AI Overview

AI Overview...

Discrimination on Colour of Skin Offence

Analysis and Conclusion

Discrimination on the basis of skin colour and caste continues to be a critical issue addressed through legal statutes, societal activism, and forensic science. While laws aim to prevent and punish such discrimination, societal attitudes often perpetuate prejudices. Efforts to promote equality and challenge stereotypes are ongoing, emphasizing that the true measure of a person lies beyond physical appearance Aveek Sarkar VS State of West Bengal - Crimes, Murugan VS State of Tamilnadu, represented by the Chief Secretary - Madras, R. P. Mishra VS Runki Devi - Patna.


References: - Aveek Sarkar VS State of West Bengal - Crimes - ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA VS SATISH - Supreme Court - Amarjit Singh VS State Of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana - Aveek Sarkar VS State of West Bengal - Supreme Court - Valarmathi & Others VS State rep. by Inspector of Police - Madras - Rashida Tripura, S/o. Sri Gajendra Tripura VS State of Tripura - Tripura - Murugan VS State of Tamilnadu, represented by the Chief Secretary - Madras - R. P. Mishra VS Runki Devi - Patna

Search Results for "Discrimination on Colour of Skin Offence"

Aveek Sarkar VS State of West Bengal

India - Crimes

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, A.K.SIKRI

prevalent in Germany – Supporting inter-racial relationship – Conveying message that colour of skin matters little and love champions ... fiancée taken by her father – Photograph has no tendency to deprave or corrupt the minds of people – To protest against racial discrimination ... over colour – Photograph and article not objectionable so as to initiate proceedings under Section 292 IPC or under Section 4 of ... The message, the photograph wants to convey is that the colour of skin ma....

ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA VS SATISH

2021 8 Supreme 211 India - Supreme Court

would lead to absurd interpretation of said provision – “Skin to skin contact” for constituting an offence of “sexual assault” could ... under Section 8 of POCSO Act, and convicting him for the offence under Sections 342 and 354 of the IPC. ... of sexual assault under Section 7 of POCSO Act – Most important ingredient for constituting offence of sexual assault under Section ... “skin to skin contact” for constituting an offence of “sexual assault” co....

Amarjit Singh VS State Of Punjab

2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 683 India - Punjab and Haryana

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

Racial Discrimination - Government Circulars - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Punjab Police Rules - Scheduled Castes and the ... Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Fact of the Case: The court addressed the issue of racial discrimination ... Final Decision: The court acknowledged the government's efforts to address racial discrimination and closed the case with ... colour. ... After all, the mind has no skin. May I ask, what colour is God's skin....

Aveek Sarkar VS State of West Bengal

2014 1 Supreme 535 India - Supreme Court

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, A.K.SIKRI

prevalent in Germany – Supporting inter-racial relationship – Conveying message that colour of skin matters little and love champions ... fiancée taken by her father – Photograph has no tendency to deprave or corrupt the minds of people – To protest against racial discrimination ... over colour – Photograph and article not objectionable so as to initiate proceedings under Section 292 ... The message, the photograph wants to convey is that the colour of skin matters little and love cham....

Valarmathi & Others VS State rep. by Inspector of Police

2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2650 India - Madras

P.D.DINAKARAN, M.THANIKACHALAM

Tongue and mouth reddish in colour. Skin peeling off. Head bluish blackish in colour. Umbilical cord tied with piece of cloth. No evidence of external injuries. ... Internal Examination:- Mouth red in colour. Tongue red in colour, Small sore seen. ... Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri, convicted the accused and sentenced, A-1 for the offence under Sections 302 and 302 r/w 201 I.P.C., A-2 and A-3 for the offence under Sections 302 r/w 34 and 302 r/w 201 I.P.C., which are imp....

M. Rajamanickam VS Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited and Another

1997 0 Supreme(Mad) 526 India - Madras

A.R.LAKSHMANAN

II near the, Main Hospital Premises with an Olive green colour cotton bag with marking "N. A. ... While this being the state of affairs, the appellant cannot be said to have committed the offence. It is only subsequently, the said Meenakshisundaram, in order to save his skin, would have thrown the blame on the appellant. ... While this being the state of affairs, by no stretch of imagination the appellant cannot be said to have committed the offence. It is only subsequently that the said Meenakshisundaram in order to sav....

Rashida Tripura, S/o.  Sri Gajendra Tripura VS State of Tripura

2021 0 Supreme(Tri) 61 India - Tripura

AKIL KURESHI, ARINDAM LODH

POCSO Act, - Section 42 - Penal Code, 1860 - Section 376D, Section 302 read with Section 34 - Offence of ... DNA decides the characteristics of the person such as the colour of the skin, type of hair, nails and so on. Using this genetic fingerprinting identification of an individual is done like in the traditional method of identifying fingerprints of offenders. ... On identification, pachra, black colour T-shirt and the panty were marked as Exbt.M.O.1 series. 18.2. ... Not only does this process have the potential for a....

Murugan VS State of Tamilnadu, represented by the Chief Secretary

2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 1407 India - Madras

K.CHANDRU

Untouchability - Caste Discrimination - Abolition of Untouchability - Article 17, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention ... But that will not be a case where human walls erected on the basis of colour or creed or caste. When colored people of the USA were denied dignity and equal treatment in transport, Rosa Park, a brave black woman, led a successful protest against apartheid and blatant discrimination. ... Board of Education, sat in a bench dealing with reverse discrimination. ... The dream of America as the....

R. P. Mishra VS Runki Devi

2000 0 Supreme(Pat) 1342 India - Patna

RAVI S.DHAVAN, SHASHANK KR.SINGH

But the State and its law prohibit discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste and sex. The Appellant has shown prejudice to colour of skin. The Appellant has claimed superior status by caste and by ostracising his sons wife practises untouchability; a scourge abolished by the Constitution. ... He has ostracised Runki Devi as inferior by refusing to permit his son to associate with his bride on a misplaced arrogance of colour of skin and a superior caste. This is untouchability, the appellant R.P....

BALBIR SINGH VS STATE

2010 0 Supreme(Del) 262 India - Delhi

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, SURESH KAIT

Wrought with discrimination and prejudiced by rituals, Indian society has dealt the girl child a rough hand starting even before her birth and ending with the dusk of her life. ... An area of burn injury (11 x 9 cm), dark brown in colour and its margins are irregular and situated in upper part of chest on left side in front and more on medial side and its upper boundary is seen at base of neck and cuts all layer of skin in this area is seen absent. ... The tongue is often swollen, bruised, protruding and dark in colour, ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top