AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The necessity of filing an abetment petition is contingent upon the nature of the offence and the involvement of respondents. When more than three respondents are involved, or when the act does not demonstrate instigation or encouragement, an abetment petition may not be required. Courts consistently stress that specific averments and proof of active instigation are essential to establish abetment. Therefore, in cases where these elements are absent, especially with multiple respondents, the law recognizes that an abetment petition might be unnecessary.

Search Results for "Abetment Petition is Not Necessary if more than Three Different Respondents"

G. P. Singh VS Santi Ranjan Sarkar

1985 0 Supreme(Cal) 182 India - Calcutta

M.M.Dutt, J.N.CHAUDHURI

Court of abetment of the offence of exacting money without proper authority and sentenced to three months' rigorous imprisonment ... Final Decision: The court set aside the judgment of the lower court and dismissed the respondent's petition. ... The court directed that the respondent's petition for consideration of his sentence be considered by the proper authority within ... THE respondent was charged with abetment of the offence of exacting money ....

Ashok Chandak VS State of A. P.  rep.  by the Public Prosecutor High Court of A. P.

2010 0 Supreme(AP) 402 India - Andhra Pradesh

B.CHANDRA KUMAR

fire accident occurred on it appears that injured were still being treated till date of filing of complaint – Held, They apply to different ... and Section 92 of the Factories Act are one and same - Since it appears that offences with which petitioner is charged with under different ... are one and same both these petitions are being disposed Managing Director of Laboratories - situated at premises - Factory was ... They apply to different situations for different purposes and for different#HL....

P. Nallammal etc.  VS State Rep. by Inspector of Police

India - Crimes

M.B.SHAH, K.T.THOMAS

The legislative intent is manifest that abettors of all the different offences under Section 13(1)(e) of the P.C. ... Act does not contemplate abetment of any of the offences specified in Section 13 of the P.C. Act. ... Centrain illustrations would amplify the cases of abetments fitting each of the three clauses in Section 107 of the IPC vis-a-vis ... It was pointed out by the respondent that the aforesaid decision was chal­lenged before this Court through a special leave pet....

Uday Chilagoudu @ Chilagoudu Udayakumara S/o. Shanmukhappa Vs State Of Karnataka

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 10196 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR, J

... ... Result: All three petitions are allowed, and proceedings quashed. ... abetment, there must be instigation or encouragement with intent to provoke the act of suicide, which was not established in this ... of suicide, claiming no instigation occurred - Court found that mere words 'to go and die' do not constitute abetment - The deceased's ... By referring to the case law decided by this Court wherein similar utterances like, “to go and die” does not constitute ....

State Of U. P.  VS Singhara Singh

1963 0 Supreme(SC) 200 India - Supreme Court

J.C.SHAH, M.HIDAYATULLAH, A.K.SARKAR

Three respondents were prosecuted for the murder. ... The trial court convicted one respondent of murder and the other two of abetment of murder. ... The High Court acquitted all three respondents. The State appealed against the acquittal. ... Seven persons including the three respondents, Singhara Singh, Bir Singh and Tega Singh were prosecuted for this murder. ... It was held, and we think rightly, that Nazir Ahmed s case, 63 Ind App 372 did #HL_ST....

Suraj Karan VS State of Rajasthan

2008 0 Supreme(Raj) 1355 India - Rajasthan

GOVIND MATHUR

306 – Revision allowed held – No prima facie case was made out as there was nothing on record to show that there was any kind of abetment ... 397/401 – The relations between the husband and the wife were not cordial even ... The facts necessary to be noticed are : Revision No.1164/2007 - (Bhakar Ram & Ors. v. ... - Though having different facts, these two revision petitions are founded on similar preposition of law, hence are disposed of by this common order. ... 2. ... These things are essential to c....

R.  Duraimurugan VS State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Valathy Police Station, Villupuram

2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 2136 India - Madras

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 306 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 397 and 401 – Offence of Abetment ... trial Court or before appellate Court, an opportunity has to be given to defense/ accused to summon original document by filing necessary ... same as a Court witness since prosecution appears to have been framing the accused for latches on their part - Criminal Revision Petition ... Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Petition is allowed and the matter is remitted back to learned Additional sessions Judg....

MADAN M. BEHL VS NATIONAL SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION

1971 0 Supreme(Del) 122 India - Delhi

PRITAM SINGH SAFEER

- SPECIFIC AVERMENTS NECESSARY - INDIAN PENAL CODE, SECTIONS 405, 107. ... The complaint against the petitioners did not disclose specific averments of abetment as required under Section 107 of the Indian ... Fact of the Case: The petitioners filed a petition under Section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside ... It was not a case of mere abetment. ... The explanation is contained in this petition as to in which circumstances Shri R. C. Chopra, couns....

P. Nallammal VS State Rep. by Inspector of Police

1999 6 Supreme 516 India - Supreme Court

K.T.THOMAS, M.B.SHAH

Act does not contemplate abetment of any of the offences specified in Section 13 of the P.C. Act. ... The legislative intent is manifest that abettors of all the different offences under Section 13(1)(e) of the P.C. ... Centrain illustrations would amplify the cases of abetments fitting each of the three clauses in Section 107 ... It was pointed out by the respondent that the aforesaid decision was challenged before this Court through a special leave petition and on 1....

K.  Subbiah VS State by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chennai

2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 1855 India - Madras

C.S.KARNAN

120-B r/w 465, 468 r/w 471, 167 - Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13 (2) & 109 IPC - Held, the accused was not ... The defacto complainant was not in the picture - Even though all the accused have retired from service and are receiving government ... pension, there is no disciplinary action against any of them since the case was not proved as per the order of the Home Department ... Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence and where no express provision is made for its pun....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top