AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Welspun Speciality Solutions Ltd v. ONGC (2021 SCC Online SC 1053)
  • Main points: The Court emphasized that the mere inclusion of a contractual clause prescribing a specific time does not automatically make time the essence of the contract. The determination hinges on the surrounding circumstances and the nature of the agreement. If time is not deemed essential, liquidated damages cannot be awarded solely based on contractual clauses. The Court also highlighted the importance of interpreting entire contracts collectively and considering contextual factors.
  • Insights: The judgment clarifies that contractual stipulations about time must be viewed in context; not all deadlines are inherently critical unless expressly made so or implied by circumstances. This approach prevents automatic enforcement of liquidated damages where time is not fundamental to the agreement 2021 SCC Online SC 1053.

  • Principles from earlier judgments (e.g., Gopirathnam & others 2021 SCC Online SC 825)

  • Main points: The Court reiterated that specific performance is generally the default remedy, with refusal being an exception. The value appreciation in real estate is a relevant factor but does not override contractual obligations unless specified.
  • Insights: The emphasis remains on the primacy of contractual terms and the importance of considering all relevant judgments to discern legal principles 2021 SCC Online SC 825.

  • Contract interpretation and surrounding circumstances

  • Main points: The collective reading of entire contracts and surrounding circumstances is essential to ascertain the true intention of parties, especially regarding deadlines and damages.
  • Insights: This holistic approach prevents rigid application of contractual clauses and ensures equitable interpretation aligned with actual intentions 2021 SCC Online SC 1053.

  • Damages and time as a contractual element

  • Main points: When time is not the essence of a contract, liquidated damages are not automatically applicable. The Court considers whether breach of time materially affects contractual obligations.
  • Insights: This prevents unwarranted claims for damages where delay does not fundamentally breach the contractual purpose 2021 SCC Online SC 1053.

  • Related legal principles (e.g., from SCC cases on contractual obligations and damages)

  • Main points: The Court underscores the importance of context, contractual intent, and nature of obligations in awarding damages or specific performance.
  • Insights: These principles guide courts to assess whether contractual deadlines are critical and to interpret clauses accordingly Various SCC references.

Analysis and Conclusion:
The 2021 SCC Online SC 1053 judgment in Welspun Speciality Solutions Ltd v. ONGC reinforces that contractual deadlines are not automatically deemed the essence unless explicitly stated or clearly implied by circumstances. Courts must interpret contracts holistically, considering the entire agreement and context, to determine the significance of time and the appropriateness of damages. This approach ensures fair adjudication, preventing rigid enforcement where delays are not material, and aligns legal remedies with the true intent of contracting parties.

Search Results for "2021 Scc Online Sc 1053"

U.  Monisha VS South India Scheduled Tribes Welfare Association, (Reg. No. 205/1972), Rep. by its Secretary, Chitra Kannan

2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 234 India - Madras

SCC online SC 1053]. ... Gopirathnam(Died) & others [2021 SCC Online SC 825], wherein it has considered all the earlier judgments, and to our mind, the following are the salient principles laid down: (a) The normal rule is to grant specific performance and refusal would be an exception; (b) The increase in the real estate value ... Murugesan [2021 (12) SCALE 77] (C.A. Nos. 2491-2492 dated 07/10/2021) held as follows : “26. These phrases are borrowed ....

District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.  Begusarai VS Anuradha Devi, wife of Late Ashok Kumar Singh

2022 0 Supreme(Pat) 40 India - Patna

SANJAY KAROL, S. KUMAR

114; (2013) 12 SCC 210; 2021 SCC Online SC 1078; (2020 ... 1968 SC 1053; (1983) 1 SCC 305; (2013) 12 SCC 210; 1987 Supp (1) SCC 228; (1992) 4 SCC 118; 2013) 2 SCC 516; (2014) 2 SCC ... Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, (2013) 12 SCC 210; Veena Pandey versus Union of India & Others, 2021 SCC Online SC 1078] 7. ... Ranojirao Shinde [AI....

M.  Vairamudi VS J.  Jayalakshmi

2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 50 India - Madras

T.RAJA, D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

Welspun Speciality Solutions Ltd -Vs- Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., 2021 SCC online SC 1053) has held that the mere clause in the agreement prescribing a time by itself would not make the time as the essence of contract, but, it has to be determined by the attendant circumstances of the case ... Even in the second reply notice dated 05/10/2021, the defendant contended that the plaintiff is not willing to pay the balance of Rs. 17 lakhs, no whisper is made about any forgery or fraud played. ... O....

Ramachandiran Vs E.ganesh

2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2533 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

V.SIVAGNANAM, J

According to the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2021 SCC Online SC 1053 (Welspun Speciality Solution Ltd. Vs. O N G C), it was held that the collective reading of the entire contract and the surrounding circumstances is imperative to come to such a conclusion. ... (1997) 3 SCC 1 (K.S.Vidyanadam and others Vs. Vairavan) 12.

M/s. CHENNAI METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD vs M/s.GKC VISHWA CONSORTIUM

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 66338 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J

2024 (2) SCC 375 ; b) Colles Cranes of India Ltd. Vs. Speedeo Spares Corporation of India reported in 1969 SCC Online 40; c) Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. M/s.Ramkumar Mills Pvt. ... reported in 2008 SCC Online Bom 488; d) ONGC Ltd. Vs. Saw Pipes Ltd. , reported in 2003 (5) SCC 705; e) K.S. Oils Ltd. Vs. State Trade Corporation of India Ltd. reported in [2006 (11) SCC 181], the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that it is normal for the parties to proclaim th....

Sushil Kumar Tiwari VS State Of U. P.

2021 0 Supreme(All) 1245 India - Allahabad

And 3 Others, 2021 (6) ADJ 23, Priyanshu (Minor) vs. State of U.P. And 5 Others, 2021 (7) ADJ 438, Vahin Saxena (Minor Corpus) and another Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2021 SCC OnLine All 593 and Reshu @ Nitya and others Vs. ... State (NCT of Delhi), 2004 SCC OnLine Del 699, relied upon by the appellant]. It is not necessary to multiply the authorities on this proposition. 46. ... State of U.P. and 3 others, 2021 (2) ADJ 320, Master Manan @ Arush vs....

Mmtc Limited VS Aust Grain Exports Pty.  Ltd.

2023 0 Supreme(Del) 1703 India - Delhi

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH

, (2022) 2 SCC 382 : 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1053 des that as time was not the essence, liquidated damages could not be granted, in the following manner: "Since time was not the essence of the contract, the measure of damages specified under clause liquidated ... , 2023 SCC OnLine Bom 966 it was held as follows: "29. ... The discussion in SCC OnLine Del para 103 of the impugned judgment [DMRC v. Delhi Airport Metro Express (P) Ltd., 20....

Samri Lal, son of Late Mishri Lal Balmiki VS State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand

2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 784 India - Jharkhand

RAJESH SHANKAR

State Election Commission (2019 SCC OnLine Pat. 1715) - State of Maharashtra & Others v. ... The State of Jharkhand & Others (2017 SCC OnLine Jhar 3038) - Ritesh Tewari & Another v. ... State of Maharashtra & Others (2021) 9 SCC 804 - Lillykutty v. ... The State of Jharkhand & Others reported in 2017 SCC OnLine Jhar 3038 wherein it has been held that the time limit prescribed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court is directive in nature depending upon various ....

Sanjib Das S/o.  Lt.  Jatin Das VS Union of India Rep.  by The Ministry of Finance, Deptt.  of Revenue, New Delhi

2022 0 Supreme(Gau) 284 India - Gauhati

DEVASHIS BARUAH

cause reply, respondent adjudicating authority, i.e., respondent is directed to offer petitioner an opportunity of hearing either online ... On the said date, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the GST Department have placed a clarification dated 11.11.2021 whereby the Master Circular No.1053/02/2017-CX dated 10.03.2017 was clarified. ... In this regard it is relevant to note that vide communication dated 23.03.2022, the petitioner was informed that he may appear for personal hearing either online or physical in ....

Sanjib Das VS Union Of India

2022 0 Supreme(Gau) 1348 India - Gauhati

DEVASHIS BARUAH

30 days before the adjudicating authority, and directed the authority to offer the petitioner an opportunity of hearing either online ... Finding of the Court: The Court held that the Circular dated 11.11.2021 clarified the Master Circular and operated ... Adjudication and Recovery - Central Excise Act, 1944 - Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 - Section 73, 75, 77, 78 - Circular dated 11.11.2021 ... On the said date, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the GST Department have placed a clarification dated 11.11.2021#HL_....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top