AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Paternity - Main Points and Insights
  • The courts often base paternity findings on admissions made in legal petitions, especially under the Hindu Marriage Act, as seen in cases where paternity was established through the petitioner's own admission Gian Chand VS Mohinder Devi - Punjab and Haryana.
  • Evidence such as official records (e.g., electoral rolls) is generally considered inadmissible to prove paternity or cohabitation, emphasizing the need for direct evidence Parvathi Ammal and others VS S. Madathi Ammal and others - Madras.
  • Disputes over paternity frequently involve factual determinations by the courts, which are considered conclusive unless shown to be perverse or based on no evidence Hamza VS Sara - Kerala, Parmeswaran Nair VS Janaki Amma - Kerala.
  • In cases involving maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, courts have refused DNA tests to determine paternity, citing procedural and evidentiary considerations, and emphasizing that findings in such proceedings are not final but based on available evidence Manik Chandra Ankure VS State of West Bengal - Crimes, MANIK CHANDRA ANKURE VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. - Calcutta.
  • Courts recognize that paternity disputes are factual issues that require thorough examination of evidence, and they uphold findings made by lower courts unless there is a compelling reason to overturn them Paravathi Ammal VS S. Madathi Ammal - Madras.

  • Analysis and Conclusion

  • The main approach in paternity pure findings of fact involves evaluating direct admissions, witness testimony, and documentary evidence. Courts tend to uphold factual findings made by lower courts unless they are arbitrary, perverse, or unsupported by evidence.
  • Evidence such as official records (e.g., electoral rolls) is generally not sufficient to establish paternity, highlighting the importance of direct or corroborative evidence.
  • Courts exercise caution in ordering DNA tests or other scientific methods in paternity cases, often relying on the evidence already on record.
  • Overall, paternity findings are primarily factual determinations based on the evidence presented, and appellate courts generally respect these unless they are clearly unjustified Gian Chand VS Mohinder Devi - Punjab and Haryana, Hamza VS Sara - Kerala.

References: - Paravathi Ammal VS S. Madathi Ammal - Madras, Parvathi Ammal and others VS S. Madathi Ammal and others - Madras, Gian Chand VS Mohinder Devi - Punjab and Haryana, RAMA PANDEY VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi, Hamza VS Sara - Kerala, Nagesh Kumar VS Nagesh Hosiery Exports - Delhi, Manik Chandra Ankure VS State of West Bengal - Crimes, MANIK CHANDRA ANKURE VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. - Calcutta, Madan Gopal VS Raja Pratap Singh - Rajasthan, Parmeswaran Nair VS Janaki Amma - Kerala

Search Results for "Findings as to Paternity Pure Finding of Fact"

Paravathi Ammal VS S. Madathi Ammal

2002 0 Supreme(Mad) 267 India - Madras

PRABHA SRIDEVAN

[FINDING OF THE COURT] The court directed the lower court to provide findings on the existence of marriage, evidence of cohabitation ... Marriage - Property Dispute - Evidence of Marriage, Cohabitation, and Paternity - [FACT OF THE CASE] The suit involved a dispute ... [FINAL DECISION] The judgment of the lower court was set aside, and the lower court was directed to provide findings on the crucial ... ... The lower Court is directed to give its finding on these three issues after giv....

Parvathi Ammal and others VS S. Madathi Ammal and others

2002 0 Supreme(Mad) 268 India - Madras

PRABHA SRIDEVAN

made in the electoral rolls not admissible in evidence as proof of the date of marriage or the period of cohabitation-As regards paternity-Welfare ... ... The lower Court is directed to give its finding on these three issues after giving an opportunity to the parties to adduce oral and documentary evidence and return the evidence together with its findings to this Court on or before July 2, 2002. ... ... On receipt of the findings this Court will decide the entitlement of the respondents to a share in the other propert....

Gian Chand VS Mohinder Devi

1991 0 Supreme(P&H) 498 India - Punjab and Haryana

S.S.RATHOR

upholding the trial court's finding of paternity based on the petitioner's admission in a petition under the Hindu Marriage Act. ... in a petition under the Hindu Marriage Act established paternity, and the issue of paternity was a question of fact already decided ... Maintenance - Family Law - The court upheld the maintenance order for the minor child, finding that the petitioner's admission ... Over and above this, whether respondent No. 2, Manjit is the son of the petitioner or not,....

RAMA PANDEY VS UNION OF INDIA

2015 0 Supreme(Del) 1468 India - Delhi

RAJIV SHAKDHER

Finding of the Court: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to maternity leave under Rule 43(1) of the Central ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner, a female government servant, applied for maternity leave and child care leave after ... TO MATERNITY LEAVE - HELD, COMMISSIONING MOTHER ENTITLED TO MATERNITY LEAVE UNDER RULE 43(1). ... ... (3) The paternity Leave may be combined with leave of any other kind. ... (4) The paternity leave s....

Hamza  VS Sara

1991 0 Supreme(Ker) 489 India - Kerala

T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN

Finding of the Court: The trial court and the appellate court found against the appellant, concluding that the appellant ... Paternity Dispute - Mohammedan Law - S.112 of the Evidence Act Fact of the Case: The appellant filed a suit seeking ... Issues: The main issues were the paternity of the second respondent and the validity of the marriage between the appellant ... These are factual findings on pure questions of fact and I do not find any justification for int....

Nagesh Kumar VS Nagesh Hosiery Exports

2013 0 Supreme(Del) 268 India - Delhi

S.MURALIDHAR

Finding of the Court: The Court found that the impugned order of the CLB was not legally tenable and set it aside to ... Fact of the Case: The case involves a dispute between family members over the ownership and management of a company ... The learned counsel for the appellant argued that the High Court could not disturb the findings of fact arrived at by the Company Law Board. ... It is settled law that if a finding of fact is perverse and is based on no evidence, it can be set a....

Manik Chandra Ankure VS State of West Bengal

India - Crimes

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA

— Legality — Object of provision was to prevent starvation and vagrancy and provided for summary procedure — Findings in such proceedings ... — Section 125 — Maintenance petition by wife praying maintenance for herself and for her minor son — Respondent husband denying paternity ... of child moved application for holding DNA test to determine paternity of child — Application dismissed by Sessions Court in revision ... The High Court refused to interfere with the aforesaid finding in the second appeal on the premise that ....

MANIK CHANDRA ANKURE VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

2003 0 Supreme(Cal) 433 India - Calcutta

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA

Finding of the Court: The court held that the order for D. N. ... C. is to prevent starvation and vagrancy and that the findings in such proceedings are not final. ... C. is to prevent starvation and vagrancy. * The findings in a maintenance proceeding under Section 125, Cr. P. ... The High Court refused to interfere with the aforesaid finding in the second appeal on the premise that "the question whether Roshan Lal is the son of the plaintiff is a pure question of fact which calls f....

Madan Gopal VS Raja Pratap Singh

1963 0 Supreme(Raj) 240 India - Rajasthan

JAGAT NARAYAN

The findings with regard to the public nature of the temples referred to by me above are tentative findings. It will be open to the trial court to give a finding that the temples are not public temples but are private temples if the evidence on record in its opinion leads to that conclusion. ... ... The learned District Judge recorded an order on this application that he shall not determine the question whether or not it is necessary to give notice to the Devasthan Commissioner till after he had recorded the entire evidence in the suit a....

Parmeswaran Nair VS Janaki Amma

1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 141 India - Kerala

P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI

challenge the findings of the lower courts. ... Paternity - Family Law - Evidence Act, Section 112 Fact of the Case: The case involves a dispute over the paternity ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the evidence presented by the first defendant, corroborated by witnesses ... JUDGMENT:- ... I have given anxious consideration to the facts of the case in spite of the concurrent findings of fact by the courts below. The question is one of paterni....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top