AI Overview...
-
Interest Reipublicae ut Sit Finis Litium - The legal maxim emphasizes that there should be a limit to litigation to promote public welfare and prevent endless legal disputes. It underscores the importance of finality in legal proceedings for societal stability. Multiple sources highlight that this principle forms the basis for limitation laws, advocating that litigation should have a finite period to serve the public interest. Daljit Singh VS Satish Randhawa - Punjab and Haryana, Dev Raj VS Parkash Ram - Punjab and Haryana, Pilli Apparao, S/o. Appala Naidu VS Thammina Ramarao, S/o. late Ramakrishnaiah - Andhra Pradesh, Dinesh Parmar VS Usha Sharma - Current Civil Cases, State of Jharkhand vs Usha Sharma - Jharkhand, Lachinder Mandavi S/o Late Maharu VS Shankar S/o Late Lalsai Mandavi - Chhattisgarh, Kartha of HUF Subramaniam VS Karuppanna Gounder & Another - Madras, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs MRS NIRUPMA SINGH & ANR - Consumer National, Chinnammal & Others VS K. Palani Ammal & Another - Madras, Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. VS Allu Nookaratnam - Andhra Pradesh
-
Application in Law - The maxim is invoked to justify strict adherence to limitation periods, asserting that extending time due to hardships or delays undermines legal certainty and public policy. Courts emphasize that while flexibility may be considered for condonation of delay, the overarching goal remains to prevent indefinite litigation. The principle also supports the notion that the law aids vigilant parties and discourages negligence. Daljit Singh VS Satish Randhawa - Punjab and Haryana, Pilli Apparao, S/o. Appala Naidu VS Thammina Ramarao, S/o. late Ramakrishnaiah - Andhra Pradesh, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs MRS NIRUPMA SINGH & ANR - Consumer National, Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. VS Allu Nookaratnam - Andhra Pradesh
-
Judicial Discretion and Public Policy - While the law recognizes the need for a liberal approach in certain cases, the ultimate aim is to uphold the public interest by ensuring timely resolution of disputes. Courts balance compassion with the necessity to uphold limitation statutes, often emphasizing that hardship alone is insufficient to extend limitation periods. Daljit Singh VS Satish Randhawa - Punjab and Haryana, Kartha of HUF Subramaniam VS Karuppanna Gounder & Another - Madras, Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. VS Allu Nookaratnam - Andhra Pradesh
-
Conclusion - The principle of Interest Reipublicae ut Sit Finis Litium serves as a foundational doctrine advocating for the finality of litigation to promote societal order and efficiency. It underscores that limitation laws are rooted in public policy, and any extension must be carefully justified, maintaining the balance between individual rights and the collective good. Strict adherence to limitation periods is essential, although judicial discretion can be exercised within the framework of public interest.
Search Results for "Interest Reipublicae up Sit Finis Litium"
2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 4463 • India - Punjab and Haryana
JASPAL SINGH
Reipublicae Ut Sit Finis Litium'. ... Reipublicae Ut Sit Finis Litium' and the need for a liberal approach in considering applications for condonation of delay. ... Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 - The court discussed the application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, emphasizing the legal maxim 'Interest ... The law of limitation is enshrined in the legal maxim "Interest Reipublicae Ut #HL_STAR....
2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 269 • India - Punjab and Haryana
SANJAY VASHISTH
reipublicae ut sit finis litium' which means that there should be a limit to the litigation. ... (Civil) 452 - The court discussed the violation of the decree, the applicability of Order 21 Rule 32 CPC, and the principle of 'interest ... Thus, this Court is of the view that this observation made by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court is in consonance with the principle “interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium” wh....
2022 0 Supreme(AP) 420 • India - Andhra Pradesh
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
reipublicae ut sit finis litium (it is for general welfare that a period be put to litigation) – Idea is that every legal remedy ... in filing petition to set aside exparte decree – Held, Law of limitation is founded on public policy – It is enshrined in maxim interest ... It is enshrined in the maxim interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (it is for the general welfare that a period be put to litigation). The id....
• India - Current Civil Cases
P.K.LOHRA
reipublicae ut sit finis litium (it is for general welfare that a period be put to litigation) — Idea is that every legal remedy ... lead to unending uncertainty and consequential anarchy — Law of limitation thus founded on public policy — It enshrined in maxim interest ... It is enshrined in the maxim interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (it is for the general welfare that a period be put to litigation). The i....
2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1437 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
... ... (B) Legal maxim 'interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium' is acknowledged, asserting the necessity of limitation laws (Para ... It requires to refer herein that the Law of limitation is enshrined in the legal maxim interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (it is for the general welfare that a period be put to litigation). ... We have also recorded the irony of the situation where no action is taken again....
2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 139 • India - Chhattisgarh
SANJAY S. AGRAWAL
reipublicae up sit finis litium (it is for the general welfare that a period be put to litigation). ... appeal is preferred by an inordinate delay - Held, law of limitation is thus founded on public policy - It is enshrined in the maxim interest ... It is enshrined in the maxim interest reipublicae up sit finis litium (it is for the general welfare that a period be put to litigation). Rules of limitation are not me....
2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 252 • India - Madras
G.RAJASURIA
reipublicae ut sit finis litium' (in the interest of public there should be an end to litigation). ... non dormientibus jura subveniunt' (the law assists those who are vigilant, not those who sleep on their rights) and the maxim 'Interest ... My mind is reminiscent and redolent of the maxim Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium, which means, in the interest of public there sho....
2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 3430 • India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
MRS. JUSTICE SAROJ YADAV, PRESIDING MEMBER
Reipublicae Ut Sit Finis Litium’ emphasized - Hardship to a party not sufficient ground to extend limitation period. ... 10, 11) ... ... (B) Law of Limitation - Statutory provisions to be strictly adhered to - The principle of ‘Interest ... The law of limitation is enshrined in the legal maxim “Interest Reipublicae Ut Sit FinisLitium” (it is for the general welfare that a period be put to litigation).
2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 471 • India - Madras
G.RAJASURIA
Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium - It concerns the state that there be an end of law suit. ... reipublicae ut sit finis litium - It concerns the state that there be an end of law suit. ... without filing written statement with petition as contemplated under law and allowed grass grow under their feet, in addition to having attracted as against them the maxims Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt -The laws aid tho....
2022 0 Supreme(AP) 901 • India - Andhra Pradesh
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
REIPUBLICAE UT SIT FINIS LITIUM - VIGILANTIBUS NON DORMENTIBUS JURA SUBVENINET. ... FILING APPEAL - CONDONATION - INORDINATE DELAY - SUFFICIENT CAUSE - LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION - JUDICIAL DISCRETION - PUBLIC POLICY - INTEREST ... The principle is based on the maxim "interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium", that is, the interest of the State requires that there should be end to litigation but at the ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
