AI Overview...
-
Fraudulent Decree and Attempted Invalidity of Attachment Orders
Several cases highlight that defendants have engaged in fraudulent and bogus steps aimed at undermining or invalidating attachment orders. For example, in INDBOM00000005886 and INDBOM00000001873, courts found that defendants' actions, such as attempting to sell mortgaged land or horses during ongoing proceedings, were fraudulent and aimed at reducing the plaintiffs’ stakes, indicating an intent to deceive or manipulate the legal process. Dharmil A. Bodani for self as one of the Executors under the Will of Late Mrs. Chandrika A. Bodani vs MANJU MEADOWS PVT.LTD.and ORS. - Bombay, Dharmil A. Bodani for self as one of the Executors under the Will of Late Mrs. Chandrika A. Bodani vs MANJU MEADOWS PVT.LTD.and ORS. - Bombay -
Legal Restrictions on Sale of Land of Bhumiswamis in Execution of Court Orders
Multiple sources (INDMP00000011895, 02700049568) emphasize that under specific laws, lands owned by Bhumiswamis (traditional landholders) cannot be sold in execution of court decrees if such sale would result in the land exceeding prescribed ceiling limits or entitle the purchaser to land beyond permissible extents. These provisions serve to protect Bhumiswamis from losing their land unlawfully through attachment or sale, thereby invalidating any such sale that violates these restrictions. Mannu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh, Anand Choudhary VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh -
Fraudulent Transactions and Invalid Attachments in Corporate Debt Recovery
Several judgments (INDNCLAT00000000592, 00629, 00631, 00595, 00642, 02473) detail cases where recovery applications and attachment orders were challenged on grounds of preferential, undervalued, or fraudulent transactions. In particular, the Respondent's application (IA No.51 of 2020) questioned the validity of transactions undertaken by a suspended director, asserting that these were fraudulent and aimed at defeating creditors’ rights. Courts scrutinized such transactions to prevent fraudulent conveyances from invalidating attachment orders. STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND (SASF) VS MR.PIYUSH PERIWAL & ORS. - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Sandeep Khaitan VS Piyush Periwal & Ors. - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND ( SASF) VS MR. PIYUSH PERIWAL & ORS. - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Sandeep Khaitan VS PIYUSH PERIWAL & Ors. - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND (SASF) VS PIYUSH PERIWAL & ORS - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, PLBB PRODUCTS PVT LTD VS 1. MR PIYUSH PERIWAL 2. STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND 3.MR SANDIP KHAITAN 4. MR ANAND VARMA ADVOCATE 5. PRAFUL JINDAL ADVOCATE & ORS - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Analysis and Conclusion
The collective insights indicate that courts recognize and invalidate fraudulent or sham decrees, especially those intended to defeat attachment orders. Laws protecting Bhumiswamis from unlawful sale in execution proceedings further reinforce the importance of lawful procedures. In corporate debt recovery, courts are vigilant against fraudulent transactions designed to obstruct creditors’ rights, and they scrutinize such transactions to uphold the integrity of attachment and recovery processes. Overall, attempts to use fraudulent decrees or proceedings to invalidate attachment orders are subject to judicial scrutiny and are typically invalidated when proven to be fraudulent or contrary to statutory protections.
Search Results for "Fraudulent Decree to Invaliday the Attachment Order"
2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 5755 • India - Bombay High Court
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J
... ... Result: Suit partly decreed. ... of such judgment, order or decree, is a fact in issue, or is relevant, under some other provision of this Act.” ... That the series of steps shown to have been taken by the contesting Defendants are not only bogus and fraudulent but are aimed at reducing Plaintiffs’ stake from majority to minority. ... Shamrao Vithal Bank had issued Notice for attachment and sale of the mortgaged land due to non-payment of its dues. Plaint alleges attempts on the part of the con....
2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 237 • India - High Court of Bombay
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J
... ... Result:The suit is partly decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. ... Shamrao Vithal Bank had issued Notice for attachment and sale of the mortgaged land due to non-payment of its dues. Plaint alleges attempts on the part of the contesting Defendants in selling several horses when suit was filed. ... ORDER280) I accordingly proceed to pass the following Order : a) Plaintiffs’ suit is partly decreed with costs. ... Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in Sections 40, 41 and 42, when relevant.....
2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1073 • India - High Court of Madhya Pradesh
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, CJ, SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, J, VIVEK JAIN, J
(5) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other enactment for the time being in force, no land of a Bhumiswami shall, in execution of a decree or order of a court, be sold to any person who as a result of such sale shall become entitled to land which together with the ... or sale in execution of any decree or order as is in excess of five acres of irrigated or ten acres of unirrigated land;] (b) no land comprised in a holding of a Bhumiswami belonging to a tribe which has been declared to be an aboriginal ... ....
2025 0 Supreme(MP) 46 • India - Madhya Pradesh
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, S. A. DHARMADHIKARI, VIVEK JAIN
pending and reported to the Collector in terms of section 110(7) MPLRC by the Tehsildar, in the manner discussed in detail in this order ... (5) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other enactment for the time being in force, no land of a Bhumiswami shall, in execution of a decree or order of a court, be sold to any person who as a result of such sale shall become entitled to land which together with the ... land, if any, held by himself or by his family will in the aggregate exceed such ceiling limits as may be prescribed;....
2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 369 • India - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) , Hon'ble Mr. Barun Mitra (Member (Technical)) ,
After obtaining a decree and negotiating a settlement with the principal borrower in 2005, sometimes in the year 2009, the respondent filed a recovery application in the pending OA (OA No.27/2002) seeking an order of attachment for the aforesaid movable and immovable property which was mortgaged to IDBI ... The Application IA No.51 of 2020 was filed by the RP alleging preferential, undervalued and fraudulent transactions undertaken by suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor. The RP in the Application has questioned 1....
2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 372 • India - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) , Hon'ble Mr. Barun Mitra (Member (Technical)) ,
After obtaining a decree and negotiating a settlement with the principal borrower in 2005, sometimes in the year 2009, the respondent filed a recovery application in the pending OA (OA No.27/2002) seeking an order of attachment for the aforesaid movable and immovable property which was mortgaged to IDBI ... The Application IA No.51 of 2020 was filed by the RP alleging preferential, undervalued and fraudulent transactions undertaken by suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor. The RP in the Application has questioned 1....
2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 368 • India - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) , Hon'ble Mr. Barun Mitra (Member (Technical)) ,
After obtaining a decree and negotiating a settlement with the principal borrower in 2005, sometimes in the year 2009, the respondent filed a recovery application in the pending OA (OA No.27/2002) seeking an order of attachment for the aforesaid movable and immovable property which was mortgaged to IDBI ... The Application IA No.51 of 2020 was filed by the RP alleging preferential, undervalued and fraudulent transactions undertaken by suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor. The RP in the Application has questioned 1....
2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 371 • India - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) , Hon'ble Mr. Barun Mitra (Member (Technical)) ,
After obtaining a decree and negotiating a settlement with the principal borrower in 2005, sometimes in the year 2009, the respondent filed a recovery application in the pending OA (OA No.27/2002) seeking an order of attachment for the aforesaid movable and immovable property which was mortgaged to IDBI ... The Application IA No.51 of 2020 was filed by the RP alleging preferential, undervalued and fraudulent transactions undertaken by suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor. The RP in the Application has questioned 1....
2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 370 • India - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) , Hon'ble Mr. Barun Mitra (Member (Technical)) ,
After obtaining a decree and negotiating a settlement with the principal borrower in 2005, sometimes in the year 2009, the respondent filed a recovery application in the pending OA (OA No.27/2002) seeking an order of attachment for the aforesaid movable and immovable property which was mortgaged to IDBI ... The Application IA No.51 of 2020 was filed by the RP alleging preferential, undervalued and fraudulent transactions undertaken by suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor. The RP in the Application has questioned 1....
2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 295 • India - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) , Hon'ble Mr. Barun Mitra (Member (Technical)) ,
After obtaining a decree and negotiating a settlement with the principal borrower in 2005, sometimes in the year 2009, the respondent filed a recovery application in the pending OA (OA No.27/2002) seeking an order of attachment for the aforesaid movable and immovable property which was mortgaged to IDBI ... The Application IA No.51 of 2020 was filed by the RP alleging preferential, undervalued and fraudulent transactions undertaken by suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor. The RP in the Application has questioned 1....
Filter by Legal Phrase
