AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively highlight the complexities of registering, operating, and regulating businesses, especially in sectors like manufacturing, agriculture, and rural industries. Key issues include procedural compliance in land and business registration, environmental and distance norms for factories, adherence to licensing laws, and infrastructural challenges. Effective regulation requires strict procedural adherence and transparent enforcement to ensure lawful business operations and environmental protection.

Search Results for "Complaint Registered Business Location Purchase from Production Plant Authority"

Shree Renuka Sugars VS Union Of India Ministry Of Consumer Affairs Food & Public Distribution Department Of Food & Public Distribution

2011 0 Supreme(Kar) 222 India - Karnataka

N.KUMAR, RAVI MALIMATH

In fact, the aforesaid three sale deeds were registered even without such permission on the ground, for purchase of the said lands ... But mere obtaining permission to purchase agricultural land does not amount to purchase of agricultural land in the name of the factory ... incorrect and it cannot be said, in the light of the aforesaid material that the Shivashakti Sugars Ltd., had taken effective steps for purchase ... shall not carry on business or trade so as to affect his trade or ....

Sahyadri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. vs Union of India

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4019 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

G.S.KULKARNI, ADVAIT M.SETHNA

were established - Respondent constructed plant and operated it despite contesting claims regarding production capability. ... Petition filed challenging IEM granted to a sugar factory for setting up within the prohibited radius but existing compliance and production ... was de-recognized; petitioner alleged non-compliance with amended distance requirements post IEM transfer; contest around prior production ... now purchased by Shivneri, is within the distance of 25 kms from the existing locat....

Bharat Biotech International Limited, hyderabad VS A. P. Health and Medical Housing and Infrastructure development Corporation, Hyderabad

2002 0 Supreme(AP) 1398 India - Andhra Pradesh

J.CHELAMESWAR

of manufacture and sale of vaccines and drugs - Company s registered office is at Hyderabad and its manufacturing unit is at Turkapally ... petitioner is a Company and the second petitioner is shareholder of first petitioner-Company - First petitioner-company is engaged in business ... Hepatitis Vaccine - It is stated in affidavit filed in support writ petition that first petitioner - Company commenced its commercial production ... The first petitioner-company is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of vaccine....

Jodhpur Industries VS New India Assurance Co.  Ltd.

India - Consumer

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, INDER JIT SINGH

Result: Complaint dismissed. ... Claim – Exaggeration of claim – proved - the claim in respect of machinery was exaggerated inasmuch as the Insured had claimed purchase ... ascertaining the quantum so the loss is considered on the basis of physical estimated inventory enlisted on dated 3.9.2016 – On facts, the complaint ... firm M/S Aditya Trading was reported closed its business on dated 31.3.2016, this shows that the purchases invoices of the plant and Machineries was merely arrang....

State Of Bihar VS Oswal Chemicals And Fertilizers Limited

2001 0 Supreme(Pat) 297 India - Patna

D.P.S.CHOUDHARY, NAGENDRA RAI

Constitution of India-Article 19(1)(9)Fundamental right of trade and business is not absolute and the law permits a social control ... view to achieve the object of the Control Order, the same having not been issued by the State Government but by the Registering Authority ... Control) Order, 1985-Clause 31-A licence cannot be cancelled on the ground of non-compliance of directions given by Registering Authority ... The certificate of registration is granted in Form B, in which a description of the place and type of business#HL_E....

Hatsun Agro Product Ltd.  VS State of Tamil Nadu

India - Crimes

P.JYOTHIMANI

(ii) Essential Commodities Act, 1955—Section 3.6—Power to control production ... premises of the petitioner—Validity—Procedure contemplated under Section 11 of the Act in taking sample not followed by the authority—No ... on the complaint of alleged adulteration effected by the petitioner. ... In the Order, the following definitions are relevant: “2(c) “business in milk and milk product” means sale or purchase of milk or milk product and includes manufacturing, processing, handling or controlling of mi....

Lalit Soni S/o Radha Krishna Verma VS State of Rajasthan

2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 2291 India - Rajasthan

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

the clinching effect of the stand so taken by the NTPC in the present case is that the impugned FIR itself, which allegedly was registered ... the clinching effect of the stand so taken by the NTPC in the present case is that the impugned FIR itself, which allegedly was registered ... the clinching effect of the stand so taken by the NTPC in the present case is that the impugned FIR itself, which allegedly was registered ... to the extent of generator and to the extent of details of the solar inverter, location etc. ... ....

Vedanta Limited, Unit: Sterlite Copper, Rep. , by its General Manager-Legal, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Tamil Nadu VS State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.  by the Principal Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Chennai

2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 730 India - Madras

T.S.SIVAGNANAM, V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

and captive power plant are situated within copper smelter complex of petitioners unit – Held, learned Senior Advocate submitted ... of Tamil Nadu and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board together with Inspection and Scrutiny Reports pertaining to petitioners plant ... Chief Environmental Engineer, Monitoring, Tirunelveli and to furnish the same to petitioner forthwith and record of proceedings - Plant ... In the said decision, the complaint was against a small part of the business carried on by the a....

Mountain Spinning Mills Ltd. , rep.  by its Authorized Officer, Tuticorin VS Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd. , Chennai

2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 244 India - Madras

C.S.KARNAN

a spinning mill company, sought a separate dedicated feeder line due to frequent power interruptions and low voltage affecting production ... Further, as on date, there is no complaint received from the petitioner towards the varying of voltage of dangerous levels. ... As per the records, the registered consumer is one Mr.G.Vetrivel, but in the instant case was filed by third party, viz., Mr.S.Rajkumar. ... Further, the proposal was prepared and sent to the Competent Authority and a combined site inspection was carried o....

M/S MAHAKOUSHAL SUGAR AND POWER INDUSTRIES VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2025 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 2092 India - National Green Tribunal BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)

Sheo Kumar Singh, Dr. A. Senthil Vel, JJ

The conventional plant and process being less profitable, makes the business operations difficult and thus many units in the rural areas have been closing. ... Location of jiggery units is also change according to their own suitability. 2. All the jiggery unit (without boiler) comes under micro scale (tiny unit) which are the self registered in MSME portal according to their suitability. 3. ... " means an officer appointed to be a licensing authority by the State Government for the purpose of this order....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top