AI Overview...

Dileesh Viswanath - Summary

Legal Considerations in Family Court Transfers
The case referenced in AIR 2016 SC 3584, involving Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap, emphasizes that when transferring cases between Family Courts, courts must give special consideration to the inconvenience caused to the wife. This highlights the importance of prioritizing the welfare of women in family law proceedings. ASHA.S Vs M.NOUFAL - Kerala, CHINCHU vs DIJEESH - Kerala, ASHA.S vs M.NOUFAL - Kerala
Case Details and Parties Involved
Multiple cases involve individuals named Dileesh Viswanath, such as the Writ Petition No. 2940 of 2024, where Dilesh Kumar Banjare, aged about 33, is a petitioner working as a guest faculty in Chhattisgarh. The cases involve various respondents, including educational institutions and government bodies. Mukesh Tiwari vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. - Chhattisgarh
Insights on Judicial Approach
Courts are advised to consider the inconvenience to parties, especially women, in case transfer matters, reflecting a sensitive judicial approach towards family disputes. The references to multiple cases and counsel appearances indicate ongoing legal proceedings involving Dileesh Viswanath in family and service law contexts.

Analysis and Conclusion

Dileesh Viswanath appears in multiple legal contexts, notably in family law cases where courts prioritize the convenience and welfare of women, as established in Supreme Court judgments. His involvement in cases related to employment and family matters indicates active legal proceedings. The references underscore the judiciary's emphasis on fairness, especially regarding case transfers and the impact on involved parties.

Search Results for "Dileesh Viswanath"

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43776 • India - Kerala

2020 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53754 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 31337 • India - High Court of Kerala

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 21972 • India - High Court of Kerala

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J

Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap, reported in AIR 2016 SC 3584, etc. it has been held that in the matter of transfer of cases from one Family Court to another, inconvenience to wife should be given special consideration by the courts, etc. ... Heard Sri.Basant Balaji, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri.M.Dineesh the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent and Sri.M.Sreekumar, the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent. Though notice has been duly served, there is no appearance for the 2nd respondent.

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 91521 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap [AIR 2016 SC 3584] and Santhini v. ... RESPONDENT/S: DIJEESH,AGED 34 YEARS,S/O.

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 83787 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Hon`ble The CHIEF JUSTICE

P.Babu Krishna Talukdar Shehnaz Begum Mohammed Khalil Shaikh Umesh Sarkar Thamarai Selvi Dr.Niteen Vishwanath Dhepe Anantaram Mahapatra Mahesh Kumar Sharma P.Ram Mohan Appellants in Saba Nishat .. ... G.Sampath Suresh Babu Nabadwip Kumar Chowdhury Babul Chandra Das Harpreet Singh Basra K.Sivakumar Kumar A.S Mukesh Prajapat Dr.Nibas Kumar Saha Yeleti Raja Krishna Mohan Kuchi T.Chandra Sekhar Reddy Mahesh Kumar Sanghavi L.Krishnakumar A.Venkateswaran Dr.Janardan Khamaru D.Suresh Kumar J.Vinod Pillai Bileesh

2018 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 74504 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Heard Sri.Basant Balaji, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri.M.Dineesh the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent and Sri.M.Sreekumar, the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent. ... Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap reported in AIR 2016 SC 3584, etc. it has been held that in the matter of transfer of cases from one Family Court to another, inconvenience to wife should be given special consideration by the courts, etc. 6.

• India - Madras High Court

Umesh Sarkar __________ Page 2 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.Nos.464 to 466 of 2021 Thamarai Selvi Dr.Niteen Vishwanath ... Krishna Mohan Kuchi T.Chandra Sekhar Reddy Mahesh Kumar Sanghavi L.Krishnakumar A.Venkateswaran Dr.Janardan Khamaru D.Suresh Kumar J.Vinod Pillai Bileesh

• India - High Court of Kerala

Mukesh Tiwari vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

2024 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 15753 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

---- Respondents WPS No. 2940 of 2024  Dilesh Kumar Banjare S/o Dhana Ram Banjare Aged About 33 Years Working As Guest Faculty (Biology) At Govt. Naveen College, Hasoud, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Vishwanath Yadav Tamaskar P.G. Autonomous College, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ---- Petitioner Versus Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Principal Govt. Vishwanath Yadav Tamaskar P.G. ... Vishwanath Yadav Tamaskar P.G. Autonomous College, Durg District Durg (C.G.) 4. Dr. Lata Goswami W/o Hemant Puri Goswami Aged....

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?