Equal Pay for Equal Work - The Supreme Court has considered numerous cases affirming the principle of equal pay for equal work, delivering a landmark judgment that reinforces workers' rights to parity in remuneration based on established legal precedents Ramesh S. Desai VS Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority - Gujarat.
Landmark Judgments Cited in Legal Reasoning - The Court has relied on seminal judgments such as Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (AIR 1980 SC 1632), which discusses constitutional protections, and Bajanlal v. State of Haryana, which emphasizes the correctness of procedures and evidence in criminal cases Jaswinder Singh Jaryal VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, G. Madhusudhan Reddy VS State Of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh.
Application of Landmark Decisions - Courts interpret judgments as authority for what they explicitly decide, emphasizing the importance of the ratio decidendi and applying it contextually to facts, as seen in cases involving procedural issues and statutory interpretation Philip J. VS Ashapura Minechem Ltd. - Dishonour Of Cheque, Philip J. VS Ashapura Minechem Ltd. - Bombay, Philip J. VS Ashapura Minechem Ltd. - Dishonour Of Cheque.
Specific Case Reliance on Landmark Rulings - In criminal law, decisions such as Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka highlight the importance of circumstantial evidence, while in civil matters, judgments like Jolly George Varghese v. State of Kerala clarify the principles of arrest and execution of decrees Bhura alias Balram Gurjar VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh.
Quashing Cases Based on Landmark Judgments - The Supreme Court has quashed proceedings where procedural irregularities are evident, citing the Bajanlal case as authoritative in such matters, including cases involving illegal seizure and registration issues G. Madhusudhan Reddy VS State Of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh.
Interpretation of Legal Terms - The Supreme Court's judgment in Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta clarifies that the term ‘service’ has multiple meanings, impacting legal interpretations and administrative decisions A. IGNATIOUS JULIAN VS PASSPORT OFFICER - Consumer.
Analysis and Conclusion
The collective references underscore the Supreme Court's role in establishing and reaffirming fundamental legal principles through landmark judgments. These decisions serve as guiding precedents across various branches of law—criminal, civil, constitutional—and emphasize the importance of procedural correctness, statutory interpretation, and substantive rights. The judgments cited are pivotal in shaping legal doctrine, ensuring justice, and maintaining consistency in judicial reasoning.
It is submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has considered all the cases of equal pay for equal work and delivered the landmark judgment. Mr. ... JUDGMENT : ... P.P. Bhatt, J. ... 1. ... Yatin Oza, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners further submits that so far as the cases of the petitioners are concerned, the petitioners are eligible and entitled to get the benefits of equal pay for equal work in light of the judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Apex Court recently in the case ... Yatin Oza, #....
In support of his contentions, the learned counsel has relied upon a landmark judgment of Constitutional Bench of the Apex Court rendered in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia etc. v. The State of Punjab, AIR 1980 Supreme Court 1632 and has drawn my attention to para No. 26 of the said judgment. ... The judgment rendered in M.R. Narayanans case (supra) was in regard to certain harsh conditions imposed by the Learned Sessions Court while deciding the application. ... Hundal, learned#HL_END....
Learned counsel has also placed reliance upon the landmark judgment of Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, (2018) 3 SCC 22. However, the said case was primarily of cheating for stopping the payment of cheque. ... This judgment does not deal with Section 37 of the NDPS Act and it deals with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. (ii) The next judgment relied upon by the learned counsel is Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma vs. ... (iii) The third judgmen....
, person having no means to satisfy the decree cannot be arrested-Order of arrest of judgment debtor set aside. ... Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Order 21, Rules 37 and 38-Arrest of judgment-debtor, a Collie on his failure to satisfy the decree-Held ... The learned counsel would also press into service the landmark judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Jolly George Varghese v. ... Today, when the above Civil Revision Petition was taken up for consideration in the presence of the #HL_S....
To substantiate his contention, learned counsel for respondent no.1 has relied upon a landmark judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Dulichand Laxminarayan vs. ... JUDGMENT : ... Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J. ... Further, according to learned counsel for respondent no.1, a decision is only an authority for what it actually decides. What is the essence of the decision is the ratio and every judgment must be read as applicable to the particular facts. ... Hence, they are being dec....
To substantiate his contention, learned counsel for respondent no.1 has relied upon a landmark judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Dulichand Laxminarayan vs. ... Further, according to learned counsel for respondent no.1, a decision is only an authority for what it actually decides. What is the essence of the decision is the ratio and every judgment must be read as applicable to the particular facts. ... Hence, they are being decided by this common judgment. ... 2. ... In this vie....
To substantiate his contention, learned counsel for respondent no.1 has relied upon a landmark judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Dulichand Laxminarayan vs. ... JUDGMENT ... Dr. Shalini Phansalkarjoshi, J. ... Further, according to learned counsel for respondent no.1, a decision is only an authority for what it actually decides. What is the essence of the decision is the ratio and every judgment must be read as applicable to the particular facts. ... Hence, they are being decid....
Criminal Law - Circumstantial Evidence - IPC 302, IPC 201, IPC 377 - The judgment discusses the circumstantial evidence and the ... Learned counsel for the appellant has placed his reliance upon a landmark judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of 'Earabhadrappa v. ... JUDGMENT ... N. K. Gupta, J. ... ... The appellant has preferred the present appeal being aggrieved with the judgment dated 26.3.2012 passed by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal....
Learned counsel relies upon the landmark judgment of State of Haryana and others v Ch. Bajanlal and Ors. , to argue that as the seizure of the alcohol and the registration of the case are not correct, this Court should interfere and pass orders quashing the case. ... All further proceedings under Crime No.95 of 2020 of Rampachodavaram Police Station, are quashed, in line with the landmark judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Bajanlal case (3 supra), since the uncontroverted allegations in t....
The argument is no longer available in view of the latest landmark judgment of the Supreme Court in Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta, III (1993) CPJ 7 (SC) where the learned Judges have held that the word ‘service’ has variety of meanings. ... A copy of this judgment will be forwarded to the Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi for information and necessary action. ... Complaint dismissed. ... ____
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.