Has the Decision in 2000 1 KLT 197 Been Overruled?
Decision in 2000 (1) KLT 197 (Infant Jesus Church, Ernakulam) was a judgment that held that the exemption under Section 25(1) of Act 2 of 1965 applied to all minorities, and the respondent was not entitled to exemption in that case. The decision was significant in interpreting the scope of exemptions under the Act.
P I SIMON SO ITTOOP vs ANTONY SO LATE LASERKUTTY -DO - Kerala
Overruling of the 2000 (1) KLT 197 Decision:
The decision in Krishna Pillai v. Infant Jesus Church (2000 (1) KLT 197) was explicitly overruled by a Division Bench of this Court in 2009. The court held that the exemption under Section 25(1) of Act 2 of 1965 is available even for buildings constructed by the minority community, contrary to the earlier decision. This indicates a clear judicial overruling of the 2000 (1) KLT 197 judgment.
CHANDRASEKHARAN vs CHERIYAN FRANCISSO NALLENKARA CHERIYAN - Kerala
Implication:
The 2000 (1) KLT 197 decision is not good law anymore, as it was overruled by the 2009 Division Bench decision. The overruling clarifies the legal position regarding exemptions under Section 25(1) and establishes that the earlier judgment does not hold authority post-2009.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The decision in 2000 (1) KLT 197 (Infant Jesus Church case) has been overruled by a subsequent Division Bench decision in 2009. Therefore, the legal position has changed, and the exemption under Section 25(1) of Act 2 of 1965 is now interpreted to apply more broadly, including to buildings constructed by minorities, as per the later ruling. The earlier judgment is no longer binding law.
References:
Final Decision: The proceedings against the petitioner were quashed due to the absence of necessary sanction under Section ... 197 Cr.P.C. ... Section 197 Cr.P.C., thereby quashing the proceedings as the petitioner was performing his official duties. ... In as much as the decision in K.M. Mathew v. State of Kerala (1992 (1) KLT 1) stands overruled by the decision in Adalath Prasad v. R ooplal Jindal & ors. ... Section 197....
Joint Registrar (2000 (1) KLT 730 FB) and took the view that the decision in Hassan's case will operate ... prospectively from the date of the decision and not retrospectively –Held, High Court has no power of prospective overruling. ... Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (1998 (2) KLT 746 FB Administrator appointed under S.33 of the ... Joint Registrar (2000 (1) KLT 730 FB) and took the view that the decision#HL_....
Final Decision: The Second Appeal is allowed, restoring the trial court's decree for eviction. ... Eviction - Civil Suit - Act 2 of 1965 - Sections 25(1) - The court interpreted Sections related to eviction, establishing that ... Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court established that exemptions under Section 25(1) of Act 2 of 1965 apply to all minority ... Infant Jesus Church, Ernakulam (2000 (1) KLT 197) held that exemption provided under Section 25 (1#HL_E....
Final Decision: The Second Appeal is dismissed, granting the appellant three months to vacate the shop room. ... But that suit was dismissed in view of the Division Bench decision of this Court in Krishna Pillai v. Infant Jesus Church (2000 (1) KLT 197) holding that respondent is not entitled to the exemption under Section 25 of Act 2 of 1965. ... John Ancheril referred supra overruled that decision and held that the exemption is available for buil....
legitimate claim to Muthawalliship based on historical documents and previous judgments, and the objection regarding maintainability was overruled ... The Tribunal's findings were based on established legal principles and previous court decisions. ... (Paras 1, 9, 15) ... ... (B) Jurisdiction - Tribunal's jurisdiction to entertain ... This decision bars the claim of the defense as resjudicata. 27. ... Today it is submitted from either side that the suit on hand is covered by the decision of the Apex c....
The Legislature may, in certain cases, overrule or nullify the judicial or executive decision by enacting an appropriate legislation ... But the Government would be bound by the ultimate decision of the Tribunal. ... that decision would be final and binding so far as the Executive and the Government is concerned. ... Thus, Section 6(1) is a travesty of the rule of law which is one of the basic structures of the Constitution. The Legislature may, in certain cases, overrule or nullify th....
judgment - Held, Facts and circumstances of case obtaining in case that came up for consideration before Delhi High Court in above decision ... made by Delhi High Court in the reported case have absolutely no bearing to facts and circumstances of this case - Therefore above decision ... That notification is struck down by a Division Bench of this Court in the decision in Krishna Pillai v. Infant Jesus Church (2000 (1) KLT 197) holding that the notification is unconsti....
State Bank of Sikkim, AIR 2007 SC 1812, the decision of a Full Bench of this Court in Naik Nakul Deb Singh v. Deputy Commandant, 2000 Lab. I.C. 464 and the recent decision of a learned single Judge of this Court in M/s.Asten Mather Realtors Pvt. ... Deputy Commandant (C.I.S.F.Unit) Kottayam and Others, 2000 Lab.I.C 464 and the recent decision of a learned single Judge of this Court in M/s. Asten Mather Realtors P. Ltd. v. M/s.Mather & CO. P. ... Relying on the decision of the Apex Cou....
afore order, has noted that afore view taken by learned Single Judge is that, in light of judgment of Apex Court in case supra, decision ... action of dismissal has been rendered in breach of statutory mandate, does not reflect correct legal position and same will stand overruled ... Maharashtra State Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 – Section 91 – Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 – Section 69, 70(3), 70 (1) ... Tyagi's case supra and Indian Airlines Corporation's case supra, stand overruled by the Constitution Be....
Beni I.L.R (1938) ALL 750 : (AIR 1938 ALL 386 : 39 Cri LJ 720 (F.B.)) overruled the earlier Allahabad case and followed the decision in the Madras case as well as in Bhiku Khan v. Zahuran, 25 Cal.291, Emperor v. Sardar Muhammad, AIR 1935 Lah 758 : (37 Cri LJ 207) and Emperor v. ... Amjad Ali [2000(1) KLT 696 (SC)] : (1999 AIR SCW 4880), it was contended that irrespective of the number of defaults that are committed in paying each month maintenance, in section 125(3) there is a cap of one month on the to....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.