1. Dilip K. Basu VS State Of W. B. - 23 Feb 01

India - Supreme Court

2. Dilip K. Basu VS State Of W. B. - 23 Feb 01

Custodial Violence-Directions issued by Supreme Court in Dilip K. ... Basu s case-Compliance report from State and UnionTerritories as well from Union of India-Response to suggestions and steps being ... Basu, etc. v. ... Basu v. State of West Bengal & Ors.1, in letter and spirit as well as to prevent custodial violence. ... **************** Parallel Citations of other Journals : Dilip

India - Supreme Court

3. DILIP K. BASU VS STATE OF W. B. - 12 Oct 01

Basu v. ... In Dilip K. ... Basu case is not frustrated. ... Basu case this Court gave certain basic as 11 requirements, in addition to the safeguards provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure

India - Supreme Court

4. State of Maharashtra VS Christian Community Welfare Council of India - 15 Oct 03

Dilip K. ... Basu, 1997 (II) MPWN 211 (SC) -- should also be medically examined. ... (1) Criminal P.C., 1973 -- Ss. 41, 53 and 54 -- arrestee -- should be dealt with according to direction given by Supreme Court in

India - Madhya Pradesh

5. KULWANT SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 15 Dec 15

.

(Vide: Dilip K. Basu v. State of W.B., N.C. Dhoundial v. ... C.L. ... C.L. Thukral, PW-12 SI Swaran Singh, PW-13 Krishan Chand, PW-17 Ashwani Kumar and exhibits.

India - Punjab

6. Dilip K. Basu, etc. etc. VS State of West Bengal - 23 Feb 01

Dilip K. Basu v. State of West Bengal & Ors., 1997(1) SCC 416. ... Basu v. State of West Bengal & Ors.1, in letter and spirit as well as to prevent custodial violence. ... precisely indicate the steps which the concerned State/Union Territory are taking to ensure compliance with all the directions given in Dilip

India - Crimes

7. Dilip K. Basu VS State Of W. B. - 07 Jul 00

India - Supreme Court

8. Dilip K. Basu VS State of West Bengal - 21 Jan 00

India - Supreme Court

9. PRITHIPAL SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 04 Nov 11

nbsp; (Paras 15 and 16) ... (C) ... n.M izfØ;k lafgrk] 1973] /kkjk 377 vkSj 386(c) & ;g izfrikfnr fl)kUr gS fd mPp U;k;ky; fuxjkuh ds {ks=kf/kdkj dk iz;ksx Lor% gh ... djrs gq,] fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr dks lqukbZ xbZ ltk dks c (Vide : Dilip K. Basu v. State of W.B. & Ors., AIR 1997 SC 3017; N.C. Dhoundial v. ... SCOPE OF SECTION 386(e) Cr.P.C. ... C. Smt.

India - Uttarakhand

10. Prithipal Singh Etc. VS State of Punjab - 04 Nov 11

1. State has an overriding obligation to protect the right to life of every person within its territorial jurisdiction. The obligation requires the State to take administrative and all other measures in order to protect life and investigate all suspicious deaths. (Para 7) 2. Law requires for adoption of a realistic approach rather than narrow technical approach in cases of custodial crimes. (Para 8) 3. In a case where the person is alleged to have died in police custody, it is difficult to get any kind of evidence. “Rarely in cases of police torture or custodial death, direct ocular evidence is available of the complicity of the police personnel, who alone can only explain the circumstances in which a person in their custody had died. Bound as they are by the ties of brotherhood, it is not unknown that police personnel prefer to remain silent and more often than not even pervert the truth to save their colleagues”. It is very difficult to get evidence against the policemen responsible for custodial death. (Para 41) 4. Recovery of the dead body is not a condition precedent for conviction of the accused for murder. (Para 47) 5. Police atrocities are always violative of the constitutional mandate, particularly, Article 21 (protection of life and personal liberty) and Article 22 (person arrested must be informed the grounds of detention and produced before the Magistrate within 24 hours). Such provisions ensure that arbitrary arrest and detention are not made. Tolerance of police atrocities, would amount to acceptance of systematic subversion and erosion of the rule of law. Therefore, illegal regime has to be glossed over with impunity, considering such cases of grave magnitude. (Para 47)

P.C. 1973 ¯ Section 386(e) ¯ Enhancement of sentence suo motu ¯ The High Court in exercise of its power under Section 386(e) Cr. ... P.C. is competent to enhance the sentence suo motu - However, such a course is permissible only after giving opportunity of hearing ... (Para 43) ... (c) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ¯ Section ... (Vide: Dilip K. Basu v. State of W.B. & Ors.,1 AIR 1997 SC 3017; N.C. Dhoundial v. ... C. Smt. ... SCOPE OF SECTION 386(e) Cr.P.C.

India - Supreme Court