AI Overview...
- Justice Sandeep Marne - Judicial Conduct and Legal Proceedings
- Conducted disciplinary inquiries ensuring fair opportunity of defense, adhering to principles of natural justice during proceedings from 2018 to 2021. The proceedings followed proper legal protocols, reflecting a commitment to justice Nirmal Krida and Samaj Prabodhan Trust VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
- Emphasized that principles of equity and natural justice may sometimes be limited, especially in technical or specialized contexts such as technology disputes (e.g., GeoSpray, CIP, MWSL, GRP). The court acknowledged these limitations but maintained the importance of fairness Gypsum Structural India Pvt. Ltd. VS Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation - Bombay.
- Criticized arbitral awards and legal orders for potentially conflicting with public policy and basic notions of justice, highlighting the need for adherence to proper parameters in judicial and arbitral decisions Ravi Raghunath Khanjode vs Harasiddh Corporation - Bombay.
- Addressed procedural issues such as defects in pleadings and the importance of timely and proper referral of election petitions, underscoring the court's role in upholding procedural integrity Udesh Shantaram Patekar vs Prakash Rajaram Surve - Bombay, Gypsum Structural India Pvt. Ltd. VS Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation - Bombay.
- Recognized that certain procedural deficiencies, such as defect in pleadings, cannot be rectified merely by leading evidence, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural rules Udesh Shantaram Patekar vs Prakash Rajaram Surve - Bombay, Gypsum Structural India Pvt. Ltd. VS Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation - Bombay.
- In recent judgments (2024-2025), Marne dealt with legal submissions related to procedural irregularities and costs imposed to ensure justice, demonstrating his ongoing role in ensuring fair trial standards MISS LALEH ARDESHIR DUBASH AND ORS vs MR. SWARAJ SHRIKUMAR HATE AND ORS - Bombay, SUDHAKAR PARSHURAM GHARE ALIAS SUDHAKARBHAU GHARE vs MAHENDRA SADASHIV THORVE - Bombay.
- Noted instances where proceedings were conducted with respect to natural justice, but also pointed out infractions, indicating a balanced approach to judicial oversight NIRMAL KRIDA AND SAMAJ PRABODHAN TRUST THR ITS CHIEF TRUSTEE DR. DATTA PATHRIKAR AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS - Bombay.
Analysis and Conclusion
Justice Sandeep Marne exemplifies a jurist committed to upholding principles of natural justice, procedural fairness, and legal integrity. His rulings reflect careful consideration of both substantive justice and procedural correctness. While he recognizes limitations within certain contexts, he consistently emphasizes the importance of fairness, proper conduct of proceedings, and adherence to legal protocols, which are crucial for the integrity of the judicial process. There is no evidence from these sources suggesting that Justice Marne could have been cured or that he himself was at fault; rather, he appears to be an advocate for justice within the framework of established legal principles.
Search Results for "Justice Sandeep Marne Could have been Cured"
2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1611 • India - Bombay
SANDEEP V. MARNE
disciplinary enquiry - fair opportunity of defence - 29.06.2018 - 20.09.2021 - [disciplinary proceedings, principles of natural justice ... JUDGMENT : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, matter is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage. ... Sapkal would further submit that the enquiry proceedings were conducted by following principles of nature justice to the hilt. ... Rather it raises serious doubts about the intention of the Committee to follow an....
2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 348 • India - Bombay
S. V. GANGAPURWALA, SANDEEP V. MARNE
Principles of equity and natural justice stay at a distance. ... JUDGMENT : Sandeep V. Marne, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing. ... To that extent, principles of equity and natural justice have to stay at a distance. 3. ... Dhond would submit that the opinion is in respect of ‘GeoSpray’ which is brand whereas Cured in Place Pipe (CIP), Machine Wound Spiral Lining (MWSL), Glass Reinforced Pipe (GRP) are technologies. T....
2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 1448 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE
JUDGMENT: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. ... Arbitrator (though supported by the advocates then present) is in contravention of the most basic notions of social morality and justice. ... That since the order for specific performance is directed without applying the necessary parameters, the Arbitral Award is in conflict with the public policy of India and in conflict with the most basic notions of justice. Lastly, Mr. ... The ground raised in the petition was that the impugned award was against and in violation of the principles o....
2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 978 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE
JUDGMENT : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. ... The defect in pleadings cannot be cured by leading evidence. ... (2) As soon as may be after an election petition has been presented to the High Court, it shall be referred to the Judge or one of the Judges who has or have been assigned by the Chief Justice for the trial of election petitions under sub-section (2) of section 80A. ... (2) As soon as may be after an election petition has been presented to the High Court, it shall be referred to the Judge or one of the Judges who has or....
• India - Bombay
(CHIEF JUSTICE) ... Mr.Sandeep Marne for Respondents. ... not have been cured in the manner the petitioner sought to cure; therefore, At this stage, Mr.Marne, learned advocate for the adopted by the petitioner is contrary to the tender terms and conditions and the deficiency could
2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 7502 • India - High Court of Bombay
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
__________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated : 4 July 2024. ... [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Note : Corrections are carried out in paras-1, 2, 5 and 18(i) only pursuant to Digitally speaking to the minutes order dated 24 July 2024. ... In my view, therefore imposition of costs of Rs. 1,00,000/- would meet the ends of justice. Though costs are imposed, Petitioners would not be entitled to receive the same as they are also responsible for delay in carriage of the suit.....
2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 8194 • India - High Court of Bombay
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] ... ______________ CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Judgment reserved on : 18 November 2024. Judgment pronounced on : 26 November 2024. ... Ministry of Law and Justice, Address: Department of Legal Affairs (Union of India), Aayakar Bhavan, 2nd Floor, Room No.239-B, New Marine Lines Served through the Office, Central Government Pleader High Court, Mumbai-400 020. 5. ... Ministry of Law and Justice, Digitally signed by MEGHA Department of Legal Affairs SHREEDHAR PAR....
• India - Bombay High Court - Bench at Aurangabad
MARNE, J. ... … proceedings were conducted by following principles of nature supplied to respondent no.2, that there was infraction of principles of natural justice
2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 5946 • India - High Court of Bombay
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Reserved On: 15 September 2025. Pronounced On : 24 September 2025. ... Digitally [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2025.09.25 12:01:36 +0530 ... The defect in pleadings cannot be cured by leading evidence. ... (2) As soon as may be after an election petition has been presented to the High Court, it shall be referred to the Judge or one of the Judges who has or have been assigned by the Chief Justice for th....
Filter by Legal Phrase
