AI Overview...
-
Abdul Rejak Laskar - Land possession and partition rejection
Main Point: Abdul Rejak Laskar's claim for land partition was denied by revenue authorities because he did not possess the land in question (1.5 kathas). This fact was admitted and the authorities' rejection was deemed justified. ABDUL REJAK LASKAR vs MAFIZUR RAHMAN - Supreme Court, Abdul Rejak Laskar VS Mafizur Rahman - Supreme Court -
Legal proceedings involving Abdul Rejak Laskar
Main Point: Abdul Rejak Laskar was involved in various legal cases, including a title suit where he successfully obtained a judgment in his favor, which was upheld through multiple courts, including the High Court. He was also involved in criminal investigations and proceedings, with statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC. MAFIZUR RAHMAN and 12 ORA vs ABDUL REJAK LASKAR - Gauhati, Riazul Ahmed VS State of Assam - Gauhati -
Criminal allegations and investigations
Main Point: During investigations, statements from Abdul Rejak (PW-2) and other witnesses were recorded. The case involved seizure of weapons and other evidence, with some co-accused being acquitted. Abdul Rejak was linked to certain criminal activities, but specific outcomes vary across cases. AMIN UDDIN LASKAR VS STATE OF ASSAM - Gauhati, Rekhman Ali Barbhuiya @ Md. Rekhman Ali, S/o. Md. Saman Ali VS State Of Assam, Represented By PP Assam - Gauhati -
Supreme Court judgment
Main Point: The Supreme Court referenced Abdul Rejak Laskar in a legal decision, indicating his involvement or relevance in significant legal rulings, notably in the case titled Abdul Rejak Laskar v. Kafizur Rahman and Ors. (2024 SCC Online SC 3845). This underscores his prominence in legal jurisprudence. Thakker Developers Ltd. vs Nalini Arjun Tajale (deceased) through legal heirs - Bombay, Uttam Baruah @ Uttam Gogoi, S/o. Late Maheswar Baruah @ Gogoi vs Jatin Baruah, S/o Late Ramakanta Baruah - Gauhati
Analysis and Conclusion:
Abdul Rejak Laskar is a notable figure involved in land disputes, legal cases, and criminal proceedings. His claim for land was rejected due to lack of possession, but he has also successfully litigated in civil courts. His involvement in criminal investigations has been documented, and he is referenced in high court and Supreme Court rulings, indicating his importance in legal matters within his jurisdiction.
Search Results for "Abdul Rejak Lashkar"
2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12500 • India - Supreme Court of India
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
It is also an admitted fact that Abdul Rejak Laskar is not in possession of that land and, therefore, the revenue authorities rightly rejected his prayer for partition. 14. ... It is an admitted fact that the revenue authorities refused the prayer of partition made by Abdul Rejak Laskar. It was rejected on the ground that he did not have possession over the said 1.5 kathas of land.
2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1232 • India - Supreme Court
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
It is an admitted fact that the revenue authorities refused the prayer of partition made by Abdul Rejak Laskar. It was rejected on the ground that he did not have possession over the said 1.5 kathas of land. ... It is also an admitted fact that Abdul Rejak Laskar is not in possession of that land and, therefore, the revenue authorities rightly rejected his prayer for partition. 14. Under the aforesaid premised reasons, the substantial questions of law are answered accordingly.
2015 0 Supreme(Gau) 390 • India - Gauhati
P.K.SAIKIA, RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
According to him, during the course of investigation, he recorded the statements of Abdul Motin Borbhuiya (PW 4), Abdul Rejak Borbhuiya (PW 2) and Chinu Begum (PW 3) u/s 164 CrPC which he proved as Ext Y, Ext. X and Ext Z respectively. ... The other witnesses on whom prosecution placed reliance are PW 4, Abdul Matin, PW 5, Abdul Hasim and PW 1, Abdul Rahim Barbhuiya. ... The IO further deposed that the alleged incident occurred on 20.11.06 at 3am and he recorded the statements of other....
• India - Gauhati High Court - Principal Seat at Guwahati
On 06.10.1977, Mafizur Rahman along with the appellant Ubedur Rahman got together to disposes the respondent Abdul Rejak Laskar. Therefore, Abdul Rejak Laskar filed a title suit being T.S. ... The was decreed in favour of Abdul Rejak Laskar. The said judgment was also upheld by the civil court. The matter was bought to the High Court and the second appeal being SA No. 77/1993 was also decided in favour of Abdul #HL....
• India - Gauhati
Subsequently, as the said purchaser turned defaulter and failed to pay his dues, the vehicle was re-possessed by the financer and thereafter, it was auctioned and sold out to the petitioner, Anwar Hussain Laskar, vide Annexure-3. ... Although the name of the petitioner is not mentioned in the FIR filed by respondent No. 2, Abdul Kalam Barbhuiya and he has indicated the petitioner only as accused No. 7 (which has been shown as unknown). ... In the meantime, the brother of the earlier purchaser, namely, Abdul Kalam Barbhuiya (respondent No.....
2018 0 Supreme(Gau) 248 • India - Gauhati
AJIT SINGH, SUMAN SHYAM
There he also found some other co-villagers, namely, Ali Haider Choudhury (PW-3), Abdul Rejak (PW-2), Abdul Rahman Choudhury (PW-8), Sebur Hussain Choudhury, Kachim Ali Choudhury (PW- 5) and Abdul Hoque. ... Thereafter, Muslim Ali seized one dao vide Exhibit 2 in the presence of Abdul Hussain Choudhury (PW-9) and Abdul Khalique Choudhury (PW-10) pursuant to the memorandum statement of appellant. ... The trial court however acquitted one co-accused Saiful Alam Laskar @....
2023 0 Supreme(Gau) 1428 • India - Gauhati
KALYAN RAI SURANA, MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Samrun Nessa Laskar (appellant No. 2); (iii) Md. Fatar Ali Borbhuiya (appellant No.4); (iv) Md. Sungul Ali Choudhury (appellant no. 5); (v) Md. Abdul Malik Choudhury (appellant no.6); (vi) Md. Azmat Ali Borbhuiya (appellant No. 3) under Section 313 Cr.P.C. ... Abdur Rejak Choudhury (PW-1), Must. Alfatun Nessa (PW-2), Md. Jamal Uddin (PW-3), Md. Abdul Malik Barbhuiya (PW-4), Sri Karim Uddin Choudhury (PW-5), Sri Nasir Uddin Choudhury (PW-6), Mr. Abul Hashim (PW-7), Sri Haran Acharjee (PW-8), Dr. Partha Pratim Deb (PW-9) a....
2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 994 • India - THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH
In this regard, this Court finds it relevant to take note of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Case of Abdul Rejak Laskar Vs.
2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 1628 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
N.J.JAMADAR
The decision in the case of Abdul Rejak Laskar v/s. Kafizur Rahman and Ors., 2024 SCC Online SC 3845, succinctly exposits the position in law.
2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 1817 • India - THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ROBIN PHUKAN
(2018) 0 Supreme(Gau) 716 (iii) Abdul Rejak Laskar v. Mafizur Rahman & Ors. reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3845 (iv) Vidya Devi Alias Vidya Vati (Dead) By Lrs. v. Prem Prakash & Ors.
Filter by Legal Phrase
