1. RAVI SHANKAR PANDEY VS STATE OF M. P. - 22 Feb 88

Delhi 87 and AIR 1985 All. 166 distinguished. ... AIR 1981 Raj 8 dissented from. [Para 7 ... AIR 1970 SC 1039, 1975 JLJ 888, AIR 1977 J & K 1, AIR 1978 P & H 109, AIR 1979 ... C. , Aligarh Muslim University, AIR 1985 All 106 admission to B. Sc. ... Delhi, AIR 1979 Delhi 87, a single Bench held that an educational institution cannot cancel a student's ... 29-1-1985.

India - Madhya Pradesh

2. Nirbhay Narayan Jha VS Alakh Kumar Sinha - 05 Apr 90

AIR 1980 Pat 242, 1984 BBCJ 103 (S.C.), 1985 PLJR 390, 1988 PLJR 950 ... -Relied Upon; S.A. 35/87 (R) - Distinguished. ... Ishrati Amanaullah AIR 1985 PLJR 390 : the rent for June, July and August, 1978 was sent by cheques which were not encashed by the

India - Patna

3. BALWANT VS MAINABAI - 06 Oct 89

AIR 1955 Bom. 447 and 1985 MPWN 431 relied on. ... AIR 1982 Pat. 87, 1987 JLJ 778 and AIR 1949 Nag. 154 relied on. ... [Para 19 ... ... Janki, 1988 MPLJ 28 and Ramanand Thakur's case, AIR 1982 Patna 87. ... Rustomji's case, AIR 1955 Bom 447. ... The decision in Zubeda Khatun's case, 1985 MPWN 437, may also be usefully perused.

India - Madhya Pradesh

4. HINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED VS CAVINKARE LIMITED - 16 Jul 03

84 (Para 13) (1985) Cri LJ 87 (Cal) (Para 4) air 1953 MP 245, 246 : (1953 cri LJ 1675) (FB) motilal Ghose, AIR 1914 Cal 69 : (1913 ... 1991 SC 281 : (1991 Cri LJ 390) (para 8) jiwani Kumari Parekh, AIR 1991 SC 326 : (1991 Cri LJ 471) (Para 6) v. ... Nigam, AIR 1992 SC 2153, 2155 : (1992 Cri LJ 3576) (Para 6) ashok Kumar Singh, (1922) 1 SCC 152 : (1992 Cri LJ 284) (Para 10) manish

India - Calcutta

5. State of Uttaranchal VS Balwant Singh Chaufal - 18 Jan 10

1. Advocate General for the State can be appointed after he/she attains the age of 62 years. Similarly, the Attorney General for India can be appointed after he/she attains the age of 65 years. 2. It is expected from a Hon’ble member of the noble profession not to invoke the jurisdiction of the court in a matter where the controversy itself is no longer res integra. 3. It is the bounden duty of the court to ensure that the controversy once settled by an authoritative judgment should not be reopened unless there are extraordinary reasons for doing so. 4. The Indian Courts by its judicial craftsmanship, creativity and urge to provide access to justice to the deprived, discriminated and otherwise vulnerable sections of society have touched almost every aspect of human life while dealing with cases filed in the label of the public interest litigation. The credibility of the superior courts of India has been tremendously enhanced because of some vital and important directions given by the courts. The courts’ contribution in helping the poorer sections of the society by giving new definition to life and liberty and to protect ecology, environment and forests are extremely significant. 5. The petition which is a clear abuse of the process of law and filed for extraneous considerations and also has the potentiality of demeaning a very important constitutional office, deserves to be discarded and discouraged so that no one in future would attempt to file a similar petition.

(Para 15) ... 2. ... (Para 21) ... 4. ... (Para 35) ... 7. ... Prem Chandra Mishra & Ors. - AIR 2008 SC 913, para 19). ... State of U.P. & Others, 45 AIR 1985 SC 652 the Supreme Court ordered closure of all lime-stone quarries ... The Court in para 15 observed as under: “15. .....

India - Supreme Court

6. GOYAL GRAMODYOG SANSTHAN VS SETH BROTHERS - 23 May 03

Galappa, AIR 1985 SC 577 Ravi Singhal and Ors v. Smt. ... Manali Singhal and Anr. , 87 (2000) DLT 658 (DB) [para 21]; Inspiration Clothes and U v. ... Public Gram -Udyog Samiti, 1985 PTC 85 :1987 [1] arb.

India - Delhi

7. Prabhatsinh Samatsinh VS D. S. P. - 14 May 09

Point in Issue :Whether in the facts of the case conducting three marriages by petitioner amounts to misconduct under Rules?

State of Gujarat & Ors., 1986 (23) GLT 87 [Para 14];; Bodu Tarmamad vs. ... 1985 (1) SLR 598 [Para 16];; Chairman and MD, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. ... State, 1985 (2) GLR 701 [Para 17];; Bhikhudan A. Gadhavi vs. ... Yousuf Miya, AIR 1997 SC 2232, in Para 6 it was stated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as under : Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Meerut, AIR 1984 SC 505, wherein it was observed in Para ... It was held (SCC p. 338 Para 31) “31.

India - Gujarat

8. Sakinabi Sirajuddin Kanchwala VS Shrilal Hansraj Sharma - 02 Feb 10

Behara Venkataramanayya Patro (1985) 1 SCR 651 : (AIR 1984 SC 1728) span id="40003306100110024" name="40003306100110024" ... Sukh Dev, 1987 (Supp) SCC 87, Shah Mathurdas Maganlal and Co. v. ... 2001 SC 2284 in the case of Nirmal Chandra v Vimal Chand the court observed in para 8 and 9 as under : "8.

India - Bombay

9. Radha Kant Yadav VS State Of Bihar - 31 Aug 95

He then referred to the judgment of this Court, reported in AIR

India - Patna

10. Sat Pal Singh Bhatiya VS Basanti Devi - 15 Apr 08

1989 BBCJ 126; 1985: PLJR 727; 1993(1) PLJR 87; 1995 BBCJ 711; 1984 PLJR 207-Referred to. ... (Para 20) ... (Paras 11, 12, 13, 16, 17 and 21) ... AIR 1986 ... Kishun Mistry reported in 1985 P.L.J.R. 727 and in case of Bata India Ltd. ... Qamruzzama reported in 1993 (1) P.L.J.R. 87 as well as in case of Food Corporation of India and Ors.

India - Patna