AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Arbitrator’s Power to Award Benefits - An arbitrator or umpire has the authority to direct payment of interest from the date of the award on the principal sum awarded, even if the underlying contract is void or invalid. This includes benefits or advantages received under the contract, provided the benefit was received during the contractual period UNION OF INDIA VS BUNGO STEEL FURNITURE (PR. ) LTD. - Calcutta.

  • Validity of Contract and Award Enforcement - If a contract is declared void or illegal under applicable law, the enforceability of awards based on such contracts becomes questionable. Courts have held that awards in respect of illegal contracts may not be enforceable, and the arbitrator’s authority is derived from the contract itself. When the contract is void, the arbitrator's jurisdiction to award benefits or damages under that contract is generally limited or invalidated V. Raghunadba Rao VS State of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh, NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA VS SILICON CERAMICS LIMITED - Delhi.

  • Scope of Arbitrator’s Authority - An arbitrator's authority is confined to the terms of the contract. Acting beyond the scope or disregarding the contractual provisions can render an award in excess of jurisdiction or invalid. For example, claims related to issues explicitly excluded from arbitration or arising from an illegal contract are not within the arbitrator’s jurisdiction Prabhubhai Jadhavji Rathod VS Union of India - Bombay.

  • Impact of Contract Voiding on Benefits - Even if a contract is void, benefits received under it may still be awarded or recognized if they are deemed benefits or advantages received during the period when the contract was valid. However, the enforceability of such awards depends on the legality of the underlying contract and the jurisdiction’s stance on awarding benefits under void contracts UNION OF INDIA VS BUNGO STEEL FURNITURE (PR. ) LTD. - Calcutta.

  • Court’s Role in Arbitration and Void Contracts - Courts have clarified that if a contract is illegal and void, arbitration awards based on such contracts may not be enforceable. Additionally, courts can set aside awards if the arbitrator exceeds jurisdiction or acts contrary to the contractual scope, especially in cases involving illegal or void contracts NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA VS SILICON CERAMICS LIMITED - Delhi.

Analysis and Conclusion:
While arbitrators generally derive their authority from the contract, their ability to award benefits under a void or illegal contract is limited. If the contract is void, the arbitrator cannot award benefits that depend on the validity of the contract. However, benefits received during the period when the contract was valid may still be awarded, provided they do not contravene law. Courts tend to uphold awards only if they are within the scope of the arbitrator’s jurisdiction and based on valid contractual obligations. Therefore, the awarding of benefits under a void contract is typically restricted, and enforcement depends on the legality and jurisdictional rules governing the arbitration.

Search Results for "If Contract is Void can Arbitrator Still Award the Benefit Received under the Contract"

UNION OF INDIA VS BUNGO STEEL FURNITURE (PR. ) LTD.

1962 0 Supreme(Cal) 174 India - Calcutta

R.S.BACHAWAT, K.N.LAL

The arbitrator or the umpire has power to direct payment of interest from the date of the award on the principal sum awarded in cases ... of the contract and in awarding interest from the date of the award. ... ARBITRATION - AWARD - SETTING ASIDE - WRONGFUL CANCELLATION OF CONTRACT - MEASURE OF DAMAGES - INTEREST ON PRINCIPAL SUM AWARDED ... It was a benefit or advantage, it was received, and it was received under the cont....

JOSEPH PYKE AND SON (LIVERPOOL) LTD.  VS KEDARNATH MOHANLAL

1958 0 Supreme(Cal) 147 India - Calcutta

P.B.CHAKRAVARTTI, S.C.LAHIRI

which will be available for the benefit of the buyer, make out an invoice as described by Blackburn J. , in Ireland v. ... ARBITRATION - Award - Filing - Whether an award made in respect of a contract which is illegal under the Indian law can be filed ... ) Order, 1944 - Whether the contract in question is a forward contract within the meaning of the Order - Whether the contract is ... The second arbitrator in the present case must, therefore, be tre....

V.  Raghunadba Rao VS State of A. P.

India - Andhra Pradesh

E.RAMASWAMY

was void. ... the constitutional validity of certain clauses in the Andhra Pradesh Standard Specifications (Specifications) incorporated into a contract ... The contract incorporated the Andhra Pradesh Standard Specifications (Specifications), which contained certain clauses that the petitioner ... Issues arising by such exclusion or limiting liability received stimulation by the use of standard form contracts. ... Undoubtedly, the procedure has been provided under the Arbit-ration Act, 1940, for remova....

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED vs BRITISH MARINE PLC

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7612 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

JYOTI SINGH, J

(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - Challenge to arbitral award - Majority award upheld; termination of Contract ... of Affreightment deemed invalid - Parties are bound by explicit contract terms and unless stipulated conditions for termination ... are met, such termination is void. ... Law is now well settled that an Arbitrator cannot travel beyond the contract to award compensation. ... for its own breach and then be....

Prabhubhai Jadhavji Rathod VS Union of India

2008 0 Supreme(Bom) 323 India - Bombay

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI

arbitrator in respect thereof would be in excess of the jurisdiction. ... -Entrance of reference by the arbitrator on disputes which were excluded from reference and the adjudication thereupon would amount ... Since there was a specific bar to the raising of a claim regarding transit, demurrage and wharfage charges, the award made by the ... It is settled law that arbitrator derives the authority from the contract and if he acts in manifest disregard of the contract the award....

NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA VS SILICON CERAMICS LIMITED

1997 0 Supreme(Del) 496 India - Delhi

A.D.SINGH

had no jurisdiction — Arbitration clause not valid — Arbitrator enlarged scope of reference — Award made Rule of the court with ... Levy of royalty — defaulted — Dispute — Petitioner sought appointment of — Appointed — Made Award — Published — Challenged — Arbitrator ... Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20 — Appointment of Arbitrator — Intervention of court — Rule of the court — Licence Agreement — ... C. 1810, it was held that if a contract is illegal and void, an arb....

B. M. Construction Company VS Union of India through Chief Engineer (Construction)-I, North Western Railway, Jaipur

2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 462 India - Rajasthan

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ

- But price variation for steel and cement has to be calculated as per of Special Conditions of Contract - While respondents have ... Variation in prices of materials other than cement and steel labor fuel explosives has to be determined as per of Special Conditions of Contract ... petitioner remained unused which caused loss to him - Held, Objection of respondent-Railways is that petitioner is entitled to get the benefit ... The petitioner submitted its 44th and final bill to respondents on 17.04.2013 and has received ....

Union of India VS N. K.  Garg & Co.

2015 0 Supreme(Del) 4383 India - Delhi

VALMIKI J.MEHTA

because of the bar of Clause 16(2) of the General Conditions of Contract in question - Clause 16(2) is invalid and void as the same ... is hit by Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act - Petition is dismissed. ... (2) of the GCC is struck down - Held, there is no merit in the objection petition that interest has been wrongly granted by the Arbitrator ... In view of the above, there is no merit in the objection petition that interest has been wrongly granted by the Arbitrator because of the bar of Clause ....

Mcdermott International Inc.  VS Burn Standard Co. LTD.

2006 5 Supreme 662 India - Supreme Court

B.P.SINGH, S.B.SINHA

Act, 1996, Sections 34, 2(e) and 8 -Application under S. 34 of the Act- Arbitrator ... Agreement, MII shall assume towards BSCL all the obligations and responsibilities which BSCL, by such Main Contract, assumes to Buyer and shall have the benefit of all rights, remedies and redresses against BSCL which BSCL, by such Main Contract, has against Buyer, insofar as applicable to this sub-contract ... sub-contract agreement, MII shall assume towards BSCL all the obligations and responsibili....

Sifandros Carrier Ltd.  VS LMJ International Ltd.

2018 0 Supreme(Cal) 615 India - Calcutta

SOUMEN SEN

The Court noted that the award-debtor had received numerous opportunities to participate in the arbitration proceedings, but had ... The Court noted that the award-debtor had received numerous opportunities to participate in the arbitration proceedings, but had ... The Court held that the award-holder was entitled to enforce the foreign award against the award-debtor as the award-debtor had ... two weeks to appoint their arbitrator ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top