AI Overview

AI Overview...

References:
- Shree Pipes Limited VS Union of India - Rajasthan
- Collector Of Central Excise, Bangalore VS Mysore Paper Mills LTD. - Supreme Court
- Collector Of Central Excise, Delhi VS Kelvinator Of India LTD. - Supreme Court
- Collector Of Central Excise, Madras VS T. I. Millers LTD. , Madras And T. I. Diamond Chain, Madras - Supreme Court
- Iel Ltd. VS Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta - Supreme Court
- Sathe Biscuits & Chocolate Co. & others VS Union of India & others - Bombay
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai VS Parle International Ltd. - Supreme Court
- Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut VS Century Laminating Co. Ltd. - Supreme Court
- ALEMBIC GLASS INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA - Karnataka

Search Results for "Bombay Tyre Case"

Shree Pipes Limited VS Union of India

1992 0 Supreme(Raj) 909 India - Rajasthan

M.B.SHARMA

- BOMBAY TYRE CASE - CBEC INSTRUCTIONS UNDER SECTION 37-B OF THE ACT - FINAL DECISION SUBJECT TO REVIEW PETITION IN MRF CASE. ... The petitioner relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court in MRF case and Bombay Tyre case, which allowed such deductions. ... The court relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court in MRF case and Bombay Tyre case, which held that expenses incurred ....

Collector Of Central Excise, Bangalore VS Mysore Paper Mills LTD.

1997 0 Supreme(SC) 632 India - Supreme Court

SUHAS C.SEN, K.T.THOMAS

views of 66 this court in the Bombay Tyre International case – Question is not for what purpose a particular kind of packing is ... In this case the respondent manufactures writing paper – He also manufactures the wrapping paper, which ... , expressed – "in my opinion, the views expressed by the majority of the judges in Godfrey Philips case were in consonance with the ... (as His Lordship then was), expressed the view: ... "in my opinion, the views expressed by the majority of the judges in Godfrey Phi....

Collector Of Central Excise, Delhi VS Kelvinator Of India LTD.

1988 0 Supreme(SC) 305 India - Supreme Court

S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE

Bombay Tyre International Ltd. where it was held that after sale service charges could not be deducted from the assessable value. ... Tyre International case not be liable to be included since it would add to the value of the goods after the date of removal from ... Tyre International case have to be included but interest on finished goods from the date of delivery at the factory gate up to the ... Bombay Tyre International Ltd. where it was held tha....

Collector Of Central Excise, Madras VS T. I. Millers LTD. , Madras And T. I. Diamond Chain, Madras

1988 0 Supreme(SC) 239 India - Supreme Court

S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE

Held, held that the distributors were not related persons and in the light of the observations of this Court in Atic Industries case ... price to the distributor as assessable value – However, subsequently following the decision of the Madras High Court in a valuation case ... holding company or subsidiary company or relative of the manufacturer – From the explanation of the relationship furnished in this case ... Learned counsel for the revenue urged that it was a case of indirect relationship and came within the ratio ....

Iel Ltd.  VS Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta

1990 0 Supreme(SC) 849 India - Supreme Court

S.RANGANATHAN, J.S.VERMA, M.FATHIMA BEEVI

Fact of the Case: The dispute arose from the deduction of discounts and rebates in the computation of market value ... Collector for being reconsidered in the light of the Supreme Court judgments in the Bombay Tyre International case and the case of Asstt. Collector of Central Excise v. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. & Ors. - 1987 (27) E.L.T. 553.

Sathe Biscuits & Chocolate Co. & others VS Union of India & others

1984 0 Supreme(Bom) 65 India - Bombay

M.N.CHANDURKAR, R.A.JAHAGIRDAR

Fact of the Case: The petitioner company, a manufacturer of biscuits, chocolates, and cocoa, challenged a demand notice ... Sethna on paragraph 51 of the judgment in the Bombay Tyre International's case in the Bombay Tyre International's case, the Supreme Court has observed with regard to the facts of the case before them that it was apparent that the cost of primary packing, that is to say, the packing in which the article ... Bombay#HL_....

V. Rajaswari VS Bombay Tyre International LTD.

1994 0 Supreme(SC) 75 India - Supreme Court

M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.MOHAN

section which has been extracted above, are that landlady is a widow premises are required by her for her own residence - In this case ... ... In this case, both these requirements are satisfied. As regards the first, we do not want to state the obvious. ... (1) THIS is rather an unfortunate case. Though the appellant-landlady came forward with an application under Section 14(l)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 she could not succeed on that plea. The reason is; the courts have found that her entitlement is not activated by ....

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai VS Parle International Ltd.

2005 0 Supreme(SC) 1860 India - Supreme Court

RUMA PAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K.THAKKER

Fact of the Case: The issue revolved around the inclusion of advertisement expenses incurred by a marketing agency ... Bombay Tyre International Ltd. etc., 1984 (10) SCR 347 as well as Phillips India v. ... Bombay Tyre International case (supra) according to which it is only the advertisement and sales promotion expenses incurred for the goods under assessment that can be added to the assessable value. ... (supra), in our view, cannot be distinguished from the present case#....

Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut VS Century Laminating Co.  Ltd.

2006 0 Supreme(SC) 1483 India - Supreme Court

ASHOK BHAN, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA

Fact of the Case: The appeal was filed against the Tribunal's decision to set aside the order imposing central excise ... SCC 658] : 1988(36) ELT 723 (SC)], wherein this Court, relying upon the aforesaid decision in Bombay Tyre International case (supra), held: " ... ... Bombay Tyre International Ltd & Others 1983(4) S.C.C. 210, this Court held: "26. ... In the present case, the period involved is prior to the aforesaid amendment and, therefore, the said amendment w....

ALEMBIC GLASS INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA

1985 0 Supreme(Kar) 25 India - Karnataka

K.S.PUTTASWAMY, S.R.RAJASEKHARA MURTHY

Bombay Tyre International Ltd. and others and interpreted the definition of 'value' under Section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Act. ... Fact of the Case: M/s Alembic Glass Industries Ltd., Baroda, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 4(4) ... Section 4 (4) (d) (i) of the Act defines the term 'value' and its true scope is set at rest by the Supreme Court in Bombay Tyre International Ltd. 's case. ... Every one of the observations of the Supreme Court in Bombay #HL_....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top