AI Overview...
-
Fraud as a Ground for Challenging Arbitration Awards - The Supreme Court upheld that a suit challenging an arbitration award on the ground of fraud was maintainable under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Justice Bachawat, along with Das Gupta J., recognized that allegations of fraud could be a valid reason to set aside an award, emphasizing the importance of substantive justice over strict procedural rules. Mahamad Ali & Ors. VS Lokman Ali & Ors. - Gauhati
-
Fraud in Settlement and Property Rights - Justice Bachawat dealt with cases involving alleged fraud in settlement agreements and property rights. In AIR 1938 Mad. 307, he highlighted that terms of settlement must create rights in praesenti and that fraud can vitiate such agreements if proven. The courts have shown willingness to scrutinize settlement terms where fraud is alleged, provided the claim is within the limitation period. RAJ KUMAR RAWALA VS MANABENDRA BANERJEE - Calcutta
-
Jurisdiction and Fraud in Court Proceedings - Justice Bachawat emphasized that courts possess inherent powers under Section 151 to correct mistakes and prevent fraud upon the court, including collusion. He acknowledged that fraud, especially when it involves court processes, can nullify orders and warrants the exercise of inherent jurisdiction to ensure justice. CHHITU VS MATHURALAL - Madhya Pradesh
-
Consent and Fraud - In AIR 1963 SC 928, Justice Bachawat discussed that consent obtained through coercion, undue influence, or fraud is not considered free. He underscored that fraud vitiates consent, which is fundamental in contractual and legal settings. Andhra Sugars LTD. VS State Of A. P. - Supreme Court
-
Delay and Substantial Justice - Justice Bachawat, along with Mitter J., held that the term ‘sufficient cause’ in Section 5 of the Limitation Act should be interpreted liberally to serve substantial justice, especially in cases involving allegations of fraud. Delays in challenging fraudulent acts should not bar justice if the cause is genuine. Amaravathy Cranes and Structurals Ltd. , rep by its Director Y. Padmanabha Prasad VS District Collector, Trivellore District - Madras, Amaravathy Cranes and Structurals Ltd. VS District Collector, Trivellore District - Madras
-
Fraud in Corporate Investigations - Justice Bachawat described investigations under Section 237(b) of the Companies Act as sensitive, especially when fraud or misfeasance is suspected. He noted that courts cannot substitute their judgment for that of the authorities and must rely on evidence and reports, such as those by the Court of Inquiry or government reports. NEW CENTRAL JUTE MILLS CO LTD VS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, Deptt. OF REVENUE AND COMPANY LAW, Government OF INDIA - Calcutta, NEW CENTRAL JUTE MILLS CO. LTD. VS DY. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPT. OF REVENUE AND COMPANY LAW, GOVT. OF INDIA - Calcutta
-
Judicial Discretion and Fraud - Throughout his judgments, Justice Bachawat emphasized that courts have the discretion to exercise inherent powers to prevent injustice caused by fraud, including setting aside decrees or orders if fraud is established, even if procedural timelines have lapsed. MEHTA SURAYA VS UNITED INVESTMENT CORPORATION - Calcutta
Analysis and Conclusion: Justice Bachawat’s rulings consistently underscored the primacy of substantive justice over procedural formalities, especially in cases involving fraud. He recognized that fraud undermines the integrity of legal processes and warrants the exercise of inherent jurisdiction to rectify such injustices. His jurisprudence affirms that allegations of fraud are a serious matter, and courts must be vigilant to prevent fraud from defeating genuine claims or corrupting judicial processes.
References: - Mahamad Ali & Ors. VS Lokman Ali & Ors. - Gauhati - RAJ KUMAR RAWALA VS MANABENDRA BANERJEE - Calcutta - CHHITU VS MATHURALAL - Madhya Pradesh - Andhra Sugars LTD. VS State Of A. P. - Supreme Court - Amaravathy Cranes and Structurals Ltd. , rep by its Director Y. Padmanabha Prasad VS District Collector, Trivellore District - Madras - Amaravathy Cranes and Structurals Ltd. VS District Collector, Trivellore District - Madras - CEEAN INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED VS ASHOK SURANA - Calcutta - NEW CENTRAL JUTE MILLS CO LTD VS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, Deptt. OF REVENUE AND COMPANY LAW, Government OF INDIA - Calcutta - NEW CENTRAL JUTE MILLS CO. LTD. VS DY. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPT. OF REVENUE AND COMPANY LAW, GOVT. OF INDIA - Calcutta - MEHTA SURAYA VS UNITED INVESTMENT CORPORATION - Calcutta
Search Results for "Justice Bachawat 1963 Fraud"
1981 0 Supreme(Gau) 148 • India - Gauhati
B.L.HANSARIA
the suit was maintainable under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, as the challenge to the award was based on the ground of fraud ... Das Gupta and Bachawat, JJ. however differed. ... Here is an illustration of a technical rule throttling substantial justice. But this too, cannot defeat justice fully as in the suit the validity of the Sulenama as well was challenged and the same had been done well within the period of limitation. ... Ramchandra, AIR 1963 AP 8. Similar view was taken in Ajmer Trade....
2003 0 Supreme(Cal) 658 • India - Calcutta
KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
Fact of the Case: Petitioner sought to set aside an order and decree passed by the High Court of Calcutta, alleging fraud ... Bachawat reported in AIR 1938 Mad. 307 (Pandivi Satyanandam v. ... Bachawat he has submitted that the terms of settlement did not create any right in praesenti in the property. ... Justice Babulal Jain as "new Motion" on 5th May, 1993 and an order of injunction was passed restraining both the parties from creating any tenancy or-inducting any party or for parting with possession of any portion of....
1979 0 Supreme(MP) 198 • India - Madhya Pradesh
U.N.BHACHAWAT
- REMEDY - SUIT - INHERENT POWERS OF COURT - JURISDICTION TO CORRECT OWN MISTAKE - NATURAL JUSTICE - AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM - WRONG ... ORDER 41 RULE 3A - LIMITATION - CONDONATION OF DELAY - JURISDICTION - INHERENT POWERS - SECTION 151 - NULLITY - FUNCTUS OFFICIO - FRAUD ... WITHOUT REMEDY - UBI JUS IBI REMEDIUM - FRAUD UPON COURT - COLLUSION - DISTINCTION - MINOR - GUARDIAN AD LITEM - NOTICE - ADVERSE ... Singh, Chief Justice, High Court of Madhya Pradesh:- ... "a review of the relevant authorities on the point leads to th....
1967 0 Supreme(SC) 284 • India - Supreme Court
K.N.WANCHOO, K.S.HEGDE, R.S.BACHAWAT, V.RAMASWAMI, G.L.MITTAL
BACHAWAT, J. ... The Lord Justices gave separate opinions. It is worthwhile quoting the opinion of Donovan, L. ... State of Madras, l963 Supp (2) SCR 435 = (AIR 1963 SC 928 ). ... Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake as defined in Sections 15 to 22. ... Commissioner of Sales Tax, Bihar, (1963) Supp (2) SCR 459 at p. 499: (AIR 1963 SC 1207 at p. 1222), the Court by a majority held that the supply of sugar by a....
2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013 • India - Madras
K.CHANDRU
Bachawat and Mitter, JJ. opined that the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of delay. ... 47. ... The expression ‘sufficient cause’ as appearing in Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (in short ‘the Limitation Act’) must receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice as was noted by this Court in G. Ramegowda v. Special Land Acquisition Officer8. ... When substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice ....
2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1019 • India - Madras
K.CHANDRU
First of all, with reference to subordinate officers, a time limit has been prescribed by an amendment to the Inam Abolition Rules, 1963 ... First of all, with reference to subordinate officers, a time limit has been prescribed by an amendment to the Inam Abolition Rules, 1963 ... Bachawat and Mitter, JJ. opined that the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of delay. ... 47. ... The expression ‘sufficient cause’ as appearing in Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (in short ‘the Limitation Act’) must receive....
2002 0 Supreme(Cal) 570 • India - Calcutta
D.K.SETH, JYOTESH BANERJEE
In 1963, LIC filed a mortgage suit being the Title Suit No. 53 of 1963 before the subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Alipore for realisation ... It is a rule of essential justice. ... Bachawat. Mr. Bachawat had relied upon the decision in A. E. G. Carapiet v. A. Y. ... Bachawat had relied on Vidhyadhar v. Mankikrao and Anr. , AIR 1999 SC 1441. ... Bachawat, copies whereof are already furnished to him, are admitted into evidence in F. A. No. 13 of 2000. ... Bachaw....
1969 0 Supreme(Cal) 58 • India - Calcutta
DEEP NARAYAN SINHA, B.C.MISRA
COMPANIES ACT - Investigation - Order under Section 237(b) - Circumstances suggesting fraud, misfeasance or misconduct - Opinion ... Justice Vivian Bose of the Supreme Court of India, which in its report dated 15. 6. 62 made adverse findings and observations against Shri S. P. Jain. ... Bachawat, J. described it as a "border line case. " He held that the Court had no power to review the facts as an appellant body nor could it substitute its opinion for that of the Government. ... ... ( 11 ) ON the relevant point, Bachawat#HL_EN....
1969 0 Supreme(Cal) 59 • India - Calcutta
D.N.SINHA, B.C.MITRA
COMPANIES ACT - Investigation - Section 237(b) - Circumstances suggesting fraud, misfeasance or misconduct - Opinion of Central ... Justice Vivian Bose of the Supreme Court of India, which in its report dated 15-6-62 made adverse findings and observations against Shri S. P. Jain. ... Bachawat, J. described it as a "border line case. " He held that the Court had no power to review the facts as an appellate body, nor could it substitute its opinion for that of the Government. ... ... ( 11 ) ON the relevant point, Bachawat....
2002 0 Supreme(Cal) 71 • India - Calcutta
D.K.SETH
Inasmuch as, even if it is for the ends of justice, such ends of justice is not only in favour of the decree-holder but also the judgment-debtor. ... ... ( 24 ) ENDS of justice: be that as it may, even then it has to be exercised for the ends of justice. Can it be said, that the plaint and the application for decree on admission were amended for the ends of justice! ... Bachawat also relates to the merit of the case and as such it may not be necessary for us to deal with the same at t....
Filter by Legal Phrase
