AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
A genuine contract is one that accurately reflects the true employment relationship, distinguished from sham or camouflage arrangements designed to evade legal obligations. Courts and authorities assess the nature of the contract through evidence, focusing on the actual relationship rather than just the written document. When a contract is genuine, legal remedies and protections are applied accordingly; when not, the arrangement may be invalidated, and appropriate legal action can be taken to address exploitation or evasion.

Search Results for "Genuine Contract"

Executive Engineer VS Inspector of Factories

2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 957 India - Madras

S.VAIDYANATHAN

It held that the Inspector of Factories was empowered to decide on unfair labour practices and a genuine contract system. ... contract system. ... the legislation and held that the Inspector of Factories was empowered to decide whether there was unfair labour practice and a genuine ... Similarly, he can decide whether there is a genuine contract system or not. ... If there is a genuine contract, the remedy for the workmen is not under the 1981 Act. T....

Paschim Banga Byabasyi Sramik Sangstha VS Union of India

2001 0 Supreme(Cal) 771 India - Calcutta

AMITAVA LALA

CONTRACT SYSTEM - DISTINCTION BETWEEN CONTRACT LABOUR AND GENUINE CONTRACT SYSTEM - INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 14 - PROVISO - APPLICABILITY ... bank's remittances, as the work is perennial in nature and not a genuine contract system. 2. ... OF CONTRACT LABOUR - APPLICABILITY OF ACT TO LESS THAN 20 WORKMEN - INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 10 - SCOPE OF SECTION 10 - GENUINE ... If there is a genuine contract system then ob....

BALARAM BARIK VS BANAMBARA MAHARANA

1982 0 Supreme(Ori) 12 India - Orissa

P.K.MOHANTY

specific performance - sale of land - The court found that the plaintiff had a genuine contract for the sale of land with defendant ... Fact of the Case: The plaintiff had a genuine contract for the sale of land with defendant No. 1, who received part ... Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the plaintiff had a genuine contract for the sale of land with defendant No. 1, who ... between the plaintiff and the defendant No. 1 and that the deed of contract (Ext. 1) is....

NUCHIYIL LANEESH vs SHOBHA K.

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 10637 India - High Court of Kerala

A.HARIPRASAD, J

Specific Performance - Contract Law - Sale Agreement - Sections Not Explicitly Cited - The court affirmed trial and appellate ... findings that the sale agreement was not genuine, leading to dismissal of the plaintiff's request for specific performance. ... Fact of the Case: The second appeal arose from trials where the sale agreement (Ext.A1) was deemed non-genuine, leading ... So much so, the trial court and the lower appellate court on appreciation of evidence found that the appellant is not entitled to get specific performance of th....

UTTAR PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL IV, UTTAR PRADESH, AGRA

2001 0 Supreme(All) 934 India - Allahabad

S.K.SINGH

The court also emphasized the need for a genuine contract system and the role of the appropriate Government in abolishing contract ... Contract Labour - Dispute over termination of workers - Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act - Section 10, Payment of ... Government can do so under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act. ... was not genuine. ... If, however, he comes to the conclusion that the contract is #HL_STAR....

Sharad Vishwas Bhamre VS General Manager, M/s. Mahindra Sons Limited

2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 941 India - Bombay

S.C.GUPTE

post thereafter and other analogous considerations - Emphasis of our Court in judgment of on whether contractual employment was genuine ... contract for specified period or was it device simply to get away from provisions of Section Act - This is what Court has to consider ... continued beyond this period of one year - There is no other allegation which requires Court to consider fairness or otherwise contract ... The emphasis of our Court in the judgment of Dilip Hanumantrao Shirke is on whether the contractual employment was a #HL_START....

Employers in relation to the Management of Rajrappa Coal Washery of Central Coalfields Limited VS Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Dhanbad

2012 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1208 India - Jharkhand

APARESH KUMAR SINGH

labour for work of any establishment under a genuine contract or is mere ruse/ camouflage to evade compliance with various legislations ... Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970-Section 10-regularization- Tribunal held them entitled for regularization from ... the date of award-in a case of reference made seeking regularization of workmen engaged through contract labour after said prohibition ... genuine or camouflage. ... a genuine contract or is a mer....

Basant Lal VS State Of Punjab

2007 0 Supreme(P&H) 1608 India - Punjab and Haryana

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, S.D.ANAND

contract. ... dismissed, upholding the Labour Court's finding that the workman was not employed by the principal employer and was covered by a genuine ... of the employment relationship and the validity of the contract between the principal employer and the contractor. ... It was also found that there was no genuine contract labour system. The said judgment is, thus, distinguishable. ... 14. ... (supra), the finding recorded by the Labour Court that the workman was not employed by the principal employe....

Bharatlal VS Kasturibai

2012 0 Supreme(Chh) 142 India - Chhattisgarh

N.K.AGARWAL

Section 92 of the Evidence Act does not preclude a party from showing that the writing is not really a contract between the parties ... Section 92 of the Evidence Act excludes the oral evidence to vary the terms of a written contract but has no reference to the question whether the parties agreed to contract on the terms set forth in the document. ... To put it differently, the bar is to oral evidence to disprove the terms of a contract, and not to disprove the contract itself, or to prove that the docu....

Mukand Limited VS Dharmarajya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangha

2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 998 India - Bombay

S.C.GUPTE

persons concerned were regular workmen courts going by evidence produced before m did not treat ir engagement as trainees as a genuine ... contract of traineeship; and as discussed above se conclusions do not admit of any interference under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution ... Both courts below have found, as a matter of fact, going by the nature of work performed, that the persons concerned were regular workmen; the courts, going by the evidence produced before them, did not treat their engagement as trainees as a genuine c....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top