AI Overview...
-
Gitanjali Gajanan Tendulkar - Central figure in a 1989 Bombay High Court case involving maintenance rights Gitanjali Gajanan Tendulkar VS Gajanan Dinkar Tendulkar - Bombay, Husband VS Wife - Bombay, Shivaji s/o Baburao Bhabad @ Bhawad VS Sau. Alka w/o Shivaji Bhabad @ Bhawad - Bombay, SHIVAJI BABURAO BHABAD ALIAS BHAWAD AND ANR vs ALKA SHIVAJI BHABAD ALIAS BHAWAD AND ANR - Bombay.
-
Court Decision - The Bombay High Court, in Gitanjali Gajanan Tendulkar v. Gajanan Dinkar Tendulkar (1989), granted interim maintenance primarily to the wife, Gitanjali, despite discussions involving her son Gitanjali Gajanan Tendulkar VS Gajanan Dinkar Tendulkar - Bombay, Shivaji s/o Baburao Bhabad @ Bhawad VS Sau. Alka w/o Shivaji Bhabad @ Bhawad - Bombay.
-
Legal Reasoning - The court took a broad view of maintenance obligations, referencing a previous case where a major son was awarded maintenance, but in this case, the focus was on the wife’s entitlement Gitanjali Gajanan Tendulkar VS Gajanan Dinkar Tendulkar - Bombay, Husband VS Wife - Bombay.
-
Key Insight - The case illustrates how courts interpret maintenance claims, emphasizing the primary support to the wife and the limited or no maintenance awarded to adult children, depending on circumstances Shivaji s/o Baburao Bhabad @ Bhawad VS Sau. Alka w/o Shivaji Bhabad @ Bhawad - Bombay.
-
Conclusion - The case of Gitanjali Gajanan Tendulkar underscores the legal stance that maintenance is generally awarded to the wife, with specific judgments varying based on facts; the 1989 decision highlights judicial discretion in maintenance matters SHIVAJI BABURAO BHABAD ALIAS BHAWAD AND ANR vs ALKA SHIVAJI BHABAD ALIAS BHAWAD AND ANR - Bombay.
Search Results for "Gitanjali Gajanan Tendulkar"
1988 0 Supreme(Bom) 305 • India - Bombay
H.SURESH
1992 0 Supreme(Bom) 30 • India - Bombay
S.W.PURANIK, N.D.VYAS
Shri Angal, lastly, cited a decision in (Gitanjali Gajanan Tendulkar v. ... Gajanan Dinkar Tendulkar)7, reported in 1989(1) Bom.C.R. 334, in which the learned Single Judge of this Court had, without reference to section 26 of the Act, taken a very broad view and had granted interim maintenance to a son who was already a major.
• India - Bombay High Court - Bench at Aurangabad
The Bombay High Court in the case of Gitanjali Gajanan Tendulkar Vs. ... Gajanan Dinkar Tendulkar, 1989 (1) Bom.C.R.334 held that if a son reaches p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding
2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 67 • India - Bombay
P.R.BORKAR
The learned Judge relied upon the case of Geetanjali Gajanan Tendulkar V. Gajanan Dinkar Tendulkar (1989 [1] Bombay Cases Reporter 334. ... 7. Heard counsel for both sides. ... 8. ... It is also clear from the final order passed that the maintenance was awarded only to wife Gitanjali.
• India - Bombay High Court - Bench at Aurangabad
Gajanan Dinkar Tendulkar (1989 [1] Bombay Cases Reporter 334. ... The learned Judge relied upon the case of Geetanjali Gajanan Tendulkar ... It is also clear from the final order passed that the maintenance was awarded only to wife Gitanjali.
Filter by Legal Phrase
