Compulsion to Testify: Under Indian law, witnesses can generally be compelled to give evidence, but certain protections exist for accused persons and informants. For instance, Section 132 of the Evidence Act provides that a person cannot be compelled to testify against himself, safeguarding against self-incrimination DWIJADAS BANERJEE VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Calcutta, Damodar V. Pangrekar VS Ramachandravaswani - Madras, Kamal Kumar Nanda VS State of Orissa (Vig. ) - Crimes.
Accused as Witness: An accused person has the right to be a witness on his own request, but cannot be compelled to testify against himself. Section 315 of CrPC allows the accused to examine himself as a witness if he chooses, but the law emphasizes that he should do so voluntarily Afzal Pasha VS Mohamed Ameerjan - Karnataka, Rakeshbhai Maganbhai Barot VS State of Gujarat - Crimes.
Protection Against Self-Incrimination: Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India and Section 132 of the Evidence Act prohibit compelling an individual, including the accused, to give self-incriminating evidence. Courts have held that no person can be forced to testify against himself DWIJADAS BANERJEE VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Calcutta, Damodar V. Pangrekar VS Ramachandravaswani - Madras.
Witnesses in Complaint Cases: A person summoned as a witness in a complaint case can be compelled to give evidence unless protected by specific provisions like Section 132. The courts have clarified that the right against self-incrimination applies equally in complaint cases, and witnesses cannot be forced to testify if it infringes this right SUBEDAR VS STATE - Allahabad, Damodar V. Pangrekar VS Ramachandravaswani - Madras.
Special Protections: Certain witnesses, such as informants or those protected under privilege clauses, may have additional safeguards. For example, informants' identities are protected, and they are not compelled to disclose certain information Hasmukh Balubhai Shah VS State of Maharashtra & others - Bombay.
Legal Precedents: Courts have consistently maintained that while witnesses can be compelled to testify, the accused's right not to self-incriminate remains paramount. The courts have also recognized that evidence must be voluntary and not obtained under coercion DWIJADAS BANERJEE VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Calcutta, People Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar - Punjab and Haryana.
In India, under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and Evidence Act, witnesses can generally be compelled to give evidence in complaint cases. However, the fundamental right against self-incrimination, enshrined in Article 20(3) of the Constitution and Section 132 of the Evidence Act, provides that no person, including accused persons and certain witnesses, can be forced to testify against themselves. Courts balance the need for effective investigation and trial with these protections, ensuring that any compelled testimony is voluntary and not obtained through coercion.
References: - Section 132 of the Evidence Act - Section 315 of CrPC - Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution - Judicial rulings: Ram Babu Misra (AIR 1980 SC 791), and others cited above
to be a witness; and (c) he was being compelled to give evidence against himself. 2. ... Fact of the Case: Subedar, named as an accused in a complaint, was summoned as a witness in a preliminary enquiry under ... Final Decision: The court allowed the revision petition and set aside the Magistrate's order directing Subedar to give evidence ... compelled to give evidence against....
Ram Babu Misra, AIR 1980 SC 791, which held that the language of Section 73 of the Evidence Act does not permit a Court to give a ... 1978 SC 1025, which held that during the stage of investigation, the accused has a right to keep silence and an accused cannot be compelled ... VOICE RECORDING - COMPARISON - EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 - SECTION 73 - IDENTIFICATION OF PRISONERS ACT, 1920 - SECTIONS 3, 4, 5 - CONSTITUTION ... Lend itself to the inference that the accused was compelled to make the statement, though....
Whether the petitioner was compelled to answer the questions in court and was protected under Section 132 of the Evidence Act. 3. ... The petitioner's contention that he was compelled to answer the questions in court and was protected under Section 132 of the Evidence ... The respondent filed a complaint against the petitioner under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code for defamation. ... The proviso mitigates the rigour of the general rule contained in section 132 and-protects him from any prosecution....
CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 302, INDIAN PENAL CODE - MURDER - CONVICTION - EVIDENCE - SOLE WITNESS - RELIABILITY - CORROBORATION ... The court also found that Bholar was a truthful witness, as he had admitted to certain facts that were不利于prosecution's case. 3. ... the medical evidence and the circumstantial evidence. ... The matter thus must depend upon the circumstances of each case and the quality of the evidence of the single witness#HL_EN....
some others-Held, petitioner to be summoned as witness. ... Constitution of India-Article 20(3)-Court took cognizance only against one person though complaint was filed against petitioner and ... This principle now embodied in the Criminal Evidence Act, 1898 in England, stipulates that though the accused is competent to be a witness on his own behalf, he cannot be compelled to give evidence against himself. ... Protection is sought under Article 20 (3) of the Constitu....
—Illegal gratification—Framing of charge—When no complaint as described under Section 2(d) of Cr.P.C. has been made by public servant ... Cr.P.C. rather it refers to a person who enters witness box and is sworn as a witness. ... (Para 5) ... (B) Indian Evidence Act, 1872—Section 132—Exemption to witness—When ... such witness for giving false evidence. ... The safeguard to this compulsion is that no such answer which the wi....
(a) he shall not be called as a witness except on his own request in writing; ... (b) his failure to give evidence shall not be made the subject of any comment by any of the parties or the Court or give rise to any presumption against himself or any person charged ... For it would run against a first principle in criminal law namely, that an accused shall not be called as a witness except on his own request in writing. The evidence on behalf of the accused would include that of the acc....
Section 125, which protects public officers from being compelled to give evidence about the commission of an offence, did not apply ... PRIVILEGE - WITNESS - PROSECUTION WITNESS - INFORMANT - EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 - SECTIONS 123, 124, 125, 115 - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ... He contended that he was an informant and his identity should not have been disclosed, and that he could not be compelled to give ... compelled to give#....
Finding of the Court: The Court held that the applicant is not being compelled to be a witness against himself and ... The applicant is not being compelled to be a witness against himself in the proceedings under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 1913 ... ARTICLE 20(3) - COMPANIES ACT, 1913, SECTION 185 - INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872, SECTION 132 - CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ARTICLE 20( ... Proviso to Sec.132 adequately protects him, against such answers which the witness may be c....
The evidence on behalf of the accused would include that of the accused, subject to Section 315 Cr.P.C. ... ., the Legislature in its wisdom has left it open to the accused to exercise the option of examining himself as a witness for an ... For it would run against a first principle in criminal law namely, that an accused shall not be called as a witness except on his ... The complainant is normally the driving force behind the complaint, and the most important witness in any, such #HL....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.