AI Overview...
-
Liability for Underpayment of Minimum Wages - Employers or contractors can be held liable for underpayment of wages, as established under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. For instance, in GOCL Corporation Limited vs Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Dhanbad - Jharkhand, the court confirmed the Labour Commissioner's order directing a company to deposit Rs. 86,70,688/- for wage underpayment, emphasizing the obligation to pay minimum wages. Similarly, BABURAJ P B vs KERALA VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY - Kerala highlights that tender notices lacking clear wage rate clauses can lead to disputes over minimum wage compliance, potentially exposing contractors to liability.
-
Jurisdiction and Enforcement - Labour authorities, such as Labour Commissioners, have limited jurisdiction primarily to determine minimum wages and related remedies. Claims beyond this scope, like contractual disputes, must be pursued in appropriate forums (Guru Ghasidas University Through Registrar Koni, Bilaspur vs Shri Bheemrao Bagde (National Vice President) All India Central Council Of Trade Unions (Aicctu) - Chhattisgarh). Liability often falls on contractors or employers, with courts affirming that they are responsible for ensuring minimum wage payments (GOCL Corporation Limited vs Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Dhanbad - Jharkhand, BABURAJ P B vs KERALA VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY - Kerala).
-
Guarantees and Surplus Funds - Certain statutory provisions, such as the 20% surplus guarantee, serve as a financial safeguard for minimum wage payments, ensuring funds are available if wages are unpaid (EXPRESS CABLES PRIVATE LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - Calcutta).
-
Additional Employee Benefits and Liabilities - Employers may also be liable for other statutory obligations, such as bonus payments under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1955, where disputes about liability can escalate to industrial disputes if contested (JUNIOR LABOUR INSPECTOR CENTRAL VS AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT - Madhya Pradesh). Similarly, liabilities related to gratuity and pension are enforceable, with courts affirming employer responsibilities in grant-in-aid institutions and government employees (AMBIKA MISSION BOYS MIDDLE SCHOOL, AMBIKAPUR VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh, Raijibhai Melabhai Chauhan VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat).
-
Implications of Non-compliance - Failure to pay minimum wages or statutory benefits can lead to legal penalties, including deposits, compensation, or other remedies. Courts consistently uphold these liabilities, emphasizing the importance of compliance with minimum wage laws and related statutes.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Liability for underpayment of minimum wages is well-established under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, and related statutes. Employers and contractors are primarily responsible for ensuring timely and full payment, with authorities empowered to enforce compliance. Non-compliance can result in significant legal and financial consequences, including deposits, penalties, and liability for additional benefits such as bonuses and gratuity. Courts reinforce that statutory obligations are mandatory, and liability extends to entities controlling or responsible for wage payments, emphasizing the importance of adherence to minimum wage laws to prevent disputes and penalties.
Search Results for "Liability for Underpayment of Minimum Wages"
2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 41457 • India - High Court of Kerala
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
wages, potentially allowing underpayment and legal disputes. ... Tender - Grievance against tender notice - Minimum Wages Act - No specific clause for quoting wage rate. ... challenged a tender notice issued by the respondents for manual workers, arguing it lacked a clause for quoting rates including minimum ... P1 tender, as to the requirement to quote the rate by the concerned contractor/participants in the bid reckoning the liability to satisfy the minimum #HL_STAR....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 3604 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
(A) Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Section 20(2) - Labour dispute regarding payment of minimum wages - The appellant-company was directed ... to deposit Rs. 86,70,688/- for underpayment of wages and compensation for contractual workers - Labour Enforcement Officer's inspection ... : ... The court confirmed the findings of the Labour Commissioner, stating that there was no basis to disturb the order, as the underpayment ... spirit of the MINIMUM #HL_STAR....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9183 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J
8) ... ... (B) Labour Commissioner's Jurisdiction - Authority cannot adjudicate on claims beyond mere determination of minimum ... wages and appropriate remedies for other claims must be pursued in relevant forums. ... He argues that the liability is on the contractor to pay wages to workmen whereas the learned Regional Labour Commissioner (C), Bilaspur fastened the liability upon the petitioner if the contractor fails to make payment. He prays to quash the order impugned. ... Versus Authority under #....
1989 0 Supreme(Cal) 254 • India - Calcutta
A.K.SENGUPTA, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
forward the excess to the extent of another 20% of the allocable surplus is only in the nature of a guarantee for the payment of minimum ... forward the excess to the extent of another 20% of the allocable surplus was only in the nature of a guarantee for the payment of minimum ... forward the excess to the extent of another 20% of the allocable surplus is only in the nature of a guarantee for the payment of minimum ... The said Act applies to all factories and it provides by Section 10 that every employer shall be bound to pay to every e....
1975 0 Supreme(MP) 129 • India - Madhya Pradesh
P.K.TARE, R.J.BHAVE, S.S.SHARMA
(3) Payment of Bonus Act, 1955 - S. 22 - scope of - employer not disputing the liability ... (1) Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - S. 2 (vi) – Wages - bonus payable under the Payment of Bonus Act - is within the scope of wages. ... It was further observed that " if the employer disputes his liability to pay, it becomes an Industrial Dispute. " The present case in fact is not covered by these observations. ... Learned Judges in Junior Labour Inspectors case (supra) observed that " if an employer does not disp....
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1849 • India - Bombay
R.M.SAVANT, M.S.KARNIK
wages payable under Notification dated 24-2-2015 and wages being now paid to its workmen - For period for which increased minimum ... Service - Workmen - Contract of collection - Strike by making payment - Contract workers - Increased minimum ... by making payment to contract workers / labourers working with Petitioner which is additional costs incurred towards increased minimum ... It is stated that the said Committee made the enhancement and reported that the Petitioner can easily absorb the #HL_START....
2022 0 Supreme(AP) 767 • India - Andhra Pradesh
RAVI NATH TILHARI
The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the 2nd respondent is not the employee within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Act 1972 based on Rule 72(3) of the Rules with respect to liability for payment of salary/wages to the 2nd respondent, is also unsustainable and is rejected for ... (b) Candidates with greater experience and possessing higher qualifications (being more than the minimum prescribed, for the posts of Cadre Secretaries) shall, as far as possible, be considered for allotment to any society under catego....
2001 0 Supreme(Bom) 1204 • India - Bombay
A.P.DESHPANDE
It provides that such of the employees who have put in more than 3 years of service and have put in a minimum of 240 days of actual work in each year are entitled to receive bonus. ... The right of a person to receive bonus so also the corresponding liability of the State to pay the bonus is an adjudged right in favour of the employees, contained in the Scheme provided by the Government Resolution. 6. ... In these petitions, there was a crystalised right in favour of the employees to receive bonus as they satisfied the condition No. 5 contained in Clause 3....
2020 0 Supreme(Chh) 236 • India - Chhattisgarh
GOUTAM BHADURI
the grant-in-aided schools - Ordered for payment of gratuity to Institution - Petitioners, therefore, primarily challenged their liability ... Institution which having been challenged in appeal u/s 7 of Act, same was affirmed - Petitioners, therefore, primarily challenged their liability ... The State urged that since the financial liability is to be incurred, it has right to lay down a cut-off date to own or disown the liability under the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972, by letter dated 07.06.2013. ... It is further submit....
2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 1998 • India - Gujarat
PARESH UPADHYAY
... (x) Pensionable service rendered by an employee in a grant-in-aid institution the pension liability in respect of which is borne by the Government to the extent as may be ordered by the Government from time to time." ... "Rule-80. ... case of a Government employee retiring on Superannuation, Retiring, Invalid or Compensation Pension in accordance with the provisions of these rules after completing qualifying service of not less than thirty-three years, the amount of pension shall be fifty per cent of the pensionable pay subject to minimum ... Pension i....
Filter by Legal Phrase
