AI Overview...
-
Manoj Kumar (also referred to as Manoj Ram or Manoj Rungta) - Multiple legal proceedings involve him, including criminal cases, modifications of orders, and land disputes. Notably, in MANOJ RAM Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR - Patna, his parentage was clarified as son of Rudal Ram, and there was a modification of an order related to his case. He is also involved in land manipulation allegations, with claims of record forgery and attempts to illegally acquire land (Mahanth Kalyan Das VS State of U. P. - Allahabad).
-
Legal Proceedings & Court Orders - Several cases involve Manoj Kumar in criminal miscellaneous petitions (e.g., CRL.M.C. 1403/2018, 1406/2018, 1407/2018), with courts allowing modifications and considering evidence related to his identity and claims (MANOJ RUNGTA Vs. STATE & ANR - Delhi, MANOJ RAM Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR - Patna, Manoj Ram and Anr Vs The State - Patna).
-
Land Disputes & Forgery - Allegations of land grabbing through record manipulation and forgery are prominent. Courts have observed attempts to manipulate land records, including Khatauni forgery for fasli years (Mahanth Kalyan Das VS State of U. P. - Allahabad).
-
Criminal Incidents - Manoj Kumar has been involved in accidents and violence cases. For example, in National Insurance Company VS Savina - Himachal Pradesh, he was driving a vehicle rashly, leading to a fatal accident. The owner of the vehicle had engaged him after verifying his driving license, but the incident resulted in fatalities (National Insurance Company VS Savina - Himachal Pradesh).
-
Other Cases & References - The sources also mention cases where Manoj Kumar is involved as a complainant or accused, and legal references to judgments in similar matters, such as fertilizer quality and vehicle accidents (Lodhiwala Cass Ltd VS State Of Punjab And Others - Punjab and Haryana, MANOJ RUNGTA Vs STATE & ANR - Delhi, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. VS Mathu Ram - Himachal Pradesh).
Analysis & Conclusion: Manoj Kumar, also known as Manoj Ram or Manoj Rungta, appears prominently in multiple legal contexts, including criminal cases, land disputes involving forgery, and traffic incidents. Courts have addressed issues of identity modification, land record manipulation, and criminal liability. The recurring theme is legal scrutiny over land record falsification and criminal conduct, with court orders reflecting attempts to rectify or modify previous judgments. His involvement spans criminal, civil, and land dispute domains, indicating a complex legal profile.
References: - MANOJ RUNGTA Vs. STATE & ANR - Delhi - MANOJ RAM Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR - Patna - Manoj Ram and Anr Vs The State - Patna - RAMESH KUMAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND And ANR - Jharkhand - Mahanth Kalyan Das VS State of U. P. - Allahabad - National Insurance Company VS Savina - Himachal Pradesh - Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. VS Mathu Ram - Himachal Pradesh - Lodhiwala Cass Ltd VS State Of Punjab And Others - Punjab and Haryana - MANOJ RUNGTA Vs STATE & ANR - Delhi
Search Results for "Manoj Kumar 1403"
2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 13325 • India - High Court of Delhi
JYOTI SINGH, J FEBRUARY 20, 2024/shivam CRL.M.C. 1403/2018 & connected matters
2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 14747 • India - High Court of Delhi
JYOTI SINGH, J FEBRUARY 20, 2024/shivam CRL.M.C. 1403/2018 & connected matters
• India - Patna High Court
Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha
1403 of 2019 is modified to the extent that parentage name of petitioner no. 1, Manoj Ram, be read as son of Rudal Ram. ... JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 06-03-2019 This application for modification has been filed to modify the order dated 22.01.2019 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 1403 of 2019. ... sujit/- (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) U T ... Case No.-317 Year-2018 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Manoj Ram, So....
• India - Jharkhand
Consequent thereto on 01.05.2007 Govind Kumar Singh and on 02.05.2007 Manoj Kumar Manoj Kumar and Ranjeet Vishwarkarma. ... 2 the complainant; Manoj Kumar and Ranjeet Vishwarkarma aggrieved with the his friends, namely, Manoj Kumar, JE-I (P.Way) Safety Counselor/ Ranchi and M.1403/2007 before SDM/Ranchi against the three culprits.
2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3611 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 1406/2018 MANOJ RUNGTA S/o. Sh. Gauri Shankar Rungata, R/o-Diamond City North, Block-16, IInd Floor, 68 Jessore Road, Kolkatta-700055 .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ranjan Kumar and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates. ... + CRL.M.C. 1407/2018 MANOJ RUNGTA S/o. Sh. Gauri Shankar Rungata, R/o-Diamond City North, Block-16, IInd Floor, 68 Jessore Road, Kolkatta-700055 .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ranjan Kumar and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates. ... Ankit Signature Not Verified Digitally Sig....
2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 3511 • India - Punjab and Haryana
H.S.MADAAN
Further, in the case of Arun Kumar and Others Vs. State of Punjab , (1995) 3 RCR(Criminal) 231, the accused purchased bags fertilizer from National Fertilizer Limited and kept the same in original form without any tampering. Sample from bags found to be sub-standard. ... Learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M-4582 of 2008 titled Manoj Grover Versus State of Punjab, wherein referring to authority State of Punjab Versus Jagdish Chand and another , (2004) 2 RCR(Criminal) 478, in which it ....
2020 0 Supreme(All) 2 • India - Allahabad
DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Manoj Kumar in his statement recorded under Section 202 Cr.P.C. also stated that he had been seeing the possession of respondent no.2 and his brothers on the land in question. The petitioners have no concern about the said land. The petitioners want to grab the land by manipulating the record. ... The Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.1395 of 2018, Anand Kumar Mohatta and another Vs. ... Khatauni for the fasli years 1392-1397 and 1398-1403 were also prepared committing forgery and manipulation. ... Office is directed ....
• India - Patna High Court
Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha
Praveen Kumar Agrawal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1403 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. ... No.1403 of 2019(2) dt.22-01-2019 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the above submission, this application is allowed. ... Manoj Ram aged about 37 years (Male) son of Late Gyanchan Ram. 2. Rudal Ram aged about 40 years (Male) son ....
2019 0 Supreme(HP) 2031 • India - Himachal Pradesh
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
HP-31-B-0234 being driven by respondent No.6, Manoj Kumar, in a rash and negligent manner, came from the opposite side and hit the motorcycle of deceased, resulting in multiple injuries to the deceased, who later on succumbed to the same. ... 17 This question assumes importance as it is the specific case of the owner of the vehicle in this case that he had engaged the services of Manoj Kumar as driver only after seeing his driving licence and testing driving his skills. ... 18 In addition thereto, the owner of the vehi....
2018 0 Supreme(HP) 942 • India - Himachal Pradesh
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Sharma, Senior Advocate, assisted by Shri Jeevan Kumar, Advocate, for the Insurance Company and Shri Manoj Chauhan, Advocate, for the claimants and Shri B. R. Sharma, Advocate, for the owner of the vehicle. 11. ... versus Rajbir Singh , 2013 ACJ 1403. ... No doubt, on the basis of statement of respondent No. 2 (RW-1) and Vinod Kumar (RW-2 as well as on perusal of Ext. ... The Tribunal has recorded in paragraph 28 that RW-2 Vinod Kumar had stated that on receiving the application of the driver Sanjiv #H....
Filter by Legal Phrase
