constitutional challenges to high-stakes appeals. As the legal landscape evolves, these 207 join a distinguished lineage, ensuring procedural precision and ethical advocacy in an increasingly complex docket.

For the broader fraternity, the results signal the Supreme Court 's ongoing emphasis on meritocracy. Aspirants eyeing future exams can draw lessons from this cycle's outcomes, while successful candidates gear up for a demanding yet rewarding frontier.

Key Observations:

"RESULT OF THE ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD EXAMINATION —JUNE, 2025 LIST OF THE CANDIDATES WHO HAVE PASSED IN THE EXAMINATION"

"LIST OF THE CANDIDATES WHO ARE ELIGIBLE TO RE-APPEAR UNDER REGULATION 11(i) "

" Regulation 11(i) allows a candidate who has failed to obtain 50 per cent in one paper, but has secured an aggregate of 60 per cent in the remaining papers, to appear for that paper in a subsequent exam."

This announcement closes one chapter for hundreds while opening doors to the hallowed halls of the Supreme Court.