AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The Business Running in the Style of Quasi Partnership refers to informal or semi-formal business arrangements where courts recognize a partnership-like relationship based on conduct, asset use, family involvement, or branding, even without formal registration. This recognition impacts legal proceedings related to dissolution, disputes, and injunctions, emphasizing the importance of the nature of the relationship over formal documentation. Courts tend to protect the interests of parties involved in such arrangements, especially in closely held or family businesses, applying the quasi partnership doctrine to ensure fairness and justice.

Search Results for "Business Running in the Style of Quasi Partnership"

GANESH CHANDRA MUKHERJI VS GOPAL CHANDRA HAZRA

1976 0 Supreme(Cal) 295 India - Calcutta

N.C.MUKHERJI, B.C.RAY

business was being carried on with the assets of the previous partnership. 3. ... The court further held that the partnership business was being carried on with the assets of the previous partnership and that the ... of the business. ... Furthermore, the appointment of a receiver over a running partnership business will tend to hamper the smooth running of the said business and thus ultimately may....

R.  Ramesh VS Devi Polymers Private Limited

2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 763 India - Madras

RAJIV SHAKDHER

The Court also held that the principle of quasi partnership applied to the case, as the company was a closely held family business ... The Court held that the principle of quasi partnership applied to the case, as the company was a closely held family business. 3. ... The Court also held that the principle of quasi partnership applied to the case, as the company was a closely held family business ... ... (ii) The said par....

K.  Vasudeva Rao VS K.  Lakshminarayana Rao

2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 4381 India - Madras

K.CHANDRU

The judgment addressed the legal principles of quasi partnership, company dissolution, and the application of the Companies Act in ... Injunction - Business Dispute - Companies Act - [O.A.Nos.143 and 144 of 2011, A.No.3413 of 2011, A.No.3460 of 2011, A.No.3876 ... of 2011] - The court discussed the applicants' claim for an injunction to prevent interference in the business and affairs of a company ... At all times, the business was managed as a family affair both during and after the life time of late K....

Laxmikant V. Patel VS Chetanbhat Shah

2001 8 Supreme 558 India - Supreme Court

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, R.C.LAHOTI

business of colour lab and studio in 1982 in Ahmedabad in a trade name of which Muktajivan is a part-Defendant running his colour ... lab under the name and style of "Gokul Studio" intending to commence business through his wife adopting the name and style of Muktajivan ... by adopting word Muktajivan as a part of his business name although till then his business was being run in the name and style ... At the latter place the business#HL....

RAVI ARYA & ORS  VS ARYA IRON AND STEEL CO. PVT. LTD.

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2772 India - National Company Law Tribunal

N/A, J

AIRONLINE 2021 SC 179 , wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court considered whether Tata Sons is a Quasi Partnership so as to invoke equitable principle of dissolution of a partnership. ... 7.12.5 It is also submitted that in or around March 2018, when the Respondent No. 8, a Nominee Director had taken objection to the running of a competitive business, it was the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 who had clarified that since there was no non-compete clause in the SHA and AoA, ... In the first type of these cases, wher....

A. K.  KALLAPPA CHETTIAR VS STATE OF KERALA

India - Kerala

M.U.ISAAK

, a partnership-firm, closed down its industries due to disputes with the workers. ... The closure of a business involves relinquishing the business itself, while a lockout indicates the closure of the place of business ... Industrial Dispute - Closure of Business - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Section 10(3)) Fact of the Case: The petitioner ... —The petitioner is a partnership-firm, herein represented by its managing partner. It started an industry in 1959 under the style....

K.  Arumugaswamy VS The District Revenue Officer, Kamarajar District at Virudhunagar

1986 0 Supreme(Mad) 373 India - Madras

SATHIADEV, MAHESWARAN

of the General Clauses Act could be invoked only in respect of subordinate legislation, and not in respect of administrative or quasi-judicial ... in Section 21 of General Clauses Act could be referable only to subordinate legislation, and not in respect of administrative or quasi-judicial ... Govind Swaminathan, learned counsel for the second respondent, submits that the licence having been treated as part of the partnership business, the appellant cannot any longer claim that it stood only in his name. ... He submits t....

KALA NIKETAN VS KALA NIKETAN

1981 0 Supreme(Del) 268 India - Delhi

G.C.JAIN

The court also held that the defendant's use of the address "South Extension" was insufficient to distinguish its business from the ... operating under the trade name "Kala Niketan" since 1957, sought to restrain the defendant from using the same name for its saree business ... In April 1958, she took her two sons, Shambhoo Nath Khanna and Krishan Lal Khanna, in partnership with her in the said business. Shambhoo Nath Khanna retired from the firm with effect from June 15, 1966. ... Shrimati Momi Devi also retired with ef....

CHHAGANLAL LAVJIBHAI KALARIA VS CHAIRMAN and MANAGING DIRECTOR BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION

1991 0 Supreme(Guj) 336 India - Gujarat

A.N.DIVECHA

It is possible that the dealership business at the petrol pump might come to be assigned under the guise of partnership to a person ... the covenants and stipulations on their part contained in the Agreement pursuant to the Agreement the present appellant started running ... nor to admit new members as partners nor to allow any partner to withdraw from the partnership without obtaining the previous consent ... Pursuant to the Agreement the present appellant started running the petrol pump in the name an....

WITCO (India) Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Director V. P. Nurdeen Chennai VS NITCO rep. by its Partners Zakir Hussain & Anis Fathima Chennai & Others

2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 5125 India - Madras

PRABHA SRIDEVAN, K.K.SASIDHARAN

They are doing business since long. The very partnership in the name and style of "NITCO" was constituted only on 22. 2009 and the business commenced only thereafter. The document produced by the appellant shows their volume of business. ... ... (d) Subsequently the second and third respondents formed a partnership in the name and style of "NITCO" in pursuance of a partnership deed dated 22. 2009 with an idea of providing services to the customers f....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top