AI Overview

AI Overview...

References: - RUPENDRA KASHYAP VS JIWAN PUBLISHING HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED - Delhi, Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. VS Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. - Delhi, Dish TV India Ltd. VS Gulf DTH FZ LLC - Delhi, GULF DTH FZ LLC VS DISHTV INDIA LIMITED - Delhi, GULF DTH FZ LLC VS DISHTV INDIA LIMITED - Delhi, Giant Rocket Media And Entertainment Pvt Ltd VS Priyanka Ghatak - Delhi, World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. VS Savio Fernandes - Delhi, SANJAY KUAMR GUPTA VS SONY PICTURES NETWORKS INDIA P. LTD. - Delhi, WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC. vs SAVIO FERNANDES & ORS - Delhi, WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC. vs SAVIO FERNANDES & ORS - Delhi

Search Results for "Copyrightable Content"

World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.  VS Savio Fernandes

2015 0 Supreme(Del) 4645 India - Delhi

MANMOHAN SINGH

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the defendants' unauthorized use of the plaintiff's trademarks and copyrightable content ... The defendants were found to be selling counterfeit goods bearing the plaintiff's trademarks and copyrightable content without authorization ... Defendants were advertising the said products bearing the trademarks, logos and other copyrightable content of the plaintiff on the said websites. The website had also displayed a collage of various photographs bea....

Dish TV India Ltd.  VS Gulf DTH FZ LLC

2016 0 Supreme(Del) 3884 India - Delhi

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, PRATIBHA RANI

Whether mere insertion of different advertisement in the content results in two copyrightable contents would then become a matter of debate. In the absence of a written statement as of now, the appellant cannot even open up the debate. ... The ownership in the content of what is ultimately broadcasted is with the content provider and the content provider has the right to restrict the territory in which the broadcaster can broadcast the content under the license. ... M....

GULF DTH FZ LLC VS DISHTV INDIA LIMITED

2017 0 Supreme(Del) 4722 India - Delhi

S.P.GARG

Whether mere insertion of different advertisement in the content results in two copyrightable contents would then become a matter of debate. In the absence of a written statement as of now, the appellant cannot even open up the debate. ... 26. ... The cue to the possible defence was that the content holder provides signals of the broadcast to the respondent No.1 with advertisements, breaks etc. for the OSN Territories and the same content holder provides signal of the broadcast to the appellant with adv....

GULF DTH FZ LLC VS DISHTV INDIA LIMITED

2017 0 Supreme(Del) 4736 India - Delhi

S.P.GARG

Whether mere insertion of different advertisement in the content results in two copyrightable contents would then become a matter of debate. In the absence of a written statement as of now, the appellant cannot even open up the debate. ... 26. ... The cue to the possible defence was that the content holder provides signals of the broadcast to the respondent No.1 with advertisements, breaks etc. for the OSN Territories and the same content holder provides signal of the broadcast to the appellant with adv....

RUPENDRA KASHYAP VS JIWAN PUBLISHING HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED

1993 0 Supreme(Del) 725 India - Delhi

MAHINDER NARAIN

Whether the question papers are copyrightable subject matter. 2. ... Question papers are copyrightable subject matter as they are a compilation of questions requiring answers from examinees, akin to ... The court held that question papers are copyrightable subject matter as they are a compilation of questions requiring answers from ... ; photographs are copyrightable too. ... ... ( 26 ) THE form and content of the question paper which is on record of this Court, is something which is registerable unde....

WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC. vs SAVIO FERNANDES & ORS

India - Delhi High Court

There were approximately 1300 merchandise articles bearing the WWE logo, trademarks and other copyrightable content available at the said store. ... Defendants were advertising the said products bearing the trademarks, logos and other copyrightable content of the plaintiff on the said websites. ... The defendant No.1 is the proprietor of the defendant No. 2 and 3, who are engaged in selling apparel and merchandise bearing the registered trademark WWEand other copyrightable cont....

WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC. vs SAVIO FERNANDES & ORS

India - Delhi High Court

There were approximately 1300 merchandise articles bearing the WWE logo, trademarks and other copyrightable content available at the said store. ... Defendants were advertising the said products bearing the trademarks, logos and other copyrightable content of the plaintiff on the said websites. ... The defendant No.1 is the proprietor of the defendant No. 2 and 3, who are engaged in selling apparel and merchandise bearing the registered trademark WWEand other copyrightable cont....

Giant Rocket Media And Entertainment Pvt Ltd VS Priyanka Ghatak

2020 0 Supreme(Del) 1230 India - Delhi

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

It noted that the book's content may not qualify as an original literary work and that the plaintiff did not plead any similarity ... It was held that while under the "sweat of the brow" doctrine copyright was conferred on works merely because time energy skill and labour was expended, now under the "modicum of creativity" standard not every effort or industry or expending of skill results in copyrightable work but only those which ... Techno Plast, (2016) 233 DLT 1 held that the content of what is "original" has undergone considerable ch....

Godfrey Phillips India Ltd.  VS Dharampal Satyapal Ltd.

2012 0 Supreme(Del) 1635 India - Delhi

A.K.PATHAK

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the slogans were not copyrightable as they were common phrases, and the advertisements ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the slogans 'Shauq Badi Cheez Hai' and 'Swad Badi Cheez Hai' were not copyrightable ... There is nothing original in this slogan which is not copyrightable. ... That apart, the slogans, in my view, are not copyrightable. Plaintiff can at best press for a passing off action by making out a case in its favor. ... 3. 16. ... The next question whi....

SANJAY KUAMR GUPTA VS SONY PICTURES NETWORKS INDIA P.  LTD.

2018 0 Supreme(Del) 2754 India - Delhi

VALMIKI J.MEHTA

rights or broadcasting rights (Chapter VIII Sections 37 to 39A) and only which are then copyrightable issues as per the Copyright Act, 1957. ... The Plaintiffs were asked to sign a consent letter. A consent letter in the television industry allegedly releases the media houses from any liability in case they broadcast content that is similar to the concept note that is being presented before them. ... The Plaintiffs in their own pleadings under Para 13 of the Plaint have stated the effects of signing a consent#H....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top