AI Overview...
- Causing Death by Hazardous Food - The sources do not directly address causing death through hazardous food. Instead, they focus on cases of murder, grievous hurt, or death due to violence or other causes. V. Ambi Alias Subramania Iyer VS State of Kerala - Kerala, Hazera Khatun VS State of Assam - Gauhati, Kapil VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana, Sudhakar s/o. Sukram Hazare VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Rajesh VS State Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi, Narayan VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, [NAZRUDDIN
VS STATE OF U P -
Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500040587), Sukhchain Singh VS State of Haryana - Crimes
-
Main Points and Insights:
- The court cases primarily involve allegations of murder, grievous hurt, or death caused by physical violence, use of weapons, or circumstantial evidence. For example, in V. Ambi Alias Subramania Iyer VS State of Kerala - Kerala, the appellant was acquitted of causing death under S.302 IPC, but was convicted for causing grievous hurt. In Kapil VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana, guilt was established through witness testimonies and disclosure statements.
- In Hazera Khatun VS State of Assam - Gauhati, suspicion alone was insufficient to prove responsibility for death, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence.
- Several cases (Rajesh VS State Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi, Narayan VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, [NAZRUDDIN
VS STATE OF U P - Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500040587)) highlight the significance of intent, motive, and the nature of injuries in establishing guilt for murder under Section 302 IPC.
- Evidence such as post-mortem reports, witness testimony, and circumstantial evidence played a crucial role in determining guilt.
-
Some cases involve deaths in property disputes or domestic violence, with courts analyzing individual roles and motives.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- None of the provided sources directly relate to a case of death caused by hazardous food. Instead, they predominantly concern deaths resulting from violence, assault, or circumstantial evidence pointing to murder or grievous hurt.
- Therefore, based on these sources, there is no evidence or discussion supporting a conviction of causing death specifically through hazardous food.
- For a conviction related to death caused by hazardous food, specific evidence demonstrating that food poisoning or contamination directly led to death would be necessary, which is not covered in these cases.
References:
V. Ambi Alias Subramania Iyer VS State of Kerala - Kerala, Hazera Khatun VS State of Assam - Gauhati, Kapil VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana, Sudhakar s/o. Sukram Hazare VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Rajesh VS State Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi, Narayan VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, NAZRUDDIN
VS STATE OF U P
- Allahabad, Sukhchain Singh VS State of Haryana - Crimes
Search Results for "Accused Found Guilty of Causing Death of Deceased by Hazard Food"
1960 0 Supreme(Ker) 201 • India - Kerala
ANNA CHANDY, P.GOVINDA MENON
The court found the appellant not guilty and acquitted him of the offence under S.326 I.P.C. for causing grievous hurt to his mother ... Issues: The key issues revolved around establishing the appellant's guilt under S.302 I.P.C. for causing the death of his ... . - The court confirmed the conviction of the appellant under S.302 I.P.C. for causing the death of his wife by cutting her with ... On the date of the incident on 4-1-60, the accu....
2013 0 Supreme(Gau) 299 • India - Gauhati
I.A.ANSARI, P.K.MUSAHARY
Hazara Khatun, might be involved in causing death of Razak fact remains that suspicion, howsoever high, cannot take place of proof ... hanging inside the house of accused-appellant needle of suspicion points to her as person who was possibly responsible for causing ... Appellants – Guilty of Offence – Alleged – Prosecution Case – House of Abdul Rahman brother of Abdul Razak and told him was to accompany ... No doubt, when the dead body had been found hanging inside th....
2019 0 Supreme(P&H) 70 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RAJIV SHARMA, AVNEESH JHINGAN
Finding of the Court: The court found the appellant guilty based on the testimonies of witnesses, disclosure statements ... The disclosure statements made by the accused and the post-mortem examination further supported the prosecution's case. ... The key legal provisions of Sections 302 (murder), 201 (causing disappearance of evidence of offence), and 34 (acts done by several ... The accused were arrested. Accused Kapil was interrogated. He made disclosure statement that he had take....
1986 0 Supreme(P&H) 363 • India - Punjab and Haryana
S.S.DEWAN, K.S.BHALLA
appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. ... The court also found that the appellant's alleged motive to kill his son was not supported by any credible evidence. ... The court also found that the appellant's alleged motive to kill his son was not supported by any credible evidence. ... During the days of this occurrence, Subhash Chander since deceased used to reside with Saraswati Devi accused. On 3.11.1984 Hazari Lal and Chanan Ram came to Angoori Devi and informed her that Subhas....
2005 0 Supreme(Bom) 1243 • India - Bombay
J.N.PATEL, R.C.CHAVAN
a matter where wife is deceased, defence not true, can be connected to complete chain of circumstances. ... Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 3 - Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 498-A and 304B - Death of wife and circumstantial evidence. - In ... It is submitted that the deceased Meera was admittedly residing with them at the time of her death and the conduct of the appellants/accused in causing disappearance of the evidence by throwing her dead body after throttling her to death#....
2018 0 Supreme(Del) 2732 • India - Delhi
S.MURALIDHAR, VINOD GOEL
Finding of the Court: The court found the appellant guilty of murdering his wife under Section 302 IPC based on the ... Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant was responsible for causing the injuries resulting in the death of his wife ... and the cause of death of the twin foetuses of the deceased. ... While PW-1 looked after the tea stall, the deceased was serving food to all the family members. PW-1 admitted that “the decease....
1994 0 Supreme(All) 102 • India - Allahabad
GIRIDHAR MALAVIYA, N.B.ASTHANA
Sushila be killed as she was not speaking the truth, whereupon the appellant fired upon her, causing her injuries. ... Fact of the Case: The appellant was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Amar Singh and causing injuries ... However, the court found that the testimony of PW-6, Hazari, was reliable and corroborated the prosecution's story. ... About a litre free and clotted blood was found present in chest cavity. 100 gms. of semi-digested food was found....
2004 0 Supreme(Raj) 279 • India - Rajasthan
SUNIL KUMAR GARG
It highlighted the intention, knowledge, and motive of the accused, and the nature of the injuries inflicted on the deceased. ... Fact of the Case: The deceased intervened in a dispute and was fatally injured by the accused, who was armed with a ... murder, and exceptions under Sections 299, 300, 302, and 304 IPC to determine the accused's intention, knowledge, and motive in causing ... The guilty intention in the first two conditions contemplates the intended death....
2004 0 Supreme(All) 515 • India - Allahabad
SUSHIL HARKAULI, AMAR SARAN
The deceased was killed in a property dispute, and the court analyzed the evidence to determine the guilt of the accused. ... MURDER - Property Dispute - Section 302, 148, 323/149 IPC - The court found the appellants guilty of murder under Section 302 ... The court also considered the role of each accused in the unlawful assembly and their individual acts in the commission of the offense ... So far as the case of the appellant Nazruddin is concerned he has been assigned the clear and s....
• India - Crimes
R.P.SETHI, DORAISWAMY RAJU
Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302 r/w 34—Offence of causing murder of Raj Karan by accused Balbir and Bishan giving lathi blows ... the offence and were guilty. ... on the head of deceased—Motive was to teach a lesson to deceased for helping Suraj Mal, opponent of accused in land litigation—Occurrence ... As some semi digested food was found in the stomach of the deceased, the High Court held PWs 1 and 2 to be untrustworthy as t....
Filter by Legal Phrase
