Impact on Cash Deposits and Savings
Many individuals and entities had to deposit large sums of cash, often high-denomination banknotes, into banks during demonetisation periods. These deposits sometimes led to assessments of unexplained cash deposits, raising questions of source and legitimacy. For example, assessments for Rs. 11,35,500 and Rs. 13,87,000 were challenged on grounds that deposits were made due to demonetisation-related necessity LATE MANOHARASINGH THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SHRI SURAJ MANDLOI INDORE vs ITO 1(1) INDORE - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KASTURI LAL LUDHIANA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3 KHANNA KHANNA - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Legal and Tax Implications
The demonetisation period prompted legal scrutiny over cash holdings. Tax authorities often scrutinized deposits made during demonetisation, leading to additions to taxable income based on unexplained cash deposits. Some cases involved challenges on the grounds that deposits were made out of legitimate savings or due to compulsion, and that proper opportunity for personal hearing was not always provided S.M.I.L.E.Microfinance Ltd. vs The Asst. Commissioner of In - Madras, Jeewan Holdings Private Limited vs Union of India - Delhi.
Demonetisation Ordinances and Legal Framework
The government issued ordinances (e.g., 1978 and 1946) to demonetise high-denomination notes, which impacted personal finances by forcing individuals to exchange or deposit large cash holdings. These legal measures often resulted in the confiscation or scrutiny of cash, affecting personal assets SHANKARLAL VS STATE BANK OF INDIA - Calcutta.
Fake Currency and Legal Measures
Post-demonetisation, efforts to curb fake currency circulation involved declaring certain banknotes invalid, which impacted individuals holding high-denomination notes, and led to increased legal actions related to currency exchange and counterfeit detection Raj Kumar Goel VS Directorate of Enforcement - Delhi.
Financial Sector Changes
NBFCs expanded into new financial services during and after demonetisation, such as payments systems and capital markets, reflecting shifts in financial infrastructure that affected personal financial activities Regional Director VS Nahar Finance & Leasing Limited, Rep. , by its Managing Director, Navratnmull Nahar - Madras.
Demonetisation significantly influenced personal finances by compelling individuals to deposit and exchange high-denomination banknotes, often leading to legal and tax assessments based on unexplained deposits. Many faced scrutiny over the legitimacy of their cash holdings, with some cases highlighting the necessity of proper legal procedures and personal hearings. The legal framework surrounding demonetisation, including ordinances and RBI directives, aimed to curb counterfeit currency and promote transparency, but also created short-term disruptions in personal financial management. Overall, demonetisation acted as a catalyst for increased regulatory oversight and prompted individuals to adapt their financial strategies, often emphasizing the shift towards digital and formal banking channels.
References:
- Harprasad Ghashiram Gupta VS State. - Bombay
- LATE MANOHARASINGH THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SHRI SURAJ MANDLOI INDORE vs ITO 1(1) INDORE - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
- Raj Kumar Goel VS Directorate of Enforcement - Delhi
- SHANKARLAL VS STATE BANK OF INDIA - Calcutta
- S.M.I.L.E.Microfinance Ltd. vs The Asst. Commissioner of In - Madras
- Regional Director VS Nahar Finance & Leasing Limited, Rep. , by its Managing Director, Navratnmull Nahar - Madras
- Sudhanshu Dwivedi VS State of U. P. - Allahabad
- NC Jain vs Jaswant Lal Aneja - Delhi
- KASTURI LAL LUDHIANA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3 KHANNA KHANNA - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
- Jeewan Holdings Private Limited vs Union of India - Delhi
not belong to the mills and were not in prossession of the mills, on 11-1-1946, but belonged to the accused No. 3 and were in the personal ... HIGH DENOMINATION BANK NOTES (DEMONETISATION) ORDINANCE, 1946 - SECTION 7 - SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION - CENTRAL GOVERNMENT - AUTHENTICATION ... Fact of the Case: The accused were prosecuted under S. 7 of the High Denomination Notes (Demonetisation) Ordinance ... The latter was issued in order to provide for the demonetisation of certain high denomination notes. ... The accused we....
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 69A and 115BBE - Assessment Year 2017-18 - Addition of Rs. 11,35,500 for unexplained deposits during demonetization ... appeal arose from an assessment where the AO added Rs. 11,35,500 as unexplained cash deposit from agricultural income during the demonetization ... AR submitted that the assessee had to deposit his accumulated savings/ incomes in bank a/ c during demonetization period because of compulsion and necessity of demonetisation. With these submissions, Ld. AR prayed to delete th....
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 26 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government hereby declares that the specified bank notes shall cease to be legal tender with effect ... tender; ... And whereas, it has been found that fake currency notes of the specified bank notes have been largely in circulation and it has been found to be difficult to easily identify genuine bank notes from the fake ones and that the use of fake currency notes is causing adverse #H....
owned and possessed 261 bank currency notes of Rs. 1000/- each, tendered them for exchange under the High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation ... On Jan. 16, 1978, an ordinance was promulgated at the High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation) Ordinance, 1978 which was published in the Gazette on Jan. 16, 1978 and became an Act in 1978. The said Act came into force on 16th Jan. 1978. ... The petitioner's personal money could not be attached towards the tax liability of a company of which the petitioner was a director. There was no p....
2017-2018 - Petitioner, a non-deposit taking NBFC, challenged the addition of unexplained cash credit due to cash deposits during demonetization ... However, the contention of the respondent is that personal hearing was granted for the proceedings u/s143(2) on 19.8.2019 and 28.8.2019. Further all filing is through e-filing and no personal appearance was required. ... After filing the same the respondent ought to have granted personal hearing, but the respondent failed to do so. The contention of the respondent after fili....
Further, the report noted that NBFC have entered into many of the newer areas of financial services such as payments system, capital markets which includes underwriting, IPO financing, margin finance and M & A finances. ... Admittedly, the respondents have not sought for any personal hearing and had they done so, in all probabilities, personal hearing would have been offered, in the light of the stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit in paragraph 33. ... However, we are to examine the statutory framework....
Appropriation of funds was not done in accordance with the notification dated 2nd March, 2015 issued by the Ministry of Finance ... Praveen Kumar Gupta from March, 2017 in a private institution named Deewan Housing Finance Ltd (hereinafter referred to as ‘DHFL’) without taking the recommendation/cognizance of M.D./Chairman and without any authority of law in illegal and mala fide manner for personal gains. ... Thus, allegations in sum and substance are that the accused in furtherance of criminal conspiracy with malafide intention for #HL_....
were whether the delay in filing the written statement should be condoned and the implications of Defendant No.6's allegations of personal ... He submits that the same was necessitated due to the wedding of the daughter of Defendant No. 6 on 30th June 2021, to raise finances. ... It is also claimed that during the said period, the Defendant No.6 faced enormous difficulty due to demonetization. ... The order dated 25th January 2017 is clear are categorical to the effect that the Defendant no.6 undertook not to create any ....
was assessed for declaring an unexplained cash deposit of Rs. 13,87,000, which he asserted was derived from cash sales prior to demonetization ... Due to some personal reasons, I was not able to reach businesspremises in the banking hours on 05.12.2016, hence the cash was not deposited on that day. Hence the said cash was deposited on 06.12.2016. ... It was submitted that the reasons why the deposit of SBN could not be made on the next working day was duly submitted to the AO as next day was i.e, 03/12/2016 was Saturday and 04/12/2016 was Sunday and on Mon....
... ... Findings of Court: ... The court found the no opportunity of personal hearing was required in this instance, as the statutory ... In so far as the contention of the Petitioner that no personal hearing was given before cancelling the CoR is concerned, suffice would it be to note that the statutory framework does not mandate an opportunity of personal hearing. ... Therefore, the appellants were justified in stating that it would be an empty formality to provide an opportunity of personal hearing. ... It would hav....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.