1. Rajendra alias Vijai VS State - 21 Jul 82

Arm shown to terrorise victim may be deemed to have been used in the incident.

(P.W. 1) it does not appear that at the time of commission of the offence he (Dharam Pal Vij) was able to see that Jai Singh had ... the learned counsel have been sufficiently answered by the trial judge when he says: Placing reliance on the statement of Dharam Pal Vij

India - Crimes

2. Steel Authority of India Ltd. VS State - 25 Nov 14

Burden will be on partners to show that they were not in charge of affairs of firm, standard of proof would be on preponderance of probabilities and not beyond reasonable doubt.

Dinesh Vij. ... Dinesh Vij. ... Dinesh Vij and Mr.

India - Current Civil Cases

3. Steel Authority of India Ltd. VS State - 25 Nov 14

Burden will be on partners to show that they were not in charge of affairs of firm, standard of proof would be on preponderance of probabilities and not beyond reasonable doubt.

Dinesh Vij. ... Dinesh Vij. ... Dinesh Vij.

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

4. Steel Authority of India Ltd. VS State - 25 Nov 14

Capital Industries/Respondent No.3 - D.Vij was not actively involved in the affairs of the firm - Two defence witnesses had created ... the firm at the relevant time - Trial Court observed that neither the invoices nor the delivery notes bore the signatures of D.Vij ... for the affairs of the firm was only hearsay because he obviously had no personal knowledge - Benefit of doubt was granted - D.Vij ... Dinesh Vij. ... Dinesh Vij. ... Dinesh Vij and Mr.

India - Delhi

5. Neha Sharma VS Neeraj Sharma - 07 Jul 15

ftyk U;k;ky;@eq[; U;kf;d eftLV~sV@vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLV~sV@U;kf;d eftLV~sV@vij U;kf;d eftLV~sV U;k;ky; dks iznku dh tkrh ... NksM+dj 'ks"k jktLo ftyk {ks= dh ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; dh 'kfDr;ka ,oa {ks=kf/kdkfjrk] lacaf/kr LFkkuh; {ks=kf/kdkj okys ftyk U;k;ky;@vij

India - Rajasthan

6. Kamla Bai VS State of M. P. - 04 Jan 11

¼3½ Hkw&jktLo lafgrk] 1959 ¼e-iz-½ & /kkjk 11 rFkk 17 ¼2½ & dyDVj & vij ... dyDVj dks iqujh{k.k dh lquokbZ djus dh vf/kdkfjrk gS & vij dyDVj }kjk iqujh{k.k esa ikfjr vkns‘k & vf/kdkfjrk jfgr ugha gSA ¼iSjk

India - Madhya Pradesh

7. Manohari VS State of Rajasthan - 21 Dec 82

vij eqaflQ ,oa U;kf;d eft- izFke oxZ ckanhdqbZ ¼jkt-½ Sd/- vfHk;qDr dks fnukad 26-5-82 dks isk djsa o esfMdy iw.kZ----------¼vLi"V½ ,l-Mh- vij

India - Rajasthan

8. Anurag Mishra VS Rajkumar @ Raju Sharma - 21 Feb 18

¼1½ iqujh{k.k & 'kfä;ksa dh O;kfIr & iqtkjh dh fu;qfä ds fo#) vihy & dyDVj ds le{k yafcr & dyDVj ds varfje vkns'k ds fo#) vij ... vk;qä ds le{k iqujh{k.k & ekeyk dyDVj dks izfrizsf"kr djus dh izkFkZuk & vij vk;qä }kjk iqujh{k.k vafre :i ls fofuf'pr & tc vihy ... iqujh{k.k dh O;kfIr lnSo fHkUu gS & iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; us viuh vf/kdkfjrk dk vfrØe.k fd;k gS ,oa vf/kdkfjrk fo"k;d =qfV dh gS & vij

India - Madhya Pradesh

9. Rajkumar Shivhare VS Anand Kumar Tiwari - 10 May 00

¼4½ Hkw&jktLo lafgrk] 1959 ¼e-iz-½ && /kkjk 172 && dyDVj dh ‘kfDr && vij

India - Madhya Pradesh

10. State of M. P. VS Anandram - 14 Aug 98

ls‘ku U;k;k/kh‘k vf/kfu;e ds v/khu fo‘ks"k U;k;k/kh‘k ds :i esa fu;qDr && lafgrk ds v/khu vij ls‘ku U;k;k/kh‘k dh mldh izfLFkfr ... ls‘ku U;k;k/kh‘k ds le{k j[ks x, nkafMd ekeys] vihysa vFkok vkosnu && vij ls‘ku U;k;k/kh‘k }kjk bUdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA ¿ iSjk ... nbsp;¼2½ vuqlwfpr tkfr vkSj vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1989 && /kkjk 14 && naM izfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 && /kkjk 9¼3½ vij

India - Madhya Pradesh