AI Overview

AI Overview...

Directory of Revenue Intelligence

Main Points and Insights

Analysis and Conclusion

The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence functions as a key enforcement agency with a well-defined hierarchy of officers responsible for investigating violations of customs, excise, and revenue laws. While procedural provisions like Sections 42, 43, and 57 are designed to ensure proper investigation, courts have consistently clarified that these are directory rather than mandatory, allowing some procedural lapses without invalidating cases, provided the core investigation and evidence collection are sound.

This legal understanding provides operational flexibility to revenue officers while maintaining procedural discipline. The role of DRI officers is vital in gathering intelligence, executing investigations, and ensuring compliance with law, often relying on both oral and documentary evidence to build cases.

References

Search Results for "Directory of Revenue Intelligence"

Sundeep Mahendrakumar Sanghavi VS Union Of India

2020 0 Supreme(Guj) 994 India - Gujarat

VIKRAM NATH, J.B.PARDIWALA

Director of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. ... or Assistant Directors in the Directorate General of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence. ... Generals, Additional Directors or Joint Directors, Deputy Directors or Assistant Directors in the Directorate General of Revenue Intelligence. ... Genera....

State of H. P.  VS Sanjeev Kumar

2011 0 Supreme(HP) 1796 India - Himachal Pradesh

V.K.SHARMA, R.B.MISRA

Section 57 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the mandatory provisions of Section 42(1) and (2) of the Act, the directory ... Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, 2003 Supreme Court Cases (Cri.) 2024 and G. Srinivas Goud vs. State of A.P., AIR 2005 Supreme Court 3647. ... 9. Section 57 of the Act is directory in nature. ... Secondly though it has been held that provisions of Section 57 of the Act are directory, yet total non compliance thereof as in....

State of H. P.  VS Sanjeev Kumar

2011 0 Supreme(HP) 1814 India - Himachal Pradesh

R.B.MISRA, V.K.SHARMA

It also emphasized the directory nature of Section 57 and the importance of compliance with procedural requirements. ... Psychotropic Substances Act - Section 42(1) and (2), Section 57 - The court discussed the mandatory provisions of Section 42 and the directory ... Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, 2003 Supreme Court Cases (Cri.) 2024 and G. Srinivas Goud vs. State of A.P., AIR 2005 Supreme Court 3647. ... 9. Section 57 of the Act is directory in nature. ......

State of H. P.  VS Sanjeev Kumar

2011 0 Supreme(HP) 1797 India - Himachal Pradesh

R.B.MISRA, V.K.SHARMA

and (2), Section 57 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the mandatory provisions of Section 42(1) and (2) and the directory ... of the Court: The court found that the provisions of Section 42 were not applicable in the present case, emphasized the directory ... Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, 2003 Supreme Court Cases (Cri.) 2024 and G. Srinivas Goud vs. State of A.P., AIR 2005 Supreme Court 3647. ... 9. Section 57 of the Act is directory in nat....

State of Himachal Pradesh VS Kushal Chand alias Kushalu

2010 0 Supreme(HP) 898 India - Himachal Pradesh

V.K.SHARMA, R.B.MISRA

Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence 2003 SCC (Cri) 2024, G. Sriniwas Goud vs. ... court held that the provisions of Section 42 were not applicable in the present case and that the provisions of Section 57 were directory ... Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence 2003 SCC (Cri) 2024 and G. Sriniwas Goud vs. State of A.P., AIR 2005 SC-3647. 12. ... Secondly, though it has been held that the provisions of Section 57 of the Act are #HL....

Guneshgar VS State of Rajasthan

2008 0 Supreme(Raj) 887 India - Rajasthan

DEO NARAYAN THANVI

Having bestowed consideration on the applicability of Sections 42 and 43 of the Act, it is clear from the language used in Section 42(1) that if any such officer of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the Central Government or any such ... According to him, these provisions are not mandatory but directory in nature. As regards the non-production of the Malkhana articles in the court, he submitted that though the articles have not been produced but controlled sample has bee....

Guneshgar VS State of Rajasthan

India - Crimes

DEO NARAYAN THANVI

Having bestowed consideration on the applicability of Sections 42 and 43 of the Act, it is clear from the language used in Section 42(1) that if any such officer of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the Central Government or any such ... According to him, these provisions are not mandatory but directory in nature. As regards the non-production of the Malkhana articles in the court, he submitted that though the articles have not been produced but controlled sample has bee....

Mushaque Ahammed @ Muthu, S/o.  Shaik Ali VS Sub Inspector Of Police

2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 240 India - Kerala

R.NARAYANA PISHARADI

Assistant Director, Director of Revenue Intelligence : AIR 2003 SC 4311, State of Haryana v. Jarnail Singh : AIR 2004 SC 2491, Srinivas Goud v. State of Andhra Pradesh : AIR 2005 SC 3647, Yasihey Yobin v.

Atul D.  Pandya VS Union Of India

2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2462 India - Bombay

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, BHARATI H.DANGRE

Intelligence (DRI for short) - Petitioner kept a very close watch on activities of se ecommerce companies - He found that one M/ ... violation of laws made by Parliament - All respondents before this Court are Officers of a Directorate styled as Directorate of Revenue ... producing his own documents would have to be afforded followed by or witnesses- Equal opportunities would have to be afforded to revenue ... There was further research and study and a report was submitted to the 2nd respondent and the Director General o....

SUNIL KUMAR YADAV VS UNION OF INDIA

2018 0 Supreme(All) 386 India - Allahabad

DINESH KUMAR SINGH I

He had received this information orally from Deputy Director, Revenue, Intelligence Directorate, Lucknow Dinesh Baudh on phone and was instructed to act upon that. At the time of occurrence his senior officer was Shri R.L. Pathak, Senior Intelligence Officer. ... On 5.2.2011 at about 8:00 am Intelligence Officer Arvind Kumar Srivastava (PW-1) of Directorate Revenue Intelligence, Gorakhpur Branch received an specific information that a truck bearing Registration No. ......

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top