AI Overview...
- Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Industry - Legal and Regulatory Framework
-
The industry is subject to various legal documents, including the Companies Act, 2013, requiring compliance and undertakings related to objections from authorities such as the Regional Director (SER), MCA, and the Official Liquidator. It involves manufacturing activities like cement plants, mining equipment, and related materials. M/s.Jajpur Cements Private Limited vs M/s.Sagar Cements Limited - National Company Law Tribunal
-
Taxation and Exemptions
-
The industry benefits from tax exemptions under the State Government's notifications (Section 8(3) of Act, 1994), specifically on asbestos cement sheets and bricks manufactured within the state, provided certain conditions like commencement of commercial production by 2001 are met. Hyderabad Industries Ltd. VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan
-
Legal Cases and Court Judgments
-
Several Supreme Court and High Court cases have addressed issues related to the Hyderabad Asbestos Cement industry, including tax disputes (e.g., Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd. vs. State of Andhra Pradesh), labor disputes (dismissal of workers), and compliance with statutory obligations. These cases highlight the industry's legal challenges and compliance requirements. Indian Oil Corporation Limited VS Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Special Circle, Rajasthan, Jaipur - Rajasthan, Khan Bahadur Ahmed Alladin and SOBS, Secunderabad VS Commissioner of Income Tax, A. P. , Hyderabad - Andhra Pradesh
-
Company Structure and Ownership
-
Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd. was managed by Alladin and Co., which acted as the managing agent for multiple companies including Hyderabad Laminated Products Ltd. and Hyderabad Allwyn Metal Works Ltd., indicating a complex corporate structure involved in the industry’s operations. Khan Bahadur Ahmed Alladin And Sons VS Commissioner Of Income-tax, A. P. - Supreme Court
-
Industry Operations and Shifts
-
There are records of industry activity shifts, such as the relocation of the asbestos cement industry and the discontinuation of certain activities like dyeing and printing, possibly due to legal, environmental, or economic factors. Reports and investigations have been conducted to assess such changes. Jayram Karsan Tank VS Deputy Regional Director - Bombay, Indian Oil Corporation Limited VS Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Special Circle, Rajasthan, Jaipur - Rajasthan
-
Government Policies and Industry Support
-
The government has issued notifications and schemes supporting the industry, including contributions to social schemes and exemptions, but also emphasizing compliance with conditions like raw material usage (e.g., fly ash content) and production timelines. Hyderabad Industries Ltd. VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Khan Bahadur Ahmed Alladin and SOBS, Secunderabad VS Commissioner of Income Tax, A. P. , Hyderabad - Andhra Pradesh
-
Judicial and Regulatory Oversight
- The industry has been under judicial scrutiny concerning tax, labor, and environmental issues, with courts emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and examining legal compliance in various cases. Durga Bhawani Cold Storage VS Bihar State Financial Corporation - Patna
Analysis and Conclusion:
The Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Industry operates within a complex legal framework involving compliance with corporate, tax, labor, and environmental laws. Multiple court rulings have addressed disputes related to taxation, labor dismissals, and operational shifts, reflecting ongoing regulatory oversight. The industry's legal documents and case law underscore the importance of adherence to statutory obligations and government policies for continued operation and legal compliance.
Search Results for "Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Industry Legal Documents"
2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2748 • India - National Company Law Tribunal
Shri. Rajeev Bhardwaj, J, Shri. Sanjay Puri, T
Companies Act, 2013 and submit necessary compliance and undertaking relating to the objections raised by the Regional Director (SER), MCA, Government of India, Hyderabad and Official Liquidator, Hyderabad. ... ii) To fabricate, manufacture and deal in all kinds of cement plants, apparatus, mining equipment, tools, utensils and materials and things necessary or convenient for carrying on the manufacture of cement and mining operations. ... Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and on perusal of the ....
2013 0 Supreme(HP) 740 • India - Himachal Pradesh
V.K.SHARMA
Sales Tax Act, 1975 - Section 30, Section 43 - The judgment discusses the interpretation of clause 8.3 of Section III of the tender document ... M/s Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Production Ltd. and others, (1994) 5 Supreme Court Cases 100 (para 13) and Hon’ble Madras High Court in J.B. Leather Fertilizers and Company vs. Deputy Commercial Tax officer, Vellore (Rural), 2002-(126)-STC-0038-MAD (W.P. Nos.9905 and W.M.P. ... Accordingly, the plaintiff furnished all the necessary documents to the defendant in r....
1964 0 Supreme(AP) 134 • India - Andhra Pradesh
SATYANARAYANA RAJU, VENKATESAM
It purchased the Brengun Factory and properties attached to it in the outskirts of the city of Hyderabad, consisting of 403 acres ... Tribunal on the primary evidentiary facts, but it is open to the High Court to examine whether the Tribunal had applied the relevant legal ... Alladin and Co. , is the managing agent of several limited liability companies, viz. , Hyderabad Asbestos cement Products Ltd. , (hereinafter referred to as the Asbestos Co.), Hyderabad laminated....
1971 0 Supreme(AP) 201 • India - Andhra Pradesh
VAIDYA
The question referred to the labour Court was whether the dismissal of Sri Mohin Ali by the employers of Hyderabad Asbestos Cement ... The case of the 2nd respondent was not taken up by the hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Workers Union, but it seems he independently ... Products Ltd. , Hyderabad is justified. ... The question referred to the labour Court was whether the dismissal of Sri Mohin Ali by the employers of Hyderabad Asbestos#H....
2007 0 Supreme(Raj) 1042 • India - Rajasthan
R.M.LODHA, R.S.CHAUHAN
Act, 1994, Sec. 15 – Exemption from tax – State Govt. issued notification u/S. 8(3) granting exemption from tax on the sale of asbestos ... cement sheets and bricks manufactured in State – Imposed conditions that exemption shall be on the goods manufactured by the dealer ... by weight of such asbestos cement sheets and bricks and provided further that the industrial unit commenced commercial production by 31.12.2001. ... in the State by an industrial unit having fly ash as its main raw material constituting 25% or more i....
1967 0 Supreme(SC) 342 • India - Supreme Court
J.C.SHAH, V.BHARGAVA, V.RAMASWAMI
Alladin and Co. was the managing agent of several joint stocks companies viz., Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Asbestos Co.). Hyderabad Laminated Products Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Laminated Products). ... Hyderabad Allwyn Metal Works Limited (hereinafter referred to as Allwyn Co.) and others. Alladdin and Co., started Asbestos Co., in 1946 and the Laminated Products in 1947. The Government of Hyderabad#H....
1992 0 Supreme(Bom) 137 • India - Bombay
B.U.WAHANE
In a case of (Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd. v. ... In a case of (Royal Talkies, Hyderabad and others v. ... Scheme was applied to our industry since 27-11-1976. We have paid the contribution till 26-11-1977 regularly". ... He further deposed that Shri Baburao Nagorao More was the deputee in accordance with Exh. U-13 certificate issued by the Board. ... ... Besides the above evidence, he proved and exhibited various documents placed on record. In his evidence, he specificall....
2015 0 Supreme(Raj) 219 • India - Rajasthan
J.K.RANKA
In the case of Hyderabad Asbestos Cement ProductsLtd. Vs. ... Moideenkutty (Decd.): (1993) 90 STC 36 (SC);Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd. Vs. State of AndhraPradesh: (1969) 24 STC 487 (SC); Hindustan Sugar Mills Ltd.Vs. State of Raj. & ors.: (1979) 43 STC 13(SC); AssistantCommissioner Vs. ... He also drewattention of this Court to Clause 16.3 of the agreement whichclearly specifies that “the reimbursement of freight will be onactual road freight or the freight rate as per #HL_S....
2013 0 Supreme(AP) 390 • India - Andhra Pradesh
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
12.07.1984 revealed that there was no industrial activity on the part of the petitioner connected to dyeing and printing and that the asbestos cement industry set up by the petitioner was shifted to another place; that a report filed by Advocate-Commissioner appointed in I.A.No.2552 of 1985 in O.S.No ... The petitioner is a partnership firm incorporated with the object of conducting industry in Dyeing and Printing of Cloth and allied activities. In 1936, the then Hyderabad Government had conducted sale ....
2001 0 Supreme(Pat) 893 • India - Patna
SACHCHIDANAND JHA, P.K.SINHA
Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products V/s. Union of India, AIR 2000 SC 314 Durgesh Cold Storage and Ice Factory V/s. U.P. Financial Corporation, AIR 1989 Allahabad 96: (1989 All LJ 834), Bhabagrahi Panigrahi V/s. Union of India, AIR 1990 Orissa 42. ... But this factor cannot be carried to the extent of obligating the Corporation to revive and resurrect every sick industry irrespective of the cost involved. ... So that the documents may be executed in its name. On 7-5-1990 the Corporation allowed the reques....
Filter by Legal Phrase
