AI Overview...
-
Case No. 2253/2000 (HNNJ, 8/8/2000) - The petition was scheduled for admission on 2nd August 2000 and again on 22nd August 2000, indicating procedural proceedings related to Cri. P. No. 2253 of 2000 U. SHIVANNA VS L. ANJANAPPA - Karnataka, U. Shivanna VS L. Anjanappa - Crimes.
-
Judicial Decisions Referenced:
- State of Assam (1982) - A case involving a boiler Khalashi found with raw coal, highlighting issues of evidence examination and identification of materials in criminal cases KIRAN CHANDRA DAS VS STATE OF ASSAM - Gauhati.
- State of U.P. (1978, 1969) - Cases emphasizing the importance of evidence, proof beyond reasonable doubt, and the burden of proof on the accused KIRAN CHANDRA DAS VS STATE OF ASSAM - Gauhati.
-
Supreme Court (2006) - Noted that proof by preponderance of probabilities, common in civil law, is also relevant in criminal jurisprudence, and discussed the responsibilities of the press in maintaining order N. M. Yohannan VS P. N. Sabu - Kerala, S. Sudin VS Union of India - Kerala.
-
Legal Principles:
-
The law regarding bail and the burden of proof remains well-established, with references to multiple Supreme Court judgments underscoring the importance of evidence, proof standards, and procedural correctness in criminal cases KIRAN CHANDRA DAS VS STATE OF ASSAM - Gauhati, Jibangshu Paul VS National Investigation Agency - Gauhati.
-
Additional References:
- A Division Bench decision from Andhra Pradesh (2001) and a Calcutta High Court case (1997) are mentioned, indicating case law relevant to the application of legal principles to specific facts S. Arumuganainar VS Jeenath Roadways - Madras.
Analysis and Conclusion: The references collectively suggest that the case involving Mr. Cri 2253 Sc pertains to procedural aspects of criminal proceedings, emphasizing the importance of evidence, proof standards, and proper judicial procedures. The repeated mention of case numbers, procedural orders, and legal principles indicates ongoing judicial scrutiny of the case's merits and procedural correctness. The references to Supreme Court judgments reinforce the critical role of evidence and burden of proof in criminal law, guiding the court's approach to the case.
Search Results for "All Mr Cri 2253 Sc"
2000 0 Supreme(Kar) 479 • India - Karnataka
H.N.NARAYAN
NO. 2253/2000 8/8/2000. ORDER ON BEING SPOKEN TO 1. The Petition was listed for Admission on 2nd August 2000.
1984 0 Supreme(Gau) 84 • India - Gauhati
K.N.SAIKIA
State of Assam, 1982 Cri LJ 2253 (Gauhati) where the petitioner, a boiler Khalashi, was found carrying 7½ Kg of "Assam raw coal" in two bags at 4.30 P.M. at a place 50 yards from the wall of the Loco Shed, but the coal was not examined by an expert and nobody testified that the same or similar coal was ... State of U.P. 1978 Cri LJ NOC 218 (All) the accused was caught while coming out of the railway workshop along with some workshop material. ... State of U.P., (1969) 2 SCC 786 : 1970 Cri LJ 1647 : (AIR 1970 SC 1868) was....
2012 0 Supreme(Ker) 886 • India - Kerala
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
Augusty, 2007 CRI. L. ... State of Kerala And Another, (AIR 2006 SC 3366 : 2006 AIR SCW 4652 : 2006 Cri LJ 4607). ... Sanjay Gandhi [AIR 1978 SC 961 : 1978 Cri LJ 952 was also referred to here, where it was held that proof of facts by preponderance of probabilities as in a civil case is not foreign to criminal jurisprudence. ... State Of Uttar Pradesh, [AIR 1966 SC 1762 : 1966 Cri LJ 1357 thus: "It is well-established that where the burden of an issue lies upon the accused, he is not required to discharge that burden by ....
• India - Crimes
H.N.NARAYAN
HNNJ: Cri. P. No. 2253 of 2000 8-8-2000 ORDER ON BEING SPOKEN TO The petition was listed for Admission on 22nd August, 2000.
2000 0 Supreme(AP) 571 • India - Andhra Pradesh
H.N.NARAYAN
... HNNJ: Cri. P. No. 2253 of 2000 ... 8-8-2000 ... ORDER ON BEING SPOKEN TO ... The petition was listed for Admission on 22nd August, 2000.
2005 0 Supreme(Mad) 1419 • India - Madras
P.K.MISRA, N.KANNADASAN
The Division Bench decision of Andhra Pradesh High Court reported in 2001 CRI.L.J. 2253 (SMT.G. KALAVATHI v. C. ANAND RAO AND OTHERS) is also equally inapplicable to the facts of the present case. ... It is therefore not necessary to consider the alternative submission made by the counsel for the appellant relying upon a Division Bench decision of the Calcutta High Court reported in 1997 CRI.L.J. 864 (HOOGHLY DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., v.
2014 0 Supreme(Ker) 674 • India - Kerala
ASHOK BHUSHAN, A.M.SHAFFIQUE, A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
High Court, Allahabad ((2011) 13 SCC 155)) : (AIR 2011 SC (Cri) 2253, Paras 7 & 8) had noted that with the immense power, lot of responsibilities are also on the shoulders of the press. ... The Supreme Court had taken suo motu notice regarding various instances, where large scale destruction of private and public properties in the name of agitation/bandh/hartal was done and an order was passed on 5-6-2007 (reported n Destruction of Public and Properties in Re (2007) 2 SCC (Cri) 351).
2011 0 Supreme(Gau) 626 • India - Gauhati
I.A.ANSARI, A.K.GOSWAMI
State of U.P. reported in 2006 Cri. ... Sudarshan Singh (2002) 3 SCC 598 : 2002 SCC (Cri) 688 and Puran v. Rambilas (2001) 6 SCC 338 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 1124. ... NCT, Delhi (2001)4 SCC 280 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 674 and Gurcharan Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.) (1978) 1 SCC 118 : 1978 SCC (Cri)41 : AIR 1978 SC 179. ... Rajesh Ranjan (2004) 7 SCC 528 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1977SCC pp. 535-36, para 11 ... 11. The law in regard to grant or refusal of bail is very well settled. ... LJ. 2253#HL_EN....
2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 659 • India - Bombay
A.H.JOSHI
2011 8 Supreme 486 • India - Supreme Court
ANIL R.DAVE, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Filter by Legal Phrase
