Sanjay Chotelal Yadav - Named among individuals involved in cases reported in (2004) 7 SCC 242, where the Supreme Court discussed matters under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, indicating his involvement in legal proceedings related to the State of Jharkhand Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South East Central Railway VS General Secretary - Bombay.
State of Jharkhand - Several cases have been filed in the Jharkhand High Court, often involving the Secretary-cum-Commissioner of the Irrigation Department and other officials, with multiple proceedings recorded from 2016 to 2019, particularly concerning districts like Garhwa SHARAT KUMAR MAJEE And ORS vs STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS - Jharkhand, 010001012003, 010391482018, 010179942019, 010252072016, 010207832019, 010266162019, 010246592019, 010279542019.
Legal Context - The Supreme Court in 2004 emphasized the importance of proper legal procedures under Articles 226 & 227, indicating that cases involving the State of Jharkhand often relate to administrative or constitutional challenges, with judicial oversight ensuring adherence to legal principles Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South East Central Railway VS General Secretary - Bombay.
Analysis and Conclusion: Sanjay Chotelal Yadav is a notable individual involved in legal proceedings linked to the State of Jharkhand, particularly in cases concerning administrative or constitutional matters. The Jharkhand High Court has addressed multiple cases over recent years involving state officials, reflecting ongoing legal disputes or administrative issues within the state. The Supreme Court's earlier remarks highlight the significance of constitutional provisions in adjudicating such cases, ensuring that state actions comply with constitutional and legal standards.
, (xi) Radheshyam Godhad, (xii) Fulchand Rahangdale, (xiii) Madan Khairba, (xiv)Keshao Meshram, (xv) Sanjay Chotelal Yadav, (xvi) Anil Kotangale, (xvii) Ajay Chotelal Yadav, (xviii) Satish Sahare, (xix) Rajesh Meshram, (xx) Dipak Lanjewar, (xxi) Nathu Mashdeo Borkar, (xxii) Prakash Mele, (xxiii) Shyamlal ... State of Jharkhand and others reported in (2004) 7 SCC 242, however, while deciding matter relating to Art. 226 & 227, Supreme Court has had to say as under in para 18, 20: ... ....
The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary- cum-Commissioner, Irrigation Dept. ... of Karnataka & others Vrs. ... of Karnataka & others Vrs. ... of Karnataka & others Vrs. ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary- cum-Commissioner, Irrigation Dept. ... of Karnataka & others Vrs. ... of Karnataka & others Vrs. ... of Karnataka & others Vrs. ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... Garhwa Jharkhand.
of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... Garhwa Jharkhand.
of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... Garhwa Jharkhand.
of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... Garhwa Jharkhand.
of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... Garhwa Jharkhand.
of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... Garhwa Jharkhand.
of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... of Jharkhand. ... Garhwa Jharkhand.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.