AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Claims related to breach of assurance and non-disclosure in purchase and insurance contexts hinge on the obligation to declare material facts and fulfill contractual and policy conditions. The burden of proof primarily rests on the insurer or opposing party to establish breach or non-disclosure. Disputes involving quality, payment, or contractual non-compliance are often resolved by examining the presence of dishonest intent or material breach. Consumers and policyholders are protected under consumer laws, but must substantiate claims with evidence. Overall, transparency, proper declaration, and adherence to contractual obligations are key to avoiding liability and ensuring claims are honored.

Search Results for "Breach of Assurance and Non Discloser by Opposite for the Purchase of any Goods"

National Insurance Co. Ltd.  VS A. S. Moosani

India - Consumer

REKHA GUPTA

extract of Special Condition No.1 of the Policy in question, viz., “each and every consignment must be declared before dispatch of goods ... In General Assurance Society Ltd. ... In such a scenario the burden is on the insurance company to prove the breach in the policy in order to get exemption from liability. The book entries, the transit register and purchase register [Ex. ... New India Assurance Company Limited, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Harchand Rai Chandan Lal and Vikram Greentech India ....

Messers Nairn Tobaco Private Ltd.  VS Evergreen Drums Cans Private Ltd.

2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 644 India - Calcutta

ASIM KUMAR RAY

against the petitioner for cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal conspiracy. ... The petitioner stopped purchasing tin containers from the opposite party and the opposite party, in retaliation, filed a complaint ... Despite complaints, the opposite party failed to improve the quality. ... Non-payment or underpayment of the price of the goods by itself does not amount to commission of an offence of cheating or criminal breach of trust. ... The petitioner-com....

Bijay Agarwal @ Bijay Kumar Agarwal VS State of West Bengal

2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 921 India - Calcutta

RANJIT KUMAR BAG

Criminal Revision - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Cheating - Breach of Contract - Absence of Dishonest Intention - Inherent ... Whether the allegations in the written complaint disclosed a cognizable offense? 2. ... Finding of the Court: The court held that the allegations in the written complaint did not disclose any cognizable ... It is alleged in the said written complaint that the opposite party no.2 gave loan of Rs.25 lac to one Ganpat Agarwal and the present petitioners on assurance that th....

PALASH CHATTERJEE VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL

2007 0 Supreme(Cal) 442 India - Calcutta

PARTHA SAKHA DATTA

of trust by the complainant, who had purchased a medium goods vehicle from the bank under a hire purchase agreement. ... CRIMINAL - Quashing of FIR - Hire Purchase Agreement - Repossession of vehicle - No offence disclosed - Ingredients of Section ... Fact of the Case: Petitioner, the Manager of Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., was accused of cheating and criminal breach ... No. 2) purchased a medium goods vehicle of Eicher at the price of Rs. 5,05,000/- ....

GROUND WATER SURVEYS & DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MAHARASHTRA STATE vs M/S. UNIDATA AUSTRALIA PVT. LTD.

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 2946 India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

MR. SUBHASH CHANDRA, Presiding Member, AVM J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM (RETD.), Member

Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleges deficiency in service in the supply of ground water survey instruments by the Opposite ... The court found that the Opposite Parties failed to fulfill their contractual obligations, resulting in irreparable financial losses ... groundwater infrastructure, specifically alleged defective supply of Digital Water Level Recorders and Data Retrieval Systems by the Opposite ... of the purchase of the goods. ... guarantees; and committed willful ....

CG POWER & INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED vs MERCEDES-BENZ INDIA PRIVIATE LIMITED

2017 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 929 India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

V.K. JAIN, J

... ... Issues: Did the non-deployment of airbags constitute a deficiency in service or a breach of consumer protection laws? ... ... ... Result: Complaint partly allowed: Opposite parties ordered to compensate the complainants for service deficiencies. ... resulting in grievous injuries - Complainants sought replacement of the vehicle and compensation for loss of business and injuries - Opposite ... made available to the car owners at the time of purchase in November, 2002, when the vehicle in quest....

Electrosteel Steel Ltd.  VS STP Ltd.

2019 0 Supreme(Cal) 741 India - Calcutta

MADHUMATI MITRA

, and the application of legal provisions of cheating and criminal breach of trust. ... representations and failed to make payment, leading to allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust. ... Cheating - Criminal Breach of Trust - Indian Penal Code - Sections 420/406/417/411/418 read with Section 120B and 34 - The court ... The Accused Company agreed to purchase Bitumen Tape from the opposite party company on the terms and conditions which were mentioned in the purchase order. ....

Commercial Automobiles VS Shri Maharaj Singh Bhatia

2011 0 Supreme(MP) 1247 India - Madhya Pradesh

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA

, a Transport Operator, filed a suit against the defendants for the purchase of vehicles. ... suitability of the vehicles for use as 'Tippers' and whether the plaintiff was aware of the unsuitability of the vehicles before purchase ... Implied Warranty - Sale of Goods - Section 16 of the Sales of Goods Act, 1930 - Summary Fact of the Case: The plaintiff ... According to learned counsel for plaintiff-respondent because it was never disclosed by first and second defendants (appellants herein) that on Mod....

Pawan Hans Limited VS New India Assurance Company Limited

India - Consumer

AVM J. RAJENDRA

The Complainant/Appellant, “Pawan Hans Ltd.” is a Mini-Ratna Govt. of India Enterprises, provides helicopter services to both Govt. and Private sector companies to cover areas such as oil rigs, mines, jungles etc and the “New India Assurance Company Ltd. is the Opposite Party/Respondent or the insurer ... Indu Kumar Kanwar, there was no breach observed and the claim was settled. For the balance, she filed a case before the District Forum, which was dismissed vide order dated 16.04.2015, due to non-maintainability of the ....

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs A.S. MOOSANI & CO.

2017 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 309 India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Mrs. Rekha Gupta, PM

The burden lies on the insurer to prove claims regarding non-disclosure of material facts under the policy conditions. ... An incident occurred resulting in loss of cargo, which was disputed by the insurance company due to alleged non-disclosure of previous ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: Disclosure of each shipment is mandatory under the policy conditions, and non-compliance nullifies the claim ... In General Assurance Society Ltd. ... In such a scenario the burden is on the insurance company to prove the breac....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top