AI Overview...
-
Incharge Salary - Employees posted temporarily in a higher or promotional post without formal promotion are often paid the salary of that higher post during the officiating period. Courts and tribunals have recognized that such incharge or officiating arrangements entitle the employee to the higher post's salary, arrears, and benefits, provided they fulfill certain conditions (e.g., prolonged service, official order). For example, in Nazrul Hassan Siddiqui VS Presiding Officer, Central Govt. Industrial-cum-Labour Court - Madhya Pradesh, the tribunal held the petitioner entitled to salary differences as Traffic Incharge from 1981 to 1983. Similarly, courts have upheld claims for officiating or incharge salary in various contexts, including education and administrative services. Nazrul Hassan Siddiqui VS Presiding Officer, Central Govt. Industrial-cum-Labour Court - Madhya Pradesh, State of Jharkhand VS Rajshree Bhardwaj - Jharkhand, Imtiyaz Ahamad VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad, State of Jharkhand VS Jai Prakash Singh - Jharkhand.
-
Officiating Salary - Refers to pay given to an employee who temporarily performs the duties of a higher post under official orders, often without the formal status of a promotion. This pay is usually the same as the substantive pay of the higher post during the officiating period, but it does not necessarily confer the right to permanent promotion or the full benefits of a regular appointment. Courts have clarified that officiating or incharge pay is not equivalent to a promotion and does not automatically entitle the employee to regular pay scales or arrears unless specific rules or orders specify otherwise (e.g., Assm Tombi Singh VS State of Manipur - Gauhati, Bipan Chand S/o. Shri Krishan Chand VS State Of Himachal Pradesh Through Secretary (Irrigation & Public Heath) to The Government Of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2 - Himachal Pradesh).
-
Key Differences:
- Legal Status: Incharge or officiating pay is granted temporarily, often based on official orders, and does not constitute a permanent promotion.
- Entitlement to Pay: Employees in incharge/officiating roles are generally entitled to the salary of the higher post for the duration of their officiating period, but this may not include arrears or retrospective benefits unless explicitly provided (e.g., State of Jharkhand VS Jai Prakash Singh - Jharkhand, Nazrul Hassan Siddiqui VS Presiding Officer, Central Govt. Industrial-cum-Labour Court - Madhya Pradesh).
-
Promotion vs. Incharge: Promotion involves a formal process and confers substantive status and benefits, whereas officiating or incharge status is usually a temporary arrangement without automatic promotion rights (e.g., Assm Tombi Singh VS State of Manipur - Gauhati, Bipan Chand S/o. Shri Krishan Chand VS State Of Himachal Pradesh Through Secretary (Irrigation & Public Heath) to The Government Of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2 - Himachal Pradesh).
-
Legal Principles:
- Courts have consistently held that officiating or incharge salary is payable when the employee performs the duties of a higher post for a significant period and under proper orders, but it is distinct from a substantive promotion (Nazrul Hassan Siddiqui VS Presiding Officer, Central Govt. Industrial-cum-Labour Court - Madhya Pradesh, Imtiyaz Ahamad VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad).
- The entitlement to arrears or higher pay depends on the specific rules governing the service and the nature of the officiating appointment (State of Jharkhand VS Jai Prakash Singh - Jharkhand, Assm Tombi Singh VS State of Manipur - Gauhati).
Summary:
The main difference between Incharge and Officiating Salary lies in their scope and legal implications. Incharge salary is paid when an employee temporarily performs the duties of a higher post, often with the expectation of entitlement to that pay during the officiating period. Officiating salary similarly applies to temporary postings but emphasizes the lack of automatic promotion or permanent status, and the pay is generally limited to the officiating period unless rules specify otherwise. Courts have upheld the right to officiating or incharge salary but distinguish it from substantive promotion, which involves a formal process and benefits.
Search Results for "Difference between Incharge and Officiating Salary"
1996 0 Supreme(MP) 610 • India - Madhya Pradesh
D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
capacity -- entitles him to raise a dispute for classification or promotion to that post -- he can claim the salary of that post ... (3) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 -- S.10 -- work discharged on promotion post by workman even in officiating ... Coming now to the merits of the case, the tribunal has come to the conclusion that the petitioner was entitled to the relief of being treated as Traffic Incharge between the period from 1.1.81 to 25.2.83 and consequent payment of difference of salary for that p....
2019 0 Supreme(Del) 498 • India - Delhi
VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Incharge
2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 3 • India - Jharkhand
D.N.PATEL, PRAMATH PATNAIK
Service Law—Salary—Jharkhand Service Code, 2001—Rules 58 and 103—Posting on promotional post as In-charge does not amount to regular ... right on him to claim regular scale of pay in said promoted post—Petitioner is not entitled to claim for payment of arrears of salary—Guarantee ... has been promoted with retrospective effect i.e. from 01.07.2001 as also arrears of difference of salary w.e.f. 02.07.2007 on which post he was promoted as Additional Director retrospectively. ... In such a case he does not get a s....
1979 0 Supreme(SC) 231 • India - Supreme Court
D.A.DESAI, A.P.SEN
Head Master/Principal or officiating service in the post whereas the State contended that the teacher claiming to be absorbed as ... AIR 1973 Madh Pra 104, on account of the use of the expressions such as "person appointed to be incharge of the current duties of ... that working on the post for a minimum period of 7 years would for the purpose of computation of 7 years include service even as incharge ... of Govt. dues and does not draw a salary. ... A period incharge of the post also works and discharg....
2023 0 Supreme(All) 1240 • India - Allahabad
VIKAS BUDHWAR
The Court held that the fifth respondent, Shoeb Ahmad Khan, was not eligible to be appointed as an Officiating/Incharge Principal ... Whether the fifth respondent, Shoeb Ahmad Khan, possessed the relevant eligibility for being appointed as an Officiating/Incharge ... prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the Committee of Management as well as District Inspector of Schools to make payment of salary ... continue as Officiating Principal and also consequently be paid salary#HL....
2022 0 Supreme(HP) 369 • India - Himachal Pradesh
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Punjab State Electricity Board and others reported in (2009)3 SCC 94, wherein it has been observed that it is well settled principle of law that senior cannot be paid lesser salary than his junior and in such circumstances, even if there was difference in incremental benefits in the scale given to Government ... Subject to the provisions of Rule 5, if the pay as fixed in the officiating post under sub-rule (1) is lower than the pay fixed in the substantive post, the former shall be fixed at the same stage as the substantive pay. ... all ....
2006 0 Supreme(Gau) 933 • India - Gauhati
P.G.AGARWAL, RANJAN GOGOI, H.N.SARMA
Similarly, an incumbent holding a higher post on incharge basis under an order without extra remuneration is not entitled to claim ... Petitioner was not entitled to the higher pay scale as the delegation order did not comply with Fundamental Rule 49, and there was a difference ... There is a gulf of difference between 'delegation' and 'promotion' having wide legal consequences. ... scale of pay of the post during his period of holding office as incharge headmaster. ... FR 49 provides that when a public servant is holdin....
2011 0 Supreme(Pat) 1597 • India - Patna
NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Law–Promotion–Instead of giving substantive promotions which would entail substantial payment, petitioners were given ad hoc or incharge ... There is a big difference between the substantive pay of Executive Engineer and that which the petitioners were being paid being substantive pay of Assistant Engineer plus allegedly 20% as the officiating pay. ... One as the learned counsel for the State points out the officiating pay. ... Learned counsel for the State points out that under the Bihar Service Code there is a provisio....
2022 0 Supreme(Jhk) 588 • India - Jharkhand
RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Salary Dispute - Applicability of Rule 58 of Bihar (Jharkhand) Service Code - Rule 89 and 103 of Jharkhand Service Code - The ... The petitioner claimed the salary attached to the higher posts, which was denied by the respondent-State of Jharkhand. ... court held the writ-petitioner entitled to the salary attached to the higher posts of Deputy Director, Additional Director, and Director ... The learned Single Judge has considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties and allowed the writ petition holding the writ-petitioner ....
2011 0 Supreme(MP) 1121 • India - Madhya Pradesh
K.K.TRIVEDI
, difference in pension, arrears of pension, and other retiral dues with interest, along with compensation for delay in payment. ... The petitioner claimed to have been made to work as Incharge Director Medical Services and was not promoted despite being found fit ... Promotion - Arrears of Salary - Pension - Writ Appeal No. 723/2006 - Model Code of Conduct - Director Medical Services - Kamla ... No. 1838/2010, for taking subsequent facts on record and pointed out that by an order dated 23.12.2009, the petitioner was paid the di....
Filter by Legal Phrase
