AI Overview...
-
Co-Owner Cannot Construct on Shared Property - A co-owner cannot construct or make modifications on a common wall or joint property without the consent of the other co-owners. They must construct on the entire width of the common wall and allow shared use, with their rights limited to access and penetration rights, not exclusive construction. Ganesh VS Ramchandra - Madhya Pradesh, N. S. BANGERA, RAMA BANGERA VS STATE - Karnataka, Ramkrishna Bapu Kotkar VS Namdeo alias Narayan Nagesh Kotkar - Bombay
-
Construction Requires Consent of Co-Owners - Courts have consistently held that co-owners need mutual consent before undertaking construction on joint property. Unauthorized construction can lead to injunctions or orders to cease work. Jacobs (P) Ltd. VS Thomas Jacob - Kerala, N. S. BANGERA, RAMA BANGERA VS STATE - Karnataka, Ramkrishna Bapu Kotkar VS Namdeo alias Narayan Nagesh Kotkar - Bombay
-
Restrictions on Construction Without Permits - Property owners cannot construct access roads or buildings affecting public infrastructure without necessary permits and permissions from relevant authorities. Ownership alone does not grant unconditional rights to build; proper permissions are mandatory. THANKAMANIYAMMA vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala, State Of Gujarat VS Parshottamdas Ramdas Patel - Supreme Court
-
Building on Another’s Property is Not Permissible - Permission to construct cannot be granted on premises owned by another individual without explicit approval. Constructing or claiming ownership without proper title or consent is unlawful and subject to legal restrictions. Erraballi Sriranga Rao VS Erraballi Sampath Rao - Andhra Pradesh, MEHABOOB M. S. VS TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CHENNAPATNA - Karnataka
-
Municipal and Public Authority Limitations - Municipal bodies cannot compel property owners to construct or maintain works (e.g., water supply) or deny them the right to construct buildings on their property without following due legal procedures, including land acquisition laws when applicable. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai VS Satyaprakash Laxmisingh & others - Bombay, MEHABOOB M. S. VS TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CHENNAPATNA - Karnataka
Analysis and Conclusion:
Construction on shared or joint properties is strictly regulated; co-owners must obtain mutual consent, and construction on another’s property is prohibited without explicit permission. Authorities require proper permits for infrastructure or building projects affecting public or private land. Unauthorized construction can lead to legal injunctions, and rights are limited by ownership, consent, and statutory procedures.
Search Results for "Co Owner Cannot Construct"
1979 0 Supreme(MP) 31 • India - Madhya Pradesh
J.P.Bajpai
Common wall - the entire wall should retain its character of common wall - one owner cannot construct on half of its width - he has ... [Para 3 ... One co-owner cannot construct on half width of the wall, ... he has to construct on whole of it and should allow the other co-owner to make use of it. ... The only right which will be available to him will be as a co owner in respect of the common wall i.e. the right to penetrate iron ba....
1994 0 Supreme(Ker) 283 • India - Kerala
K.T.THOMAS, B.N.PATNAIK
The court also held that a co-owner cannot construct on the property without the consent of other co-owners. ... cannot construct on the property without the consent of other co-owners. ... Construction - Injunction - Transfer of Property Act - S.53-A Fact of the Case: A co-owner filed a suit for partition ... The co-owners put the first defendant-company in possession of the land and permitted the company to construct buildings thereon subject to the condition that ....
2001 0 Supreme(Del) 901 • India - Delhi
SHARDA AGGARWAL
cannot construct anything on the roof without permission of tenant or till his lawful eviction — Injunction granted. ... nbsp;It is established that terrace formed part of tenancy and as such defendants, who claimed to have acquired ownership rights, cannot ... injunction — Tenant occupies single storeyed building — Terrace formed part of tenancy — No written agreement to prove contrary — owner ... A finding in a particular case cannot be used as a precedent in another case without reference to its fact....
2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 45866 • India - High Court of Kerala
K VINOD CHANDRAN, J
Ratio Decidendi: A property owner cannot construct access roads affecting public infrastructure without necessary permits, ... Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to construct an access road without prior permission and the relevant impact on ... The fact that the adjacent property is owned by the petitioner's family members shall not stand against the petitioner, since the petitioner categorically states that the petitioner cannot seek for an access to the road through the property of others, ....
1987 0 Supreme(Kar) 338 • India - Karnataka
D.P.HIREMATH
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a co-owner cannot construct on joint property without consent, and the grant of mandatory ... AIR 1980 Kerala 94, AIR 1969 Goa-90] - The court discussed the principles of joint family property and the rights of co-owners to construct ... ... ( 7 ) EVEN a co-owner cannot appropriate a portion of the joint family for himself and construct a building thereon for his own use and occupation at his own cost without their permission. ......
2005 0 Supreme(Bom) 1342 • India - Bombay
N.A.BRITTO
cannot construct said hut without consent of other co-owners - Cannot change user of property of his own without consent of other ... could not construct the said hut without the consent of other co-owners including the plaintiff. ... could not construct the said hut without the consent of other co-owners including the plaintiff. ... The defendant has not set up any other plea and therefore the learned trial Court as well as the First Appellant court were fully justified in coming to the conclusion that....
1987 0 Supreme(SC) 854 • India - Supreme Court
E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, K.N.SINGH
COMPEL THE GOVERNMENT TO ACQUIRE PARTICULAR LANDS UNDER THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT - Where owners were entitled to construct ... (q) of S. 2 of the Act does not provide that a land on which the owner cannot construct a building will cease to be vacant land for purposes of the Act. ... Merely because S. 29(1)(a), Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 requires a person owning the land to which a scheme applied to obtain permission of the local authority to construct a building on it, it cannot be....
1989 0 Supreme(AP) 434 • India - Andhra Pradesh
A.RAMANUJULU NAIDU, NEELADRI RAO
One cannot be given a permission to construct a house or a building on a premises admittedly belonging to another. ... ... The defendant in a suit cannot claim title in regard to any property ... in the name of another on the plea that he is the real owner. ... One cannot be given a permission to construct a house or a building on a premises admittedly belonging to another. The house constructed has to be assessed for property tax. ... So they cannot be treated as jo....
2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 171 • India - Bombay
D.G.KARNIK
It cannot compel any citizen or owner of a property to construct or erect any works for the supply of water to other citizens in ... Instead of performing its own duty to construct and maintain water works, the appellant cannot direct a citizen to erect and maintain ... to inconvenience caused to general public - Held - Once municipal corporation had considered the borewells as unauthorised they cannot ... It cannot compel any citizen or owner of a p....
1988 0 Supreme(Kar) 268 • India - Karnataka
M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
Ratio Decidendi: The Municipal Council cannot deny the right of the owner to construct a building on the site without initiating ... Acquisition - Municipal Council - Right to Construct Building Fact of the Case: The petitioner applied for a building ... If that is so, merely because the Town Municipal council has chosen to locate a School building on the site in question without initiating proceedings under the Land acquisition Act, it cannot deny the right of the owner to put up a ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
