AI Overview

AI Overview...

Search Results for "K Govindarajan Advocate"

K. Jayaramanuju VS Janakaraj and Others

1996 0 Supreme(Mad) 202 India - Madras

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM

Govindarajan, learned Government Advocate appearing for 2nd respondent/State. ... 5.

K. Jayaramanuju VS Janakaraj and Others

1996 0 Supreme(Mad) 194 India - Madras

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM

Govindarajan, learned Government Advocate appearing for 2nd respondent/State. ... 5.

Balakrishnan VS Gopal

2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 746 India - Madras

D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

Fact of the Case: The petitioners filed an interim application for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to determine ... The petitioners/plaintiffs filed I.A.No.509 of 2011 in O.S.No.200 of 2010 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to find out the physical features, relating to 15 feet width of the common pathway, since the same was disputed by the respondent/ defendant in the written statement.

J. S. Agencies VS Namakkal South India Transports

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM

Govindarajan, placing reliance on the decisions in Assistant Collector of Central Excise v. V. ... Govindarajan, the counsel appearing for the petitioners in the revisions and Mr. T. Munirathina Naidu the counsel appearing for the respondent in the revisions and for the petitioner in Cr1. O.P. No. 17795 of 1997. ... 12.

Vijay Dhandapani VS K. Ravi

2007 0 Supreme(Mad) 3379 India - Madras

K.MOHAN RAM

He further submitted that the petitioner has good defence on his side to succeed in the case and he is a practising advocate.

Vijay Dhandapani VS K. Ravi & Others

2007 0 Supreme(Mad) 3376 India - Madras

K.MOHAN RAM

He further submitted that the petitioner has good defence on his side to succeed in the case and he is a practising advocate.

Annasamy Pandian (Died) VS V.  Rajendran

2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 1255 India - Madras

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

J. S. Agencies VS Namakkal South India Transports

India - Crimes

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM

Govindarajan, placing reliance on the decisions in Assistant Collector of Central Excise v. V. ... Govindarajan, the counsel appearing for the petitioners in the revisions and Mr. T. Munirathina Naidu the counsel appearing for the respondent in the revisions and for the petitioner in Cr1. O.P. No. 17795 of 1997. 12.

K. S.  Prem Sagar VS The Idol of Sri Renganathaswamy etc.  Devasthanams, Srirangam, rep.  by its Executive Officer

1993 0 Supreme(Mad) 456 India - Madras

S.M.ALI MOHAMED, MISHRA

K. Jasmine Kirubakani (Respondent) VS K. Balasundaram (Petitioner)

1995 0 Supreme(Mad) 455 India - Madras

RAJU

Govindarajan, Advocate, for the petitioner and of Mr. A. Shanmughavel, for M/s. M. Balasubramanian and V. ... Govindarajan, learned counsel for the petitioner, strenuously contended that the order of the Court below is liable to be set aside in that the same came to be passed contrary to law. ... Meenakshisundaram, Advocate for the respondent, and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court made the following order :- ... The above revision has been filed against the order of the learned District Judge T....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top