AI Overview...
- Hukum Chand Garg - Legal Proceedings and Case References
-
Multiple references indicate Hukum Chand Garg's involvement in various legal cases, including criminal and property disputes. Notably, in the case of Hukum Chand Garg & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (SPL (Crl.) No. 762/2020), the Supreme Court held that a person not named in the ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report) has no locus standi to seek relief such as quashing the ECIR AMIT KATYAL vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT - Delhi, Amit Katyal VS Directorate of Enforcement - Delhi, Moloy Ghatak VS Directorate of Enforcement - Delhi.
-
Property and Ownership Issues
-
The case involving Pushpa Bai's death led to Hukum Chand Garg being impleaded as her legal representative. The registered sale deed from 1960 suggests that the property was co-owned by Kapoor Chand and his sons, indicating joint ownership of the disputed property Pushpa (Smt. ) (Dead) through Legal Representative Hukum Chand Garg VS Vishnu Kumar - Madhya Pradesh.
-
Court Rulings and Legal Principles
-
The Supreme Court's decision in Hukum Chand Garg emphasizes that only individuals named in the ECIR can challenge or seek relief related to it, which impacts the legal standing of Hukum Chand Garg in certain proceedings AMIT KATYAL vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT - Delhi, Amit Katyal VS Directorate of Enforcement - Delhi, Moloy Ghatak VS Directorate of Enforcement - Delhi.
-
Additional Context
- The references also include discussions on property transactions, ownership, and the legal status of properties associated with Hukum Chand Garg, highlighting his involvement in property and criminal cases.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Hukum Chand Garg is a figure involved in various legal cases, primarily related to property disputes and criminal proceedings. The Supreme Court's rulings confirm that his legal standing in certain cases, especially those involving ECIRs, is limited to individuals explicitly named in the reports. His involvement in property transactions and legal representations indicates a significant role in property and criminal law contexts.
Search Results for "Hukum Chand Garg"
2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1748 • India - Supreme Court
A. M. KHANWILKAR, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
2021 0 Supreme(MP) 210 • India - Madhya Pradesh
S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Pushpa Bai expired, as a result, the present petitioner Hukum Chand Garg was impleaded as legal representative of deceased Pushpa Bai. ... Hence, the registered sale deed itself shows that the purchaser was not Kapoor Chand alone, but also his sons as co-owners. Hence, prima facie, it seems that the sons of Kapoor Chand are also coowners of the property in dispute. ... Before adverting to the question involved in this case, it may be noted that in the registered sale deed dated 12.8.1960 the shop in dis....
• India - Supreme Court
No(s). 762/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-01-2020 in MB No. 220/2020 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) HUKUM CHAND GARG &
2021 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1303 • India - High Court of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13113 • India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench)
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
However, in view of the observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hukum Chand Garg (supra) as well as Rajkumar Sansi Vs. ... He relies on the order Hukum Chand Garg and Anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.: 2022 SCC Online 2165, it would be apposite to quote the short order passed by the Supreme Court: "1. ... Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5353/2022 Shanti Dhariwal S/o Late Shri Rikhabh Chand Dhariwal ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raja....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2901 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Purnima Garg, plaintiff who was the daughter of Mr. Sumer Chand, real brother of Mr. Hukum Chand Gupta, asserted she was residing at H-20, First Floor, Shakarpur, Delhi, which was a few houses away from the Suit Property. She was invited by Smt. ... Hukum Chand Gupta had died without child. House No. 96A, Block-H, Shakarpur, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the „Suit Property‟), comprised of a Ground Floor and First Floor. ... Hukum Chand Gupta on 0....
2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 18531 • India - High Court of Delhi
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
Chand Garg & Ors. v. ... In this regard, reliance is placed on the decision in case of Hukum Chand Garg & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. SPL (Crl.) No. 762/2020 to argue that a person who is not named in the ECIR has no locus to seek relief such as quashing of ECIR. ... course of arguments, one of the contentions raised by the learned Special Counsel for Directorate of Enforcement was also that ‗a person who is named in the ECIR cannot seek its quashing‘, and in this regard, the attention of thi....
2007 0 Supreme(Del) 1089 • India - Delhi
S.RAVINDRA BHAT
Accused Hukum Chand Garg had clearly given a wrong report intentionally. D-94 is the Stock Register of M/s Shri ram Polychem showing the transactions with M/s Kanika Chemicals and M/s IP Enterprises. In this context, statement of PW-18 balvinder Singh is relevant. ... The legal Search report D-70 submitted by A-6 Hukum chang Garg categorically states that the property is in the name of Swaran lata, whereas the perpetual lease deed shows that this is a free hold property in the name of Sh.
2023 0 Supreme(Del) 5359 • India - Delhi
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Chand Garg & Ors. v. ... In this regard, reliance is placed on the decision in case of Hukum Chand Garg & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. SPL (Crl.) No. 762/2020 to argue that a person who is not named in the ECIR has no locus to seek relief such as quashing of ECIR. ... course of arguments, one of the contentions raised by the learned Special Counsel for Directorate of Enforcement was also that `a person who is named in the ECIR cannot seek its quashing`, and in this regard, the attention of this....
2023 0 Supreme(Del) 5583 • India - Delhi
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
This Court has also considered the decision of Hon`ble Apex Court in case of Hukum Chand Garg & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., SLP(Crl.) No. 762/2020 in which it was held that a person who is named in the ECIR cannot seek its quashing.
Filter by Legal Phrase
