Gaon Burah as a Party - Under the Assam Frontier Regulation, Gaon Burahs are recognized as local traditional authorities who can be parties in legal proceedings, especially concerning land and customary matters Kaliram Regon VS Anima Taying W/o Late Talom Tayeying - Gauhati.

Legal Provisions for Validity of Orders - If an order or proceeding involving Gaon Burah is found to be invalid, courts have the authority to strike out issues or dismiss cases based on procedural irregularities or jurisdictional errors, as per Order XIV, Rule 5(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, which allows courts to strike out issues that are wrongly framed or without proper jurisdiction Kaliram Regon VS Anima Taying W/o Late Talom Tayeying - Gauhati.

Main Point - The Assam Frontier Regulation confers civil jurisdiction on Deputy Commissioners, enabling them to hear cases involving Gaon Burahs as local authorities. However, if an order is invalid, courts can dismiss or strike out issues related to Gaon Burahs, maintaining procedural integrity Kaliram Regon VS Anima Taying W/o Late Talom Tayeying - Gauhati.

Insight - The legal framework recognizes Gaon Burahs as legitimate parties within the jurisdiction of the Assam Frontier Regulation, but their involvement and the validity of orders concerning them depend on adherence to procedural rules and jurisdictional correctness.

Conclusion - When an order involving a Gaon Burah under the Assam Frontier Regulation is invalid, courts have the authority to set aside or dismiss such orders, ensuring that proceedings are conducted within the scope of proper jurisdiction and procedural fairness.