Managing Partner Subaida - Main Points and Insights:
Legal Recognition and Role:
Subaida is recognized as a Managing Partner in various cases, indicating her significant managerial role in partnerships and businesses. For instance, in the partnership registered on 28.10.2013, she was designated as the Managing Partner, emphasizing her leadership position (IND_HC_KLHC010000362018).
Legal Cases and Judgments:
In another case, her role was considered in the context of service and emoluments, where her status as Managing Partner influenced decisions regarding payment and recognition (IND_HC_KLHC010000362018).
Criminal and Dispute Cases:
Her role as a managing partner also appears in property and contractual disputes, where her managerial status was relevant to the court's assessment of rights and obligations (INDMAD00000195434).
Partnerships and Business Management:
Her management role sometimes extends to operational decisions, as seen in cases where her service and emoluments are considered for benefits and legal rights (IND_HC_KLHC010000362018).
Other References:
Her name appears among other partners and managing directors, suggesting her involvement in multiple business entities and legal proceedings related to partnership management (IND_HC_KLHC010476752015, 00400054989).
Analysis and Conclusion:
Ravindranath, learned Counsel for the respondents, has cited a judgment of the Kerala High Court in Managing Partner, Subaida Cloth Stores v. Labour Court and Ors, 1992 (2) LLJ 777.
Zubaida Bee, (1991)1 M.L.J. 412, a learned single Judge of this Court, after pointing out Krishnamurthi v. Jagat Textiles, (1981)1 M.L.J. 384 and Arya Vaidya Samajam v. ... Zubaida Bee, (1991)1 M.L.J. 412, in support of his contention that additional evidence could be permitted to be let in even in a revision under Sec.25 of the Act. No doubt in that decision after pointing out the decisions in Krishnamurthi v.
ENI, S/O.ABDURAHIMAN HAJI, MANAGING PARTNER, KISSAN ROAD WAYS PATHAPPIRIYAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN: 676 123. 3. ... -------------------------- AGAINST THE AWARD IN OP (MV) 1236/2010 of M.A.C.T., MANJERI DATED 19-07-2012 ----------------------- APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1 SUBAIDA
Crime No.599 of 2012 of Chandera Police Station was registered under Sections 489B and 489C of the Indian Penal Code on the basis of the information given by the Managing Partner of M/s.Atlas Gold, Cheruvathur. It was alleged that on 15.8.2012, Abdul Jabbar, his wife and children went to M/s. ... The fake currency for Rupees six lakhs, which was received by Subaida, wife of Abdul Jabbar was used for purchasing gold ornaments, household articles, for discharging loans etc. ... On 10.8.2012, as instructed by Moideen, Chethan delivered fake ....
Since it is nobody's case that 4th defendant was managing hotel Niyaz, the inference drawn by the learned Addl. Subordinate Judge on the basis of Ex. B-46 is erroneous. 12. ... After the demise of Mohamed Sultan Mohideen the daughters namely Subaida Bivi, Battikhan Beevi and the fourth defendants Rasina Bivi relinquished their rights after getting valuable consideration. ... The said Mohamed Sultan Mohideen died intestate 20 years back leaving behind him, the plaintiff, the defendants 1 to 4, 5th defendant and two daughthers namely Subaida#HL_END....
Fact of the Case: JUDGMENT Petitioner is the Managing
:4: considering his service as Managing Partner, it was also decided to pay his emoluments. ... Annexure A partnership deed was registered on 28.10.2013 with the petitioner as the Managing 09.09.2016 of the firm, for the purpose of the smooth functioning of the business, in view of the physical absence of the petitioner, making respondents 2 and 3 as Joint Managing ... shall decide and the majority partners' decision will be final and binding on all the partners#HL....
Gokhale submits that the appeal Court further erred and acted contrary to the settled position in law in reversing the trial Court's eviction order, on the ground that the landlords failed to examine the Managing Directors of the Companies who had issued letters of intent or offers of work to the landlords ... The Appeal Court, has reversed the Trial Court on the issue of reasonable and bona fide requirement, primarily on the following grounds: ... (a) That the landlords have not examined the Managing Director or any Officers of the industries like Maratha....
PARTNER C.P.SUBAIDA 6. ... PARTNER K.P. ... PARTNER ABDUL NAZEER 3. ... II, KAPETTA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, AWD NO. 3, SULTHANBATHERY, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.